Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Eliphas Levi · 05-10-2007, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nazaroo

Its always been we. Nazaroo and mr.scrivener.
We have always worked as a team on this project,
and he posts where he likes to post his announcements,
and I post where I like to post.

I have just spent a week gathering rare photographs of ancient manuscripts and writing a discussion of the value of the textual evidence in each case, and made it available to everyone free on the web.

What have YOU done to contribute positively to this thread, in the dozens of critical and sour-grapes whining posts you have placed here? You sound like someone's ex-wife, or a broken record.

Get a life.

Bye now.

It is a amazing that a person completely obsessed with a story in which the main point is "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone" indulges in name calling on a message board thread he devoted to the same story.

Nazaroo · 05-10-2007, 06:55 AM

..amazing, and also completely off-topic. Can you contribute to the discussion of the authenticity of John 8:1-11?

If so, please do.

RED DAVE · 05-10-2007, 07:32 AM

From Nazaroo:

Quote:

"BluePeter" is of course an infamous euphemism for 'gay man'.

You seem to have some kind of an obsession with convential masculinity: martial arts, guns, university students as wimps and worse. What's with that?

RED DAVE

Eliphas Levi · 05-10-2007, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nazaroo

..amazing, and also completely off-topic. Can you contribute to the discussion of the authenticity of John 8:1-11?

If so, please do.

At least you avoided name calling in this post. Did you run out of stones already?

Does starting the thread automatically give you the right to have complete control over the discussion within the thread? I didn't realize that was a rule here at IIDB.

In any case, it does not appear that you are actually interested in any opposing views. Can you cite any evidence where anyone has actually changed your mind on this topic with an opposing view? If so, it might actually be worthy of debate.

Toto · 05-10-2007, 12:03 PM

Blue Peter has another meaning to the author of the site:

Quote:

A "Blue Peter" is a blue flag with a white square at the center of it. It is one of a number of those little maritime flags that one might see fluttering in the breeze, high in the masts of a sea going vessel. If worked in with other alphabetical flags, it stands for the letter 'P'. If, however, the "Blue Peter" is hoisted alone, it stands for something else. Under the International Code of Signals, in harbour, hoisted at the foremast head, the Blue Peter flag flying alone would mean that "All persons should report on board as the vessel is about to proceed to sea." At sea, it may be used by fishing vessels to mean, "My nets have come fast upon an obstruction."

My banner is the Blue Peter; you will spot it on a number of my pages; it is clickable and will bring you back to my home page. I felt I needed a logo and thought that the Blue Peter will do just fine. My name is Peter. If you care to follow me through my pages, you will proceed into a sea of law and history; and, more generally, literature, an avocation of mine for many years. Also, as you will soon detect as you read through certain of my writings, I am of the view that the state of society has come fast upon an obstruction, a collectivist obstruction, which the political dreamers amongst us have created.

. . .

RED DAVE · 05-10-2007, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toto

Blue Peter has another meaning to the author of the site:

As I said above, Nazaroo seems to have some peculiar opinions with regard to traditional masculinity.

RED DAVE

Toto · 05-10-2007, 12:49 PM

Nazaroo does not control the thread, but in general we ask you to keep comments on topic. Nazaroo's issues on masculinity are not really on topic, even where he opened the door to the issue.

Thanks for your consideration.

Nazaroo · 05-11-2007, 04:48 AM

I'd like to express my appreciation to the moderator for taking some action on this.

Thank you Toto.

Nazaroo · 05-12-2007, 06:15 AM

The extra discussion thread that examined P66 and Codex Sinaiticus in more detail is now pretty much covered.

I am including a link to it here so that those following this thread can find it in case they might miss it.

P66 and Codex Aleph Examined in more Detail <-- Click Here.

Nazaroo · 05-13-2007, 11:34 AM

I'd like to thank all those who participated in both threads, for helping me to write yet another great article favouring the authenticity of the PA. Some of you have now been immortalized for your contributions. The best questions and answers have been chosen for inclusion:

Codex Sinaiticus ReExamined <-- Click here and enjoy!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

05-10-2007, 06:55 AM	#392
Nazaroo Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 528	..amazing, and also completely off-topic. Can you contribute to the discussion of the authenticity of John 8:1-11? If so, please do.

05-10-2007, 12:49 PM	#397
Toto Contributor Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Los Angeles area Posts: 40,549	Nazaroo does not control the thread, but in general we ask you to keep comments on topic. Nazaroo's issues on masculinity are not really on topic, even where he opened the door to the issue. Thanks for your consideration.

05-11-2007, 04:48 AM	#398
Nazaroo Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 528	I'd like to express my appreciation to the moderator for taking some action on this. Thank you Toto.

05-12-2007, 06:15 AM	#399
Nazaroo Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 528	The extra discussion thread that examined P66 and Codex Sinaiticus in more detail is now pretty much covered. I am including a link to it here so that those following this thread can find it in case they might miss it. P66 and Codex Aleph Examined in more Detail <-- Click Here.

05-13-2007, 11:34 AM	#400
Nazaroo Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 528	I'd like to thank all those who participated in both threads, for helping me to write yet another great article favouring the authenticity of the PA. Some of you have now been immortalized for your contributions. The best questions and answers have been chosen for inclusion: Codex Sinaiticus ReExamined <-- Click here and enjoy!

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.