FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-15-2005, 06:22 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
About discrepancies - this isn't a matter of whether the car was navy blue or dark green depending on the light, it was who was where and when.

And I don't know about you, but I'm still living, so the world hasn't ended yet.
Well I suppose that depends on what one means by world.

In a previous discussion Amlodhi looked at the idea that world to the anciemts meant not merely space but time and space.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amlodhi
Thus, each successive "new world age" brings with it not only a new "world ruler", but also a "heavens new".

Big "however" though; this is not to say that "Isaiah" understood all this. Isaiah was firmly enmeshed in the colloquial YHWH culture of Judah, and yet, I think it worth considering that a syncretic accumulation of concepts, imagery and vernacular (especially during the Babylonian captivity) may have tempered his visualization (and thus, descriptions) of Yahwism . . . as it always has done and as it always will do.

"For from today new feasts and customs date,
Because tonight is born Shah Kai Khusrau!
...'Sleep no more, but join the feast
Of Kai Khusrau, the monarch of the world. . .

The whole world is my kingdom, all is mine
From Pisces downward to the Bull's head."

(Note that Kai Khusrau is monarch of the whole world; whereas, "From Pisces downward to the Bull's head" is a measure of time, not geography.)

{Firdausi, Warner trans., vol. 2, pg. 342 & pg. 407, (parenthetical comment mine)}
Last post in this thread
judge is offline  
Old 06-15-2005, 06:27 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Judge:
Yes you are right. Unless there is something about this I don't understand or some information left out (I can't imagine what it might be though) then these two accounts are not the same.

That is not a problem for me. I don't believe that this is the "word of God" or anything
You'll have to enlighten me. At the TWeb thread you referenced you say this:

Quote:
I am full preterist (at least I think I am), in other words I believe that Jesus has already returned or come in glory, and that the resurrection of the dead has happened as well.
Yet you say that "this" isn't the "word of God." By "this," I assume you mean the Bible, but perhaps you just mean specific sections. Please tell me how you can be a preterist yet not believe that the Bible (or parts thereof) is the word of God. How do you determine that the sections which teach preterism (per your interpretation) are the "word of God" parts?
John Kesler is offline  
Old 06-15-2005, 06:34 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 5,470
Default

More than once I've heard radio preachers bring up the example of Jonnie Erickson Todda. She was somewhere around 20, I think, when she became a quadriplegic. I believe the view that is attributed to her is that God caused (or at least allowed) her limbs to become useless so that she would have a memorable testimony. God wants to keep her that way, because she is useful to Him in that condition is how the thinking goes.

Psychologists would probably call that a case of using a religious belief as a coping mechanism.
Tubby Lardmore is offline  
Old 06-15-2005, 06:39 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kesler


Yet you say that "this" isn't the "word of God." By "this," I assume you mean the Bible, but perhaps you just mean specific sections. Please tell me how you can be a preterist yet not believe that the Bible (or parts thereof) is the word of God. How do you determine that the sections which teach preterism (per your interpretation) are the "word of God" parts?
None of the bible is the word of God in the sense that god dictated none of it.

Men may have been inspired to greater or lesser degrees when wrting some parts, but this might happen a lot, not just in the bible.

The bible does not have to be the "word of god" for preterism to be true. The message in the bible can still be reliable.

But ultimately in "spiritual" matters one grows in confidence (or scepticism perhaps) as one goes along. We need to test what we think must or might be true about God and work from there.
judge is offline  
Old 06-15-2005, 08:31 PM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
I fixed the link - it had an extra space in the title.
Thanks a lot for that information. It included a real gem:

Quote:
Why then is the medicalisation of disability inappropriate? The simple
answer to this is that disability is a social state and not a medical
condition.
Never were truer words ever spoken! If a person is crippled by anything, it is society’s stupid and cruel attitudes toward those who are deemed to be “inferior� or “unfit.� My troubles with my needing to use a wheelchair originate in these Neanderthal attitudes, and there’s no reason that I or anybody else who uses a wheelchair could not live a happy, full life. That is, there’s no reason except people’s behavior.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
Jagella - could I be so intrusive to ask if you have a medical diagnosis saying you would never be able to walk?
Yes—I hear the gasps of horror already.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
Did the Christians (or others) think that your back problem had a psychosomatic aspect to it?
I imagine that they thought it may have had a “faithosomatic� aspect. That is, I was only crippled by my own lack of faith. A faith healer one day asked me if I believed a Bible passage that spoke of miraculous healing. I replied that I believed it. He then retorted: “If you believe it, then get up out of that wheelchair!...You’re already healed…If you don’t start to believe it, then you’ll be in that wheelchair until the day you die!�

Jagella
Jagella is offline  
Old 06-15-2005, 08:44 PM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tubby Lardmore
More than once I've heard radio preachers bring up the example of Jonnie Erickson Tadda.
Although I often find Tadda to be rather embarrassing, it appears that I may be turning into a “Jonnie Erickson Tadda of atheism.� That is, I’m using my experiences as a wheelchair user to testify for people forsaking the Christian religion rather than converting to it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tubby Lardmore
I believe the view that is attributed to her is that God caused (or at least allowed) her limbs to become useless so that she would have a memorable testimony. God wants to keep her that way, because she is useful to Him in that condition is how the thinking goes.
See what I mean by embarrassing? Can you think of anything more stupid than to believe that some loving God that created Tadda took away the use of her lower extremities as some kind of a way to get people to convert to Christianity?

One more thing about Ms. Tadda before I go. Referring to the Shaivo execution, I recently saw Tadda quoted as saying that “disabled� people should not be killed because they can be converted to Christianity! I’ll sleep much sounder tonight knowing that these loving Christians don’t want me dead.

Jagella
Jagella is offline  
Old 06-16-2005, 02:32 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hayward, CA, USA
Posts: 1,675
Default

I'll once again note that most of the people who claim that suffering serves a greater purpose are not those who are doing the suffering. The correct response to the next person who tells you that if you had faith, you'd get up out of your wheelchair is: Okay, I'll hit you over the head with my cane. If you have faith, it won't hurt. I use a similar argument with doctors who think that pain control should consist of "grit your teeth and bear it."

And yes, some people use religion as a way of coping with their disability. Because otherwise, they'd have to accept that sometimes bad things just happen for no reason at all. New Mobility had a survey up on their website last year that asked

Has your disability affected your religious beliefs?
  • more religious
  • has not affected my religious beliefs
  • less religious
  • made me an atheist

I unfortunately didn't go back and see what the final results were.

I can still walk some, so I've been tempted to get out of my wheelchair when some nutcase decides to try and "heal" me, just to mess with them. But on the whole, I'd rather they just not lay hands on me at all. They don't quite understand how offensive it is when they imply that if I just "got right with God" I'd get better.

Jagella, if you haven't found it yet, Wheelchairjunkie Forum is a useful place for folks like us.
Jackalope is offline  
Old 06-16-2005, 06:11 AM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: WA
Posts: 148
Default

Quote:
“If you believe it, then get up out of that wheelchair!...You’re already healed…If you don’t start to believe it, then you’ll be in that wheelchair until the day you die!�
Well. That's your cue to lean forward in your chair and do a little 'laying on of hands' yourself. Preferably around the &*#^'s neck.
nowiser is offline  
Old 06-16-2005, 07:20 AM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 484
Default

Hi Jack:

It’s a real pleasure to meet one of my “own kind� here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackalope
I'll once again note that most of the people who claim that suffering serves a greater purpose are not those who are doing the suffering.
True. Whenever I hear some apologist sitting back in his plush armchair trying to reconcile a world full of tragedies with his “loving God,� and he uses the “free will defense�—my eyeballs shoot straight up into my head. If said apologist was being chased by some nut bent on taking his life, would the apologist shrug his shoulders and say: “He might kill me, but thank God he has the free will to do so!�

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackalope
The correct response to the next person who tells you that if you had faith, you'd get up out of your wheelchair is: Okay, I'll hit you over the head with my cane. If you have faith, it won't hurt.
Let’s take it a step further: Why not I break that person’s arm or leg with the cane? I can then watch that Christian’s awesome faith heal that bone before our very eyes! It would shore up my faith, that’s for sure!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackalope
New Mobility had a survey up on their website last year that asked

Has your disability affected your religious beliefs?
I’ve found that most mislabeled persons tend to be irreligious. My guess is that faith can be maintained if you’re not asking for much. If you pray asking for good weather for a church picnic, chances are that the weather will be good, and you can then praise God for a miraculous “answer� to your prayer. If you might be looking for a healing of a bad injury, then prayer is much less likely to “work.� Inevitably, doubt creeps in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackalope
They don't quite understand how offensive it is when they imply that if I just "got right with God" I'd get better.
It makes much more sense to me if a person would “get better� first, and then he or she might “get right with God.� However, Christians need a way to escape the obvious impotence or faith and prayer. As a result, they will blame the person seeking the healing as not having “enough faith.� That way, Christians can go ahead and believe in their God—all evidence to the contrary.

Jagella
Jagella is offline  
Old 06-16-2005, 07:26 AM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nowiser
Well. That's your cue to lean forward in your chair and do a little 'laying on of hands' yourself. Preferably around the &*#^'s neck.
Like I just explained to Jack, I’d break the “healer’s� leg with a cane, and then he could show me how the miracles of healing are done! :rolling:

Jagella
Jagella is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.