FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-12-2010, 12:44 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default Really old written document found in Jerusalem

Oldest written document ever found in J'lem [sic]

Quote:
Hebrew University excavations recently unearthed a clay fragment dating back to the 14th century BCE, said to be the oldest written document ever found in Jerusalem.

The tiny fragment is only 2 cm. by 2.8 cm. in surface area and 1 cm. thick and appears to have once been part of a larger tablet. Researchers say the ancient fragment testifies to Jerusalem’s importance as a major city late in the Bronze Age, long before it was conquered by King David.
Paleojudaica notes:
Quote:
although this fragment is the oldest text discovered in Jerusalem, we have other texts of the same age from Jerusalem which were found in Egypt among the Amarna letters. The six Akkadian letters from Abdi-Heba, the king(let) of Jerusalem, to the Pharaoh of Egypt also date to the fourteenth century BCE. So this find doesn't tell us much that we didn't already know, although it is exciting actually to find a cuneiform table in Jerusalem, even if it is only a small piece whose text doesn't give any connected sense.

...


It's interesting that a letter apparently from Jerusalem ("made of Jerusalem clay") and presumably sent elsewhere was found in Jerusalem. An archive copy?
However small the fragment, the archaeologists involved see the quality of the writing as an indication that Jerusalem was not just some backwater city.
Toto is offline  
Old 07-13-2010, 09:44 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default

Hi Toto,

This seems to be the type of crazy, hyped, jumping to unwarranted conclusions that characterize so much of Biblical archaeology. The finding of a tiny writing fragment in Jerusalem does not prove that it was even written in Jerusalem. It could very well be an odd case of a traveler just dying in Jerualem while carrying some writings. The fact that no other writing has been found from this time period in Jerusalem and the next oldest writing is from 800 C.E., six hundred years later, would suggest exactly the opposite of the hyposthesis put forward. If we consider that there are many towns where thousands of these fragments have been found, it seems finding one fragment in a six hundred year period in this area would not qualify it as a major area. Again, the more logical conclusion is the opposite, that it was a backwater village of little significance.

One might compare this finding of one small fragment to the findings at Ugarit, modern day Ras Shamra in Syria. A palace library and two private libraries of tablets were found in 1928. In 1958, another library was discovered. In 1973, 120 more tablets and in 1994, 300 further tablets., apparently all from the 14th and 13th century B.C.E. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ugarit).

Note: (from http://theophyle.wordpress.com/2009/05/24/ane-ugarit-1/) "The archives of Ras Shamra have yielded several thousand tablets, including 1,400 texts in the Ugaritic language and scripta; while many are fragmentary, others have been preserved in excellent condition. Larger archives have been found, such as the 12,000–15,000 tablets recently discovered at Ebla,

The population of Ugarit has been estimated at around 5-10,000 people (http://www.jstor.org/pss/1356929). If 1,400 tablets were found there, how major could the city of Jerusalem have been where one fragment has so far been found?

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay


Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Oldest written document ever found in J'lem [sic]

Quote:
Hebrew University excavations recently unearthed a clay fragment dating back to the 14th century BCE, said to be the oldest written document ever found in Jerusalem.

The tiny fragment is only 2 cm. by 2.8 cm. in surface area and 1 cm. thick and appears to have once been part of a larger tablet. Researchers say the ancient fragment testifies to Jerusalem’s importance as a major city late in the Bronze Age, long before it was conquered by King David.
Paleojudaica notes:
Quote:
although this fragment is the oldest text discovered in Jerusalem, we have other texts of the same age from Jerusalem which were found in Egypt among the Amarna letters. The six Akkadian letters from Abdi-Heba, the king(let) of Jerusalem, to the Pharaoh of Egypt also date to the fourteenth century BCE. So this find doesn't tell us much that we didn't already know, although it is exciting actually to find a cuneiform table in Jerusalem, even if it is only a small piece whose text doesn't give any connected sense.

...


It's interesting that a letter apparently from Jerusalem ("made of Jerusalem clay") and presumably sent elsewhere was found in Jerusalem. An archive copy?
However small the fragment, the archaeologists involved see the quality of the writing as an indication that Jerusalem was not just some backwater city.
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 07-13-2010, 11:35 AM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: About 120 miles away from aa5874
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post
The population of Ugarit has been estimated at around 5-10,000 people (http://www.jstor.org/pss/1356929). If 1,400 tablets were found there, how major could the city of Jerusalem have been where one fragment has so far been found?
Assuming a population of 5,000, that's a ratio of roughly 3 tablets per person. And considering that one tablet fragment indicates a single tablet once existed...the population of Jerusalem, circa 1400 BC, was one third of one person.
jgreen44 is offline  
Old 07-13-2010, 12:01 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Under a Rainbow
Posts: 48
Default

Eventually this too will pop up in a National Geographic "documentary," with robed actors representing some of the ancient inhabitants of Jerusalem, a hack archaeologist or two oozing charisma and sporting appropriate clothing, and a narrative spoken with mysterious and passionate undertones.
meow is offline  
Old 07-13-2010, 01:50 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. Louis Metro East
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgreen44 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post
The population of Ugarit has been estimated at around 5-10,000 people (http://www.jstor.org/pss/1356929). If 1,400 tablets were found there, how major could the city of Jerusalem have been where one fragment has so far been found?
Assuming a population of 5,000, that's a ratio of roughly 3 tablets per person. And considering that one tablet fragment indicates a single tablet once existed...the population of Jerusalem, circa 1400 BC, was one third of one person.
You should probably recheck your math (hint: your calculation would be correct if 14,000 tablets were found, as opposed to 1,400).

Also, you should take into account that the time period over which the tablets were produced was two centuries. I am thinking you have a population pool quite a bit larger than 5,000 people who produced the tablets.
KeepTalking is offline  
Old 07-13-2010, 05:55 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

There are cuneiform tablets in the Amarna library which were sent to Akhenaten's court which come from Abdi-Heba, the "king" (actually a vassal of Egypt) of "Jerusalem." The assumption of archaeologists is that kings did not write their own letters but employed scribes to handle this mundane task.

The suggestion that "Jerusalem" in the MBA continued to grow and prosper until it became the capitol of David's Empire is simply ludicrous. Archaeology has shown that Jerusalem declined to little more than a miniscule village by the 10th century and did not recover until the late 8th century.

This is little more than an attempt by fundamentalists to prop up their fairy tales. They would have more luck trying to do CPR on a mummy.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 07-14-2010, 03:39 AM   #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 3
Default

Don't the 14th century letters show that Jerusalem was a vassal of Egypt at the time. As this isn't in the Bible I don't see how it helps the Fundamentalists to bring them up.
michaelJ is offline  
Old 07-14-2010, 09:13 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
Default

Maybe it's an old fortune cookie fortune and says "Beware of a guy nmed DVD in 400 years or so"
semiopen is offline  
Old 07-14-2010, 12:38 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default National Geographic Production Advice

Hi meow,

I hope they do not forget the Jewish cantor praying music
To really sell it, I suggest they use Cantor Yossef Gottesman's version of "My Heart Will Go On" from the movie "Titanic"

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay


Quote:
Originally Posted by meow View Post
Eventually this too will pop up in a National Geographic "documentary," with robed actors representing some of the ancient inhabitants of Jerusalem, a hack archaeologist or two oozing charisma and sporting appropriate clothing, and a narrative spoken with mysterious and passionate undertones.
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 11:11 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Rollston’s Reflections on the Fragmentary Cuneiform Tablet from the Ophel: A Critique of the Proposed Historical Context contains some informed criticism of this find.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.