FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2005, 09:52 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: High Point, NC, USA
Posts: 1,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
It means that evolution begins when creation ends while creation itself is what makes evolution possible which therefore is the leading edge of evolution and hence the first cause of life for the living. The living are manifestations of God with a given mandate to be alive.

So yes, if God is first cause he is also exhausted by the first cause and needs us to make life known as second cause.

We are the created essence of God as Lord God here on earth and are co-creator with God as 'like god' to modify and change the essence of God in us. Ie. in our existence of being are we Lord God and in our rational 'like god' mode are we co-creators with God to modify the material existene of Lord God down the road and for generations to come.

So God is the involuntary first cause, Lord God is the sense perceptive second cause and like god is the responsive third cause and therefore co-creator with the first cause.

Not babies per se but creation in general which always is the product of a rout between a pair of opposites that are needed to create and conceive the created.

I think that the aim here is the survial of the fittest. You may have noticed that involuntary creation is not good enough in a compettitive environment where our senses must guide us to change the essence of the created.

We are the manifestation of the 'created' and our creations will be the manifestion of us.
Utter bullshit. Your argument that we are co-creators boils down to the fact that we affect our environment, which can also be said of all other creatures, as well as natural phenomena like volcanoes. It's so vague as to be meaningless. Your definition of "creation" as "a product of a rout between a pair of opposites" is similarly content-free, unsupported, and not anything like the recognized definition. Your entire post is gibberish.
David Vestal is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 10:28 AM   #22
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Vestal
Utter bullshit. Your argument that we are co-creators boils down to the fact that we affect our environment, which can also be said of all other creatures, as well as natural phenomena like volcanoes. It's so vague as to be meaningless. Your definition of "creation" as "a product of a rout between a pair of opposites" is similarly content-free, unsupported, and not anything like the recognized definition. Your entire post is gibberish.
That would be true for those who do not know their ass from a hole in the ground as if it was a volcano with a mind of its own.

We do not affect our environment but respond to it as rational beings with a conscious mind to know the difference between good and evil which is given to us for our good and for the good of others down the road.

I never suggested that we are the only creature trying to survive in a competitive environment which must be subdued by us before we can dominate it.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 10:53 AM   #23
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 8,068
Default

This debate is working out to be more interesting than the moderated debate...
Starshark is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 03:11 PM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default PEANUT GALLERY: Pervy vs. Bible John - Does the Bible strongly condemn homosexuality?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
I would say never mind what the bible says on this and look at God as the first cause of creation wherein God is the leading edge of creation. With God being the first cause we become the second cause as co-creator and that does not speak well for homosexuals wherein the polar opposites are missing to be co-creator with God. Would this not be how God speaks to us?
Which God do you have in mind? Many heterosexuals are not co-creators with God, some who do not choose to have children, and some because they are unable to have children. Is it also your position that that does not speak well for bi-sexuals? Are you not aware that lesbians can bear children, and if necessary could sustain the continuation of the human race? Are you claiming that the only moral and valuable people in society are people who procreate? If you had a teenage son who was considering practicing a homosexual lifestyle, what would you tell him? If you had homosexual urges, and not any heterosexual urges, would you practice homosexuality? Do you have any friends who are homosexuals? Do you avoid people who you know are homosexuals?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 03:17 PM   #25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nice Squirrel
Um pardon me, but we Liberal Christians can be considered of greater Faith than any Literalist. We are not cowering in apologetics and misgarbled translations of disjointed out of context passages in attempts to prove obidience like a beaten child, but wear our Faith on our shoulders and bear it on our backs through love, faith, hope and charity and worship through acts as well as thoughts. And sin is more than what is listed in the Bible and biblical texts.

Sorry folks, I was rubbed the wrong way by this guy.
Excellently stated. Although I am an atheist, I wish christians were more like this, and not so fundamental.
Timotheus X is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 07:00 PM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Which God do you have in mind? Many heterosexuals are not co-creators with God, some who do not choose to have children, and some because they are unable to have children. Is it also your position that that does not speak well for bi-sexuals? Are you not aware that lesbians can bear children, and if necessary could sustain the continuation of the human race? Are you claiming that the only moral and valuable people in society are people who procreate? If you had a teenage son who was considering practicing a homosexual lifestyle, what would you tell him? If you had homosexual urges, and not any heterosexual urges, would you practice homosexuality? Do you have any friends who are homosexuals? Do you avoid people who you know are homosexuals?
The God of the living, Johnny, by whom life is created ex nihilo to this very day and who's servant we are as man in the image of God. This will be true whether we realize this or not.

It is not mine to tell you to have children or not to have children nor is it mine to say how many children you should have and with whom you should have any or all of these. It would not be good for me, or for you, since you, too, are created in Gods image and that will be true whether you like it or not.

So who am I to judge the essence of God that is yours and yours only to have and to hold until death does you part from that which has been given you right from the start. Not me, that is for sure, but if our ability to have children is not to be counted as one of our own (sic), our willingness to do so is another story for which fathering and mothering are gifts of this same God that seek fulfillment in our response to this call wherein we can be made whole with that which we have been given right from the start. Call it satisfaction, or call it what you wish, but if that is in response to a given, Johnny, to have children is a blessing and not to want any is a curse upon the same God that gave us life -- and that will also be true whether you recognize this or not.

Now don't come back and tell me that I never answered your questions because fathering is a gift for fathers and mothering is a gift for mothers who's qualities are opposite and not to be met in the middle where both will be neutered for good reason to prove that life itself belongs to father God.

The next thing I would say that it is not good enough for us to have children just to sustain the human race, nor is it a good idea to spread our gene pool among the living if we are not able or willing to sustain those that are ours. Such an act would bastardize our children, would it not? and if that is possible it is sufficient proof that we belong . . . as if we are the fruit of a vine, no more but also no less, with a meaning and purpose in life.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 08:58 PM   #27
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: philippines
Posts: 14
Default

god made man.
god loves man. (and hates women)
therefor god is a homo
wakwak is offline  
Old 11-09-2005, 05:04 AM   #28
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Does the Bible strongly condemn homosexuality?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
The God of the living, Johnny, by whom life is created ex nihilo to this very day and who's servant we are as man in the image of God. This will be true whether we realize this or not.
But which God? Have you ever met him? What is his specific identity, and do you know what he is really like and what he wants you to do with your life? Did he create Hurricane Katrina and cause it to go ashore on the Gulf coast?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
It is not mine to tell you to have children or not to have children nor is it mine to say how many children you should have and with whom you should have any or all of these. It would not be good for me, or for you, since you, too, are created in Gods image and that will be true whether you like it or not.

So who am I to judge the essence of God that is yours and yours only to have and to hold until death does you part from that which has been given you right from the start. Not me, that is for sure, but if our ability to have children is not to be counted as one of our own (sic), our willingness to do so is another story for which fathering and mothering are gifts of this same God.......
A gift from an unknown God who you can't communicate with, right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
...that seek fulfillment in our response to this call wherein we can be made whole with that which we have been given right from the start.
Why do you presume to speak for your unknown God? He has never made a public appearance and said "Thou shalt procreate if you are able to procreate, and as long as you can properly take care of your children." Some people do not feel fulfilled by having children, and they have every right not to have children if that is their wish. If some God opposes this, then let him make a public appearance and say so himself.

This is a thread about homosexuality, and yet you completely avoided replying to my comments about homosexuality. Why was that? I said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by JS
If you had a teenage son who was considering practicing a homosexual lifestyle, what would you tell him? If you had homosexual urges, and not any heterosexual urges, would you practice homosexuality? Do you have any friends who are homosexuals? Do you avoid people who you know are homosexuals?
Please answer my questions.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 11-12-2005, 02:59 AM   #29
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 139
Default

Is anyone surprised that "Bible John" seems to have missed the deadline again?
SonOfFred is offline  
Old 11-12-2005, 06:39 PM   #30
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 143
Default

Edit

Evilicious, I understand the sentiment but please don't take the bait.

DtC, Moderator, BC&H
Evilicious is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.