FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-23-2005, 04:33 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
Default

It also seems that people are forgetting that Hebrew didn't have a gender-neutral pronoun. God HAD to either be male or female.
Zeichman is offline  
Old 04-23-2005, 11:00 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Zeichman, once again, tradition.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 04-23-2005, 11:18 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeichman
It also seems that people are forgetting that Hebrew didn't have a gender-neutral pronoun. God HAD to either be male or female.
But other religions have gods with both male and female characteristics. Certainly, Hebrew must have a word for hermaphrodites. It just seems that a perfect god should have all human characteristics--assuming of course that human beings were created in her/his image.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-24-2005, 12:02 AM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
But other religions have gods with both male and female characteristics. Certainly, Hebrew must have a word for hermaphrodites. It just seems that a perfect god should have all human characteristics--assuming of course that human beings were created in her/his image.
His image and she provides the material to do this with. She the fertile womb of man and is therefore called woman. There is also a difference between gods and God wherein the lesser gods are the playground for God: ". . . playing on the surface of the earth; and I found delight in the sons of men (Prov.9:31).
Chili is offline  
Old 04-24-2005, 01:34 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: .............
Posts: 2,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
How about: a masculine God is a good match for mother earth.
Yes! And fits well with Panentheism too
Evoken is offline  
Old 04-24-2005, 06:51 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
But other religions have gods with both male and female characteristics. Certainly, Hebrew must have a word for hermaphrodites. It just seems that a perfect god should have all human characteristics--assuming of course that human beings were created in her/his image.
Genesis 1:27 - The first creation story has God creating man and woman in his image, thus the both male/female qualities of him, but they still used masculine pronoun. And although my knowledge of Hebrew is limited, I don't believe I've ever come across a word for "hermaphrodite." Maybe spin can help us out there.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 04-24-2005, 08:03 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
And although my knowledge of Hebrew is limited, I don't believe I've ever come across a word for "hermaphrodite." Maybe spin can help us out there.
There is a word in Rabbinic Hebrew tumtum for someone of mixed sexual characteristics but IIUC it is not found in the OT.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 04-24-2005, 08:14 AM   #28
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
Default


"As more and more Christians seem to regard god as being genderless,
why couldn't god have sent his only begotten daughter, with or without
his only begotten son, to save mankind? Why the favoritism?",

John A. Broussard


I just read this chapter yesterday and it stunned me regarding
sexuality. This was written almost two thousand years ago (as opposed
to this century) The Clementine Homilies are wordy and boring, but you can find a few gems. Book III is about gender.

offa
offa is offline  
Old 04-24-2005, 10:28 AM   #29
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 22
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
As more and more Christians seem to regard god as being genderless, why couldn't god have sent his only begotten daughter, with or without his only begotten son, to save mankind? Why the favoritism?
I'm not sure I understand the question fully. Do you ask why did god show favoritism? Or do you ask if man showed favoritism in the way the myth was concieved?
sMacK is offline  
Old 04-24-2005, 11:44 AM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sMacK
I'm not sure I understand the question fully. Do you ask why did god show favoritism? Or do you ask if man showed favoritism in the way the myth was concieved?
You've got a good point. Let's split it into three questions.

Why did god choose to send a son rather than a daughter?

Why was the myth conceived in such a fashion as to have a male be a divine figure, rather than a female, as in other religions?

Why does such a thoroughly sexist myth continue to have so many adherents?
John A. Broussard is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:00 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.