FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2006, 10:47 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman
The house is question is presumed to be a christian church by analysis of the the art work depicted in the alleged baptistry. However we again see "The Shepherd" and not "The Christian". The argument that the house in question is not a christian church perhaps as yet has not been made.
IMO the pictures normally understood as of Jesus curing a paralytic and Jesus and Peter walking on the water are difficult to interpret in a non-Christian sense.

There are also some written Christian graffiti in the church.

TON ChRIS MNHSKESTE SISEON TON TAPINON

TON ChN IN hUMEIN MN[H]SKESThE [....PR]OKLOU


(the bits in bold being nomina sacra for Christ and Christ Jesus)

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 03-31-2006, 03:39 PM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default index of historical evidence of christianity prior to Constantine

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
IMO the pictures normally understood as of Jesus curing a paralytic and Jesus and Peter walking on the water are difficult to interpret in a non-Christian sense.
The two figures could be Apollonius and Damis. They could be anyone, and that they indeed represent a christian motif is simply an assertion of artistic appreciation, and nothing to do with historical evidence IMO.

Quote:
There are also some written Christian graffiti in the church.
TON ChRIS MNHSKESTE SISEON TON TAPINON
TON ChN IN hUMEIN MN[H]SKESThE [....PR]OKLOU


(the bits in bold being nomina sacra for Christ and Christ Jesus)
That the city ceased being a city at the seige in 256 is reasonable. That no individuals or small groups entered the city from the desert for shelter in any of the centuries after the seige is not reasonable. The graffiti could have been written after 312 CE, and the assertion that it was written prior to this date cannot be firmly established.

I have gathered up all the exceptional historical evidence by which it may be asserted (outside of the literature of Eusebius) that the tribe of christians was extant prior to Constantine. It is indexed at the following page, and I have attempted to answer this evidence at related pages.

http://www.mountainman.com.au/essenes/article_070.htm

I would be grateful for any comments, or further claims of historical evidence outside of Eusebius for anything christian prior to Constantine.



Pete Brown
www.mountainman.com.au
mountainman is offline  
Old 03-31-2006, 03:53 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Is anyone buying this nonsense?
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 03-31-2006, 04:21 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse
Is anyone buying this nonsense?
It reminds me of the views of Jean Hardouin, S.J., (1646-1729), who argued that most of classical and patristic literature had actually been forged by 14th-cen. monks.

Stephen
S.C.Carlson is offline  
Old 03-31-2006, 04:46 PM   #35
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default considering the implications of a eusebian fiction postulate

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.C.Carlson
It reminds me of the views of Jean Hardouin, S.J., (1646-1729), who argued that most of classical and patristic literature had actually been forged by 14th-cen. monks.
Stephen
And also, more recently, of the view of Edwin Johnson in his "Antiqua Mater: A Study of Christian Origins" in which he writes:

"[the fourth century was] the great age of literary forgery,
the extent of which has yet to be exposed"

...[and]...

"not until the mass of inventions
labelled 'Eusebius' shall be exposed,
can the pretended references to Christians
in Pagan writers of the first three centuries
be recognized for the forgeries they are."




Pete Brown
http://www.mountainman.com.au/essenes/article_007.htm
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-01-2006, 12:35 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.C.Carlson
It reminds me of the views of Jean Hardouin, S.J., (1646-1729), who argued that most of classical and patristic literature had actually been forged by 14th-cen. monks.
Hardouin's ideas do get repeated online sometimes, so are not quite dead.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.