FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-19-2013, 03:16 PM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post

I am afraid that you do not know what you are talking about. Here are the statistics of the use of the term in the 1st -3rd century.


Century: A.D. 1
Novum Testamentum: 3
Flavius Josephus Hist.: 1

Clemens Romanus Theol. et : 30
Ignatius Scr. Eccl.: 19
Matches in this century: 53
-----------------------------------------
Century: A.D. 2
Lucianus Soph.: 7
Aelius Herodianus et Pseud: 1
Acta Et Martyrium Apollonii: 6
Acta Joannis: 3
Acta Justini Et Septem Soda: 44
Cassius Dio Hist.: 12
Acta Pauli: 5
Acta Petri: 1
Martyrium Carpi, Papyli Et : 6
Acta Scillitanorum Martyrum: 5
Pseudo-Galenus Med.: 1
Clemens Alexandrinus Theol: 37
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus : 1
Justinus Martyr Apol.: 58
Anonymus Ad Avircium Marcel: 1
Apocalypsis Joannis: 2
Aristides Apol.: 5
Athenagoras Apol.: 6
Celsus Phil.: 57
Didache XII Apostolorum: 1
Epistula Ad Diognetum: 14
Epistula Ecclesiarum Apud L: 10
Hegesippus Scr. Eccl.: 1
Irenaeus Theol.: 5
Marci Aurelii Epistula: 9
Martyrium Polycarpi: 5
Martyrium Ptolemaei Et Luci: 8
Theophilus Apol.: 7
Montanus et Montanistae : 1
Origenes Theol.: 473
Martyrium Ignatii: 9
Matches in this century: 801



Century: A.D. 3
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: 56
Martyrium Potamiaenae Et Ba: 1
Martyrium Marini: 2
Passio Perpetuae Et Felicit: 3
Porphyrius Phil.: 15
Acta Thomae: 3
Gregorius Thaumaturgus Scr: 2
Hippolytus Scr. Eccl.: 13
Acta Xanthippae Et Polyxena: 2
Petrus Scr. Eccl. et Theol: 2
Zosimus Alchem.: 2
Matches in this century: 101
Your post does not really address the OP or the flawed statement of Andrew that the Pauline writings were early because they do not mention Christians.
My post addresses your claim that we cannot find the words "Christian" or "Christians" within any writing dated to the second century.

Quote:
Giving a long list of copies of writings that may be in a far worse condition than the very Pauline letters is of very little use in this thread.

Many, many of the writings you listed are considered either internally inconsistent, manipulated, forgeries, questionable or false attribution or Anonymous and of unknown date of authorship.
Leaving aside the question of which ones are what you say they are (do you know, how does any of what you claim above work against the fact that one can and does find the word Christian(s) within them.

Quote:
I no longer accept presumptions as evidence especially when there is no corroboration from antiquity.
And just what would "corroboration from antiquity" be that in your eyes would demonstrate that the word Christian or Christians is used in these texts?

Are you actually calling me a liar when I say that the word Christian or Christians appears the texts noted above?

What evidence can you bring forth to show that these words do not appear in, say, the Letters attributed to Marcus Aurelius or Cassius Dio?

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 05:20 PM   #72
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
...Your post does not really address the OP or the flawed statement of Andrew that the Pauline writings were early because they do not mention Christians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
My post addresses your claim that we cannot find the words "Christian" or "Christians" within any writing dated to the second century...
You do not know what you are talking about!! I did not make such a claim.

I am extremely disturbed when you make blatant erroneous statements.


Please, my argument is that copies of supposed 2nd century writings attributed to Christians like Justin and Tatian also do not mention the word Christian.

I actually listed the writings attributed to Justin and Tatian that do not mention Christians.

In fact, these writings attributed to Justin and Tatian do NOT mention even Jesus Christ.

Tatian

1."Discourse to the Greeks"

Justin
1. Hortatory Address to the Greeks

2. On the Resurrection.

3. Discourse to the Greeks.

4. On the Sole Government of God.

Essentially, Andrew's argument that the Pauline writings were 1st century because they do NOT mention Christians is extremely weak.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 05:42 PM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
...Your post does not really address the OP or the flawed statement of Andrew that the Pauline writings were early because they do not mention Christians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
My post addresses your claim that we cannot find the words "Christian" or "Christians" within any writing dated to the second century...
You do not know what you are talking about!! I did not make such a claim.

I am extremely disturbed when you make blatant erroneous statements.


Please, my argument is that copies of supposed 2nd century writings attributed to Christians like Justin and Tatian also do not mention the word Christian.

I actually listed the writings attributed to Justin and Tatian that do not mention Christians.

In fact, these writings attributed to Justin and Tatian do NOT mention even Jesus Christ.

Tatian

1."Discourse to the Greeks"

Justin
1. Hortatory Address to the Greeks

2. On the Resurrection.

3. Discourse to the Greeks.

4. On the Sole Government of God.

Essentially, Andrew's argument that the Pauline writings were 1st century because they do NOT mention Christians is extremely weak.

But other writings attributed to Justin -- in fact one's that you quote from -- do mention Christians.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 06:18 PM   #74
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
You do not know what you are talking about!! I did not make such a claim.

I am extremely disturbed when you make blatant erroneous statements.


Please, my argument is that copies of supposed 2nd century writings attributed to Christians like Justin and Tatian also do not mention the word Christian.

I actually listed the writings attributed to Justin and Tatian that do not mention Christians.

In fact, these writings attributed to Justin and Tatian do NOT mention even Jesus Christ.

Tatian

1."Discourse to the Greeks"

Justin
1. Hortatory Address to the Greeks

2. On the Resurrection.

3. Discourse to the Greeks.

4. On the Sole Government of God.

Essentially, Andrew's argument that the Pauline writings were 1st century because they do NOT mention Christians is extremely weak.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
But other writings attributed to Justin -- in fact one's that you quote from -- do mention Christians.

Jeffrey
Well, that is precisely the point. Some writings attributed to 2nd century writers do NOT mention Christians.

Andrew failed to comprehend that fact.

Supposed copies of 2nd century writings also do not mention the word Christians so it is the weakest of weak claims that the Pauline writings were early merely because they do NOT mention Christians.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 06:42 PM   #75
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
...Your post does not really address the OP or the flawed statement of Andrew that the Pauline writings were early because they do not mention Christians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson
My post addresses your claim that we cannot find the words "Christian" or "Christians" within any writing dated to the second century...
Quote:
You do not know what you are talking about!! I did not make such a claim.
Ah, but you did.

Quote:
Writings from those who called themselves Christians in the 2nd century did not mention Christians even though they supposedly lived 100 years after Nero.
Quote:
I am extremely disturbed when you make blatant erroneous statements.
I fail to see how I have made erroneous statements of any kind, let alone blatant ones.

Quote:
Please, my argument is that copies of supposed 2nd century writings attributed to Christians like Justin and Tatian also do not mention the word Christian.
And I provided you with the names of 2nd century Christian (and non Christian) writings in which the term "Christians" appear. So your "argument" is wrong.


Quote:
I actually listed the writings attributed to Justin and Tatian that do not mention Christians.
So what? Justin wrote more than the works you listed. And even you, limited as you are in your English vocabulary, do not use all the words you know in everything you post here.

Quote:
In fact, these writings attributed to Justin and Tatian do NOT mention even Jesus Christ.
Now you've changed the terms of the game. Before it was the term ""Christians" . Now it's "Jesus Christ".

Quote:


Tatian

1."Discourse to the Greeks"

Justin
1. Hortatory Address to the Greeks

2. On the Resurrection.

3. Discourse to the Greeks.

4. On the Sole Government of God.
And as to your new claim -- Sorry, but you are wrong again.

Tatianus
Apol.
Tatianus Apol., Diatesseron
Line 10

ὀ]ψ̣ίας δὲ γενομένης ἐπὶ τ̣[ῇ Π]α̣ρ̣[α]ς-
[κευῇ], v ὅ ἐστιν Προσάββατον, προς-
[ῆλθεν] ἄνθρωπος βουλευτὴ̣[ς ὑ]π̣ά̣ρ-
[χων ἀ]π̣ὸ̣ Ἐρινμαθαία[ς] π̣[ό]λ̣ε̣ω̣ς τῆς
[Ἰουδαί]ας, ὄνομα Ἰω[σήφ], ἀ[γ]αθὸς δί-
[καιος], ὢν μαθητὴς τ̣[ο]ῦ̣ Ἰη(σοῦ), κ̣ε̣ – vvvv
[κρυμ]μ̣ένος δὲ διὰ τ̣ὸ̣ν̣ φό̣βον τ̣ῶν
[Ἰουδαίω]ν, καὶ αὐτὸς προσεδέχετο
[τὴν] v β̣[ασιλείαν] τοῦ̣ Θ(εο)ῦ.



Searching in the following:
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Oratio ad gentiles
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Cohortatio ad gentiles
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: De monarchia
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Epistula ad Diognetum
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: De resurrectione
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Expositio rectae fidei
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Epistula ad Zenam et Serenum
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Confutatio dogmatum quorundam Aristotelicorum
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Quaestiones Christianorum ad gentiles
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Quaestiones gentilium ad Christianos
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr: Fragmenta
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Cohortatio ad gentiles
Morel page 36, section C, line 2

Πλὴν ἀλλ' ἐπειδήπερ, ὦ ἄνδρες Ἕλληνες, οὐκ ἐν ποιη-
τικοῖς μέτροις τὰ τῆς ἀληθοῦς θεοσεβείας πράγματα οὐδὲ ἐν
τῇ παρ' ὑμῖν εὐδοκιμούσῃ παιδεύσει, ἀφέμενοι λοιπὸν τῆς τῶν
μέτρων καὶ λόγων ἀκριβείας, τοῖς ὑπ' αὐτῆς εἰρημένοις ἀφι-
λονείκως προσέχοντες γνῶτε πόσων ὑμῖν ἀγαθῶν αἰτία ἔσται,
τὴν τοῦ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ ἄφιξιν σαφῶς καὶ φανε-
ρῶς προαγορεύουσα· ὃς τοῦ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων λόγος ἀχώρητος
δυνάμει, τὸν κατ' εἰκόνα θεοῦ καὶ ὁμοίωσιν πλασθέντα ἀνα-
λαβὼν ἄνθρωπον, τῆς τῶν ἀρχαίων ἡμᾶς προγόνων ἀνέμνησε
θεοσεβείας, ἣν οἱ ἐξ αὐτῶν γενόμενοι ἄνθρωποι καταλιπόντες
διδασκαλίᾳ βασκάνου δαίμονος ἐπὶ τὴν τῶν μὴ θεῶν ἐτράπη-
σαν θρησκείαν.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Cohortatio ad gentiles
Morel page 37, section A, line 2

Εἰ τοίνυν, ὦ ἄνδρες Ἕλληνες,
μὴ προτιμοτέραν ἡγεῖσθε τῆς ὑμῶν αὐτῶν σωτηρίας τὴν περὶ
τῶν μὴ ὄντων θεῶν ψευδῆ φαντασίαν, πείσθητε, ὥσπερ ἔφην,
τῇ ἀρχαιοτάτῃ καὶ σφόδρα παλαιᾷ Σιβύλλῃ, ἧς τὰς βίβλους ἐν
πάσῃ τῇ οἰκουμένῃ σώζεσθαι συμβαίνει, περὶ μὲν τῶν λεγο-
μένων θεῶν ὡς μὴ ὄντων ἀπό τινος δυνατῆς ἐπιπνοίας διὰ
χρησμῶν ὑμᾶς διδασκούσῃ, περὶ δὲ τῆς τοῦ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν
Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ μελλούσης ἔσεσθαι παρουσίας καὶ περὶ πάν-
των τῶν ὑπ' αὐτοῦ γίνεσθαι μελλόντων σαφῶς καὶ φανερῶς
προαναφωνούσῃ· ἔσται γὰρ ὑμῖν ἀναγκαῖον προγύμνασμα ἡ
τούτων γνῶσις τῆς τῶν ἱερῶν ἀνδρῶν προφητείας.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, De resurrectione
Morel page 588, section D, line 1

Ἔστι δὲ
οὗτος Ἰησοῦς Χριστός, ὁ σωτὴρ ἡμῶν καὶ δεσπότης· οὗ-
τος τοίνυν αὐτός ἐστιν ἑαυτοῦ τε καὶ τῶν ὅλων πίστις τε
καὶ ἀπόδειξις.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, De resurrectione
Morel page 589, section B, line 4

Εἰσὶ δέ τινες οἳ λέγουσι καὶ αὐτὸν τὸν Ἰη-
σοῦ
ν πνευματικὸν μόνον παρεῖναι, μηκέτι ἐν σαρκί, φαντα-
σίαν δὲ σαρκὸς παρεσχηκέναι, πειρώμενοι καὶ αὐτοὶ ἀπο-
στερεῖν τῆς ἐπαγγελίας τὴν σάρκα.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, De resurrectione
Morel page 589, section E, line 4

Καὶ ὁ κύ-
ριος δὲ ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦς ὁ Χριστὸς οὐ δι' ἄλλο τι ἐκ παρθένου
ἐγεννήθη, ἀλλ' ἵνα καταργήσῃ γέννησιν ἐπιθυμίας ἀνόμου
καὶ δείξῃ τῷ ἄρχοντι καὶ δίχα συνουσίας ἀνθρωπίνης δυνα-
τὴν εἶναι τῷ θεῷ τὴν ἀνθρώπου πλάσιν.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, De resurrectione
Morel page 593, section E, line 8

Ἀλλὰ ἀγαθός ἐστι καὶ σώζεσθαι πάντας θέλει· καὶ δὴ
αὐτοῦ καὶ τοῦ κηρύγματος αὐτοῦ οὐχὶ μόνον ἤκουσεν ἡ ψυχὴ
ἡμῶν καὶ σὺν αὐτῇ ἡ σάρξ, καὶ ἐπίστευσαν εἰς Χριστὸν Ἰη-
σοῦ
ν, ἀλλ' ἀμφότερα ἐλούσαντο καὶ ἀμφότερα τὴν δικαιοσύνην
εἰργάσαντο.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, De resurrectione
Morel page 595, section E, line 3

Εἰ δὲ ὁ ἡμέτερος ἰα-
τρὸς Ἰησοῦς ὁ Χριστός, ἀπὸ τῶν ἐπιθυμιῶν ἡμῶν ἀπο-
σπάσας, διαιτᾶται τῇ κατ' αὐτὸν σώφρονι καὶ ἐγκρατεῖ
διαίτῃ τὴν σάρκα ἡμῶν, δῆλον ὡς ἐλπίδα σωτηρίας ἔχουσαν
ἀπὸ τῶν ἁμαρτημάτων αὐτὴν φυλάσσει, καθάπερ τοὺς ἐλ-
πίδα σωτηρίας ἔχοντας ἀνθρώπους οἱ ἰατροὶ οὐκ ἐῶσιν ὑπη-
ρετεῖν ταῖς ἡδοναῖς.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Expositio rectae fidei
Morel page 375, section C, line 4

Ὁμοίως
δὲ καὶ ὁ μακάριος Παῦλος, θείῳ πυρὶ κάτοχος ὢν καὶ τὸ δια-
καὲς τῆς περὶ τὸν θεὸν ἀγάπης ἐνδεικνύμενος καὶ τὸ βέ-
βαιον τοῦ φίλτρου μαρτυρούμενος, οὕτως φησίν· Πέ-
πεισμαι γὰρ ὅτι οὔτε ζωὴ οὔτε κόσμος οὔτε θάνατος, οὔτε
ἄγγελοι οὔτε δυνάμεις οὔτε ἀρχαί, οὔτε ἐνεστῶτα οὔτε μέλ-
λοντα, οὔτε ὕψωμα οὔτε βάθος οὔτε τις κτίσις ἑτέρα δυνή-
σεται ἡμᾶς χωρίσαι ἀπὸ τῆς ἀγάπης τοῦ θεοῦ τῆς ἐν Χριστῷ
Ἰησοῦ τῷ κυρίῳ ἡμῶν.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Expositio rectae fidei
Morel page 376, section A, line 5

Ὁ οὖν κύριος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦς Χριστὸς
μετὰ τὴν ἐκ νεκρῶν ἀνάστασιν, τὴν εἰς οὐρανοὺς ἄνοδον ποι-
εῖσθαι μέλλων, καὶ τὴν τῶν ἐθνῶν μαθητείαν καὶ τὴν τοῦ
βαπτίσματος διδαχὴν τοὺς ἀποστόλους ἐπαίδευσεν· Πορευ-
θέντες μαθητεύσατε πάντα τὰ ἔθνη, βαπτίζοντες αὐτοὺς εἰς
τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ πατρὸς καὶ τοῦ υἱοῦ καὶ τοῦ ἁγίου πνεύματος.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Expositio rectae fidei
Morel page 376, section B, line 3

Καὶ Κορινθίοις δὲ γράφων ὁ μακάριος Παῦλος τῷ τέλει τῆς
ἐπιστολῆς, οἱονεὶ σφραγῖδά τινα τῇ διδασκαλίᾳ περιτιθείς,
ἐπάγει· Ἡ χάρις τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ καὶ ἡ ἀγάπη
τοῦ θεοῦ καὶ πατρὸς καὶ ἡ κοινωνία τοῦ ἁγίου πνεύματος
μετὰ πάντων ὑμῶν.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Expositio rectae fidei
Morel page 376, section B, line 6

Καὶ πάλιν πρὸς Ἐφεσίους οὕτως φη-
σίν· Ὄντος ἀκρογωνιαίου αὐτοῦ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, ἐν ᾧ πᾶσα
οἰκοδομὴ συναρμολογουμένη αὔξει εἰς ναὸν ἅγιον ἐν κυρίῳ, ἐν
ᾧ καὶ ὑμεῖς συνοικοδομεῖσθε εἰς κατοικητήριον τοῦ θεοῦ ἐν
πνεύματι.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Expositio rectae fidei
Morel page 376, section C, line 7

Καὶ τοῦτο δῆλον ἀφ' ὧν
καὶ ἐν ἑτέρῳ φησίν· Τούτου χάριν κάμπτω τὰ γόνατά
μου πρὸς τὸν πατέρα τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, ἐξ
οὗ πᾶσα πατριὰ ἐν οὐρανοῖς καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς ὀνομάζεται, ἵνα
δῴη ὑμῖν κατὰ τὸν πλοῦτον τῆς δόξης αὐτοῦ δυνάμει κρα-
ταιωθῆναι διὰ τοῦ πνεύματος αὐτοῦ εἰς τὸν ἔσω ἄνθρωπον,
κατοικῆσαι τὸν Χριστόν.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Epistula ad Zenam et Serenum
Morel page 514, section B, line 1

Γυνὴ δ' ἐστὶν ἀδελφὴ μὲν πᾶσα, τοῦ δὲ πλησίον εἴ-
ρηται γυνή, τοῦτ' ἔστιν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ τοῦ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν
(ὅντινα μετὰ τὴν πρὸς θεὸν καὶ πατέρα τῶν ὅλων ἀγάπην,
ὅτι πλησίον ἐστὶν αὐτοῦ, τιμητέον καὶ ἀγαπητέον), ὡς Παῦ-
λος· Ἡρμοσάμην, λέγει, πάντας ὑμᾶς ἑνὶ ἀνδρί, παρθένον
ἁγνὴν παραστῆσαι τῷ Χριστῷ.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 414, section B, line 8

Ἐπειδὴ διάφοροι φῆμαι περὶ ὧν ἐποιήσατο θαυμάτων ὁ
Ἰησοῦς διέτρεχον, τῶν μὲν λεγόντων· Ἡλίας ἐστὶν ὁ ταῦτα
ποιῶν, τῶν δέ· Ἱερεμίας, τῶν δέ· Ἄλλος τις τῶν προφητῶν,
ταύτας τὰς φήμας ἀκούων ὁ Ἰωάννης ἐν τῇ εἱρκτῇ πέμπει τοὺς
μαθητὰς αὑτοῦ μαθεῖν, εἰ ὁ τὰ σημεῖα ποιῶν αὐτός ἐστιν
ὁ ὑπ' αὐτοῦ μαρτυρηθείς, ἢ ἕτερός τις ὁ παρὰ τῶν πολλῶν
θρυλλούμενος.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 414, section C, line 5

Γνοὺς δὲ ὁ Ἰησοῦς τοῦ Ἰωάννου τὸν σκοπὸν
ἐπὶ τῆς παρουσίας τῶν μαθητῶν Ἰωάννου ἐποίησε πολλὰ
θαύματα, πείθων αὐτοὺς καὶ τὸν Ἰωάννην δι' αὐτῶν, ὡς αὐτὸς
εἴη ὁ πεποιηκὼς καὶ τὰ ἐπ' ὀνόματι ἑτέρων φημιζόμενα θαύ-
ματα, ὁ ὑπ' αὐτοῦ μαρτυρηθείς.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 418, section C, line 6

Καθάπερ Ἰησοῦς, ὁ τοῦ Ναυῆ, μέλλων
κατ' αὐθεντίαν ἡλίῳ καὶ σελήνῃ προστάσσειν τὴν στάσιν,
λαμβάνει τοῦ Ἰησοῦ τὸ ὑπὸ τῆς κτίσεως τῇ ὑπακοῇ τοῦ
προστάγματος τιμώμενον, οὕτως καὶ ὁ Ἰεζεκιὴλ λαμβάνει τοῦ
υἱοῦ τοῦ ἀνθρώπου τὸ ὄνομα καὶ διὰ τῆς ὀπτασίας ἐγείρει τοὺς
νεκροὺς τῇ δυνάμει τοῦ προσρήματος.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 429, section C, line 8

Φησὶ γὰρ Ματθαῖος
ὁ εὐαγγελιστὴς οὕτως· Πρωΐας δὲ γενομένης συμβούλιον ἔλα-
βον πάντες οἱ ἀρχιερεῖς καὶ οἱ πρεσβύτεροι τοῦ λαοῦ κατὰ τοῦ
Ἰησοῦ, ὅπως θανατώσωσιν αὐτόν· καὶ δήσαντες αὐτὸν ἀπή-
γαγον καὶ παρέδωκαν αὐτὸν Ποντίῳ Πιλάτῳ τῷ ἡγεμόνι.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 429, section D, line 3

Ὡσαύτως δὲ καὶ Ἰωάννης ὁ εὐαγγελιστής φησιν· Ἄγουσι
τὸν Ἰησοῦν ἀπὸ τοῦ Καϊάφα εἰς τὸ πραιτώριον· ἦν δὲ πρωΐ.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 429, section D, line 5

Καὶ πάλιν· Ὁ Πιλάτος οὖν ἀκούσας τούτων τῶν λόγων ἤγα-
γεν ἔξω τὸν Ἰησοῦν, καὶ ἐκάθισεν ἐπὶ τοῦ βήματος εἰς τόπον
λεγόμενον Λιθόστρωτον, ἑβραϊστὶ δὲ Γαββαθᾶ· ἦν δὲ παρα-
σκευὴ τοῦ πάσχα, ὥρα δὲ ὡσεὶ ἕκτη.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 436, section A, line 3

Εἰ τῆς παρούσης καταστάσεως τὸ τέλος ἐστὶν ἡ διὰ τοῦ
πυρὸς κρίσις τῶν ἀσεβῶν, καθά φασιν αἱ γραφαὶ προφητῶν
τε καὶ ἀποστόλων, ἔτι δὲ καὶ τῆς Σιβύλλης, καθώς φησιν
ὁ μακάριος Κλήμης ἐν τῇ πρὸς Κορινθίους ἐπιστολῇ, γίνε-
ται δὲ αὕτη ἡ κρίσις διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ τοῦ σταυρωθέντος
ὑπὸ τῶν Ἰουδαίων, τοῦ αἰωνίως βασιλεύοντος τῶν Χριστιανῶν
βασιλείαν ἀτελεύτητον, τὴν κατὰ τὸν προφήτην Δανιὴλ δο-
θεῖσαν αὐτῷ, διὰ τοῦτο οὐδεμίαν ἀνακλήσεως ἔχει ὁ ἑλληνισμὸς
τὴν ἐλπίδα.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 443, section D, line 5

Καὶ καθάπερ, ὅταν εἴπῃ ἡ θεία γραφή· Ὁ ἐγείρας τὸν κύ-
ριον ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν ἐκ τῶν νεκρῶν ζωοποιήσει τὰς ψυ-
χὰς καὶ τὰ σώματα ἡμῶν, οὔτε ἀτελῆ λέγει τὴν ἀνάστασιν οὔτε
φαντασίας δίδωσιν ὑπόνοιαν, ἀλλὰ τελείαν ἀναστάσεως τὴν
πίστιν, οὕτως καί, ὅταν λέγῃ· Ἠγέρθη πολλὰ σώματα τῶν
κεκοιμημένων ἁγίων ἐκ νεκρῶν, τὴν τελείαν λέγει ἀνάστασιν.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 445, section B, line 3

Οὐδὲν οὖν ἦν
θαυμαστόν, εἰ καὶ ὁ Ἡρώδης μετὰ τὴν ἀναίρεσιν τοῦ Ἰωάννου
ἀκούει τὰ ἔργα τῶν μαθητῶν τοῦ Ἰησοῦ, τὰ ἐπ' ὀνόματι τοῦ
Ἰησοῦ γεγονότα· τότε γὰρ ἤκουσεν ὁ Ἡρώδης τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ Ἰη-
σοῦ
, ὅτε ἀπέστειλεν ὁ Ἰησοῦς τοὺς μαθητὰς αὑτοῦ εἰς τὰς
κώμας καὶ πόλεις κηρύττειν τὴν μετάνοιαν καὶ θεραπεύειν τὰς
νόσους, καθά φησι Μάρκος ὁ εὐαγγελιστής.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 445, section B, line 9

Καὶ γὰρ αὐτὸς
ὁ Ἰωάννης πρὸ τῆς ἐγέρσεως τοῦ υἱοῦ τῆς χήρας οὐκ ἦν ἀκού-
σας πάντα ὅσα ἐποίησεν ὁ Ἰησοῦς ἐν τῇ Γαλιλαίᾳ τε καὶ τῇ
Ἱερουσαλήμ, καίτοι πολλῶν ὄντων τῶν ἤδη γεγενημένων ὑπὸ
τοῦ σωτῆρος θαυμάτων, καὶ πρὸ τοῦ βληθῆναι τὸν Ἰωάννην
εἰς φυλακὴν καὶ μετὰ τὸ βληθῆναι αὐτὸν εἰς φυλακήν· τότε
γὰρ ἀπέστειλε τοὺς μαθητὰς αὑτοῦ ὁ Ἰωάννης πρὸς τὸν Ἰη-
σοῦ
ν μαθεῖν, εἰ αὐτὸς εἶ ὁ προσδοκώμενος ἐλθεῖν.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones et responsiones ad orthodoxos
Morel page 474, section A, line 1

Ἀνεχώρησε, φησίν, ὁ Ἰησοῦς εἰς τὴν Γαλιλαίαν· οὐ γὰρ ἤθε-
λεν ἐν τῇ Ἰουδαίᾳ περιπατεῖν, ὅτι οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι ἐζήτουν αὐτὸν
ἀποκτεῖναι.
Go to Context


Pseudo-Justinus Martyr, Quaestiones gentilium ad Christianos
Morel page 204, section C, line 8

Οὐ γὰρ
ἂν ἦν τὰ ὄντα, μὴ τοῦ θεοῦ προϋπάρχοντος αὐτῶν, τοῦ πάντα
τὰ μέρη τῆς κτίσεως χρειωδῶς πρὸς λυσιτέλειαν τῆς ὅλης κτί-
σεως ὑποστησαμένου, τοῦ ἡμῖν γνωσθέντος διὰ προῤῥήσεως
καὶ διδασκαλίας προφητῶν τε καὶ τοῦ κυρίου καὶ σωτῆρος
ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ καὶ τῶν αὐτοῦ ἀποστόλων λόγοις θείαις
δυνάμεσι μεμαρτυρημένοις.
Go to Context




Quote:
Essentially, Andrew's argument that the Pauline writings were 1st century because they do NOT mention Christians is extremely weak.

But other writings attributed to Justin -- in fact one's that you quote from -- do mention Christians.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 07:23 PM   #76
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
...Your post does not really address the OP or the flawed statement of Andrew that the Pauline writings were early because they do not mention Christians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew criddle
Onr argument for a 1st century CE date for the letters attributed to Paul is that they do not use the word Christian or derivatives.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
Essentially, Andrew's argument that the Pauline writings were 1st century because they do NOT mention Christians is extremely weak.
Quote:
But other writings attributed to Justin -- in fact one's that you quote from -- do mention Christians.

Jeffrey
I have specifically identified writings attributed to supposed 2nd century writings that do not mention the words Christians, or Christ.

Andrew's argument is hopelessly flawed. Writings without the words Christian and Christ are NOT indications that they were composed in the 1st century.

Andrew's flawed position would mean that writings attributed to Justin and Tatian were composed in the 1st century.


1. Tatian's Address to the Greeks" --- No mention of the words Christians and Christ.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...n-address.html

2. Justin's Discourse to the Greeks---No mention of the words Christ and Christians.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...discourse.html

3. Justin's On the Resurrection--No mention of the word Christians.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...urrection.html

4. Justin's On the Sole Government of God---No mention of the words Christians or Christ.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...rtyr-sole.html

5. Justin's Hortatory Address to the Greeks---No mention of the word Christians.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...hortatory.html
aa5874 is offline  
Old 04-20-2013, 06:36 AM   #77
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
And about the term Christianoi. How do you explain the apostles gathering together in Antioch and using a name derived from Latin - Christianus? I've never understood that. I am not being difficult. I just find it odd.

I have an answer to this question, but you would not like it.
Just go away. No one cares what you have to say.

You are very predictable Stephan.







εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 08:12 AM   #78
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Let's address the questions whether "Christian" texts that do not mention Christians or Jesus were even originally written by Christians at all, as opposed to being adopted and sometimes adapted for the purposes of the new religion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
...Your post does not really address the OP or the flawed statement of Andrew that the Pauline writings were early because they do not mention Christians.




Quote:
But other writings attributed to Justin -- in fact one's that you quote from -- do mention Christians.

Jeffrey
I have specifically identified writings attributed to supposed 2nd century writings that do not mention the words Christians, or Christ.

Andrew's argument is hopelessly flawed. Writings without the words Christian and Christ are NOT indications that they were composed in the 1st century.

Andrew's flawed position would mean that writings attributed to Justin and Tatian were composed in the 1st century.


1. Tatian's Address to the Greeks" --- No mention of the words Christians and Christ.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...n-address.html

2. Justin's Discourse to the Greeks---No mention of the words Christ and Christians.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...discourse.html

3. Justin's On the Resurrection--No mention of the word Christians.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...urrection.html

4. Justin's On the Sole Government of God---No mention of the words Christians or Christ.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...rtyr-sole.html

5. Justin's Hortatory Address to the Greeks---No mention of the word Christians.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.co...hortatory.html
Duvduv is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 10:48 PM   #79
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Let's address the questions whether "Christian" texts that do not mention Christians or Jesus were even originally written by Christians at all, as opposed to being adopted and sometimes adapted for the purposes of the new religion.
Please address the OP.

I cannot address questions that are not relevant to this thread.

The OP deals specifically with the letters of Paul who was supposedly a Christian after he was blinded by a bright light and heard a voice in his head.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew criddle
Onr argument for a 1st century CE date for the letters attributed to Paul is that they do not use the word Christian or derivatives.....

As I said before based on Acts all the Pauline letters are forgeries or falsely attributed to Saul/Paul if it is claimed Saul/Paul wrote letters to Churches before c 62 CE.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 04-23-2013, 03:20 PM   #80
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Primary residence in New York State
Posts: 231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Onr argument for a 1st century CE date for the letters attributed to Paul is that they do not use the word Christian or derivatives.

On the one hand, we know from Pliny at the latest that the word was customary/standard in the very early 2nd century.
The amount of text in the letters attributed to Paul is too great for the absence of Christian to be a result of chance. Either some at least of the letters were written before the term became customary or it is being avoided.
Avoidance of the term Christian in the Gospels is understandable; the early Church was aware that it would be anachronistic during the ministry of Jesus. However from Acts we discover that it was believed (probably wrongly) that the term went back to the very early Church. Hence the term would not be avoided by a 2nd century pseudo-Paul.
But the term does not appear hence some at least of the Pauline letters are first century.

Andrew Criddle
That would be true if you accept the Paulines at face value. I do not. I think the Pauline author wanted his readers to believe the epistles were written in the first century when they actually were not.
Onias is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:07 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.