FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2008, 11:20 PM   #11
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default

Quote:
The reading of Julius Africanus is obscure and it doesn't say when the birth was. It does seem to indicate in its very contorted way that the conception happened in conjunction with the arrival of "Lady Pege, spring-bearer", ie the spring equinox, March (20th or) 21st, on the understanding that this English translation means the season with the word "spring" (but Pege means "spring/fountain"). Assuming a normal gestation period, we get a birth around Dec 21. This is not in the fragments of his Chronologia but in "Narrative of Events that happened in Persia on the Birth of Christ"...
If THAT is really the source, then the claim is very far from actual quote.

Look at how Britannica puts it, for example:
Quote:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/...5686/Christmas

December 25 was first identified as the date of Jesus’ birth by Sextus Julius Africanus in 221 and later became the universally accepted date.
Could Sextus' dating be overclaimed in Britannica, and subsequently copied by everyone without checking?

Quote:
Is there anything else you'd want to change about the page dating the birth?
Yes, there are more dating clues in bible than just Herod and census. Luke 3:23 says Jesus started preaching at age 30, after being baptized in 15th year of Tiberus, which is quite safely dated to 29. That gives earliest possible birth date 1BC, and conflicts with Herod. Another dating of Luke that apologists have to dismiss.

and one nitpick:
Quote:
In Western Christianity, it has been traditionally celebrated on December 25 as Christmas (in the liturgical season of Christmastide), a date that can be traced as early as 330 among Roman Christians
Why 330? Earliest direct mention of 25th december is AFAIK Chronography of 354
vid is offline  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:44 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
and one nitpick:
Quote:
In Western Christianity, it has been traditionally celebrated on December 25 as Christmas (in the liturgical season of Christmastide), a date that can be traced as early as 330 among Roman Christians
Why 330? Earliest direct mention of 25th december is AFAIK Chronography of 354
Some of the texts in the Chronography predate 354. There are lists of bishops which are not brought up to date iirc, for instance.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 11-05-2008, 01:12 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default Tangent: accessing Cambridge journals

If anyone when Googling comes to a link for journals.cambridge.org that they can't access and if you have a Firefox browser with a Firefox extension called User Agent Switcher, you can set your User Agent to "googlebot" before clicking and you'll gain access.

If you have Firefox you can get the extension from the Mozilla site. After you install it you then have to create a User Agent profile and the definition of the googlebot is:

Googlebot/2.1 (+[url]http://www.google.com/bot.html[/url])

This will tell Cambridge that you are a googlebot doing your usual information gathering. Don't forget to set your User Profile back to "default". (You can also trick sites that want Internet Explorer by setting your User Agent as IE.)



spin
spin is offline  
Old 11-05-2008, 01:17 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
If THAT is really the source, then the claim is very far from actual quote.
I've been through all the fragments and there seems to be nothing else, so on face value it seems that the Britannica article is hopeful and the people who cite it know no better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Yes, there are more dating clues in bible than just Herod and census. Luke 3:23 says Jesus started preaching at age 30, after being baptized in 15th year of Tiberus, which is quite safely dated to 29. That gives earliest possible birth date 1BC, and conflicts with Herod. Another dating of Luke that apologists have to dismiss.
So which Google pages do you see that need improvement regarding the dates?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 11-05-2008, 02:10 AM   #15
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default

Quote:
So which Google pages do you see that need improvement regarding the dates?
I presume you meant wikipedia pages.

I found these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nativity_of_Jesus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_Jesus

I also think the list of comments by ancient christians on date of announciation should be added to following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annunciation
vid is offline  
Old 11-05-2008, 03:49 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Munich Germany
Posts: 434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
If anyone when Googling comes to a link for journals.cambridge.org that they can't access and if you have a Firefox browser with a Firefox extension called User Agent Switcher, you can set your User Agent to "googlebot" before clicking and you'll gain access.

If you have Firefox you can get the extension from the Mozilla site. After you install it you then have to create a User Agent profile and the definition of the googlebot is:

Googlebot/2.1 (+[url]http://www.google.com/bot.html[/url])

This will tell Cambridge that you are a googlebot doing your usual information gathering. Don't forget to set your User Profile back to "default". (You can also trick sites that want Internet Explorer by setting your User Agent as IE.)



spin
Nice hack. Do you have an example document on which we can test it?
squiz is offline  
Old 11-05-2008, 05:47 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Yes, there are more dating clues in bible than just Herod and census. Luke 3:23 says Jesus started preaching at age 30, after being baptized in 15th year of Tiberus, which is quite safely dated to 29. That gives earliest possible birth date 1BC, and conflicts with Herod.
Please note that Luke does not say that Jesus started his ministry at age 30; he says he started ministry at about [ωσει] age 30. This widens the potential dates considerably, and renders Luke 3.23 only broadly useful in establishing a birth date for Jesus.

(Please note also that I am not motivated to point this out in some attempt to reconcile Matthew, Luke, and history. I think they conflict.)

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 11-05-2008, 08:20 AM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default Much Ado About Nothing

Very nice works spin and I know that you can do this well, but might it be said that all this elaboration finds its origin with the Annunciation as a Romantic expression for the onset of menopauze. The rest just comes about on its own and really is "as easy as eating and drinking."
Chili is offline  
Old 11-05-2008, 01:16 PM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Quote:
So which Google pages do you see that need improvement regarding the dates?
I presume you meant wikipedia pages.
Yes, sorry, you're right.

Right. These I'd assumed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Looked through this. I think it does well with the sources, referring to the 354 CE date as the earliest christian celebration of 25 Dec.

I've given notice in the discussion of the page that there are three different birth years supplied for the Matthean date of birth, which I'll probably put between 8-6BCE with the proviso that it could have been earlier.

ETA: In fact, I made the necessary changes.

I can't really see any problem with the birth day information, so what exact would you change?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
I also think the list of comments by ancient christians on date of announciation should be added to following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annunciation
It could be done, sure, but it wouldn't be a priority of mine, because I aimed to reduce the amount of apologetic material on Wiki as my interest. If you want to prepare the material, I guess I could post it on Wiki, if you'd like.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 11-05-2008, 01:19 PM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squiz View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
If anyone when Googling comes to a link for journals.cambridge.org that they can't access and if you have a Firefox browser with a Firefox extension called User Agent Switcher, you can set your User Agent to "googlebot" before clicking and you'll gain access.
Do you have an example document on which we can test it?
This was my Google search:
alice whealey syriac testimonium flavianum
The first item that comes up should be to a Cambridge article.

ETA: The use of the googlebot User Agent is also helpful to some other places that require subscription for ordinary users but free access so that Google can index the material. Some closed forums for example.


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:26 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.