FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-15-2007, 09:41 AM   #51
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
When? Why?

Refusing to sacrifice to the emperor was treason!

And was there a uniform illegality over the centuries?
Where oh where do you get this stuff?

:banghead: :banghead:

Have you ever actually read anything of any merit on the history of persecution of Christians before Constantine?

Fer chirssakes, Cllive, will you please get yourself to a library!!

JG
jgibson000 is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 09:46 AM   #52
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgibson000 View Post
Where oh where do you get this stuff?

:banghead: :banghead:

Have you ever actually read anything of any merit on the history of persecution of Christians before Constantine?

Fer chirssakes, Cllive, will you please get yourself to a library!!

JG
It was of course one sided.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia_of_Alexandria

And the idea of treachery is from Pliny!!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-16-2007, 09:48 AM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
In one of the mysteries of the christian faith Mithraism came about through autogenesis. Synchretic Mithraism didn't develop on the edge of the Parthian empire in places like Commagene, nor was Mithraism popular throughout Asia Minor, despite it being evinced in the royal name Mithridates in various kingdoms. It's a mere stroke of luck that the two religions have the same deity and connections.
To clarify my position.
I think the idea that Mithraism (or proto-Mithraism) developed in Commagene is rather plusible. What I doubt is it spreading to Italy in the 1st century BCE.

As a speculation about the spread of Mithraism among the Roman legions, one possibility might be the merging of the Commagene army with Roman forces from the beginning of the rule of Tiberius.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Case in point, despite the fact that christianity was supposed to have come into existence in the 1st c. CE, physical structures that have survived are from several centuries after that date. We note how Andrew Criddle has difficulty dating Mithraism in Rome back before the middle of the 1st c., because physical manifestations of the religion didn't appear until later in the century. I would have thought it reasonable that evidence for Mithraism in Rome could go back well over a century before its physical manifestations. You wouldn't think it was tendentious if he said, "events happening over a century before any evidence for such infiltration seem unlikely candidates."
IIUC you would agree that we have solid evidence of Christianity from the time of Trajan, (Pliny's letters) less than one hundred years after its origin. We have other evidence generally dated earlier. With Mithraism we have a gap of over 125 years from the events alleged by Plutarch to really anything else relevant.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 05-16-2007, 09:54 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post


A writer or informant who was from, or who had had contact with, one or more of the towns where the pirates had been resettled and met descendants or learnt that Mithraism there was due to the Cilician pirates who had been resettled there?
It is very possible that at the time of Plutarch writing (Trajan's reign) some of the places where the Pirates had been resettled, were claiming to be the place where Mithraism originated. Such claims are likely to be legendary.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 05-16-2007, 04:12 PM   #55
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
To clarify my position.
I think the idea that Mithraism (or proto-Mithraism) developed in Commagene is rather plusible. What I doubt is it spreading to Italy in the 1st century BCE.
I understand, yet I don't find your doubt based on anything tangible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
As a speculation about the spread of Mithraism among the Roman legions, one possibility might be the merging of the Commagene army with Roman forces from the beginning of the rule of Tiberius.
It's a fair speculation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
IIUC you would agree that we have solid evidence of Christianity from the time of Trajan, (Pliny's letters) less than one hundred years after its origin. We have other evidence generally dated earlier. With Mithraism we have a gap of over 125 years from the events alleged by Plutarch to really anything else relevant.
Literary evidence. As to archaeological evidence, Mithraism comes in much better than christianity. There was no literary tradition to maintain Mithraism, so your comparison doesn't seem particularly helpful.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 05-16-2007, 06:56 PM   #56
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Arguable - it may in fact be not that well buried, but it has metamorphosed consideraby over the centuries. Knights Templar, Freemasons, cricket, high catholicism come to mind.

It probably touches on male archetypes.
Cricket?
youngalexander is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:12 AM   #57
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youngalexander View Post
Cricket?
I was wondering if that would get a response!:devil1:

Many years ago the Observer had an article that Cricket was Christ's Wicca. I have not been able to find the article.

Cricket is an amazingly sophisticated ritualistic game and we probably in our western secular mind sets ignore the deep ritual and meaning and yes religious symbolism behind it.

I think there is something about our brains that loves this stuff - Mithras, Cricket and Freemasonry and High Catholicism may not be directly related but maybe predictable from how especially male brains work. There are more than enough similarities to classify them as a group like mammals.

And because there is a historic track maybe they are evolutionary outgrowths.

Andrew I am puzzled at what the problem is you have with Mithras or a romanised version spreading. It was an incredibly powerful ritual culminating in the initiate becoming one with the sun. The Roman centurians would have loved it and it would have spread like wild fire.


The legions went all over the place - we have the triumvirate leading all of this. We have the Cicillians as a major threat to Rome. We have plenty of evidence. What is the problem with joining up the dots here?

http://www.intute.ac.uk/artsandhuman...e.pl?id=202083

I would assume there are clear connections at least from Alexander and very likely Darius.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:14 AM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Andrew I am puzzled at what the problem is you have with Mithras or a romanised version spreading. It was an incredibly powerful ritual culminating in the iniatiate becoming one with the sun. The Roman centurians would have loved it and it would have spread like wild fire.

The legions went all over the place - we have the triumvirate leading all of this. We have the Cicillians as a major threat to Rome. We have plenty of evidence. What is the problem with joining up the dots here?
Lack of evidence.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:30 AM   #59
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
Lack of evidence.

All the best,

Roger Pearse

Please see edited post above - what is that if not evidence?

Quote:
Parthia.com
This website focuses on ancient Parthia and is aimed primarily at students. Parthian history is almost unknown until 53 BC, when the Parthians defeated the Roman legions that attempted the conquest of Persia. the struggle for power in Persia between Rome and Parthia continues until 224 AD, when the Sasanid Empire replaces Parthia, and continues thereafter. The Parthians were the only people who stopped the Roman expansion by repeatedly defeating Roman legions, though they also suffered several defeats themselves. There is copious historical and geographical information on the website with maps, chronological tables and some illustrations. In particular, all main historical events and locations are clearly outlined. A very interesting section focuses on Parthian coins, with tables of inscriptions and photographs. There are also some statistical analyses produced on the whole database. The author is also developing a special font, which can be downloaded along with other fonts designed for the study of ancient coins. References for all coins are provided. Photographs and details of coins sold at recent auctions are also available. This section has been authored by several people, some amateur and some academic archaeologists, and may interest researchers. There are also some pages with basic information about the art and culture of Parthia with hyperlinks to other resources. The website also includes a special section publishing the results of the ongoing archaeological excavations at Nisa. There is a search facility; an incomplete site map; a mailing list; a list of recent additions to the website; and an extensive bibliography.
http://www.parthia.com/
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 11:01 AM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post

Literary evidence. As to archaeological evidence, Mithraism comes in much better than christianity. There was no literary tradition to maintain Mithraism, so your comparison doesn't seem particularly helpful.


spin
Can we plausibly have fully developed Mithraism without archaeologically recognisable Mithraea ?

If we're talking about proto-Mithraism with the emphasis on proto then it would seem much more plausible.

It is quite plausible IMO that Pompey's resettlement of the pirates was an important factor in bringing some sort of knowledge of Mitra/Mithra to Italy, and that this knowledge was a necessary precondition of the later rise of full blown Mithraism.

What I find much less likely is that the Pirates were already practising some sort of cult of Mithras as slayer of the cosmic bull and that Pompey transported Mithraism in this sense to Italy.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:12 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.