FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2009, 02:42 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default A new History of Early Christianity

What can we learn from a new History of Early Christianity by Charles Freeman

A New History of Early Christianity (or via: amazon.co.uk)

Quote:
When reading the mainstream church histories, I often come across the argument that an event, say the physical resurrection of Christ, certainly happened because there is no other historical interpretation which makes sense. It worries me. Most events in the ancient world are poorly recorded and we simply have no grounds to make any historical interpretation at all! We just have to say we do not know what happened. So when theologians often say they are certain what happened, historians tend to be more cautious. In my New History of Early Christianity I discuss some historical evidence about the resurrection accounts that I think is overlooked though I conclude that, despite the lack of conclusive evidence for Jesus’ resurrection, the important thing was that early Christians believed that it happened.
Some strange speculation about Paul.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 02:54 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
What can we learn from a new History of Early Christianity by Charles Freeman

A New History of Early Christianity (or via: amazon.co.uk)

Quote:
When reading the mainstream church histories, I often come across the argument that an event, say the physical resurrection of Christ, certainly happened because there is no other historical interpretation which makes sense.
Is this claim documented? What, according to the author, are the "mainstream church histories" in which the claim noted here is "often" made? Where can it be found? And how often is "often"?


Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 03:04 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

You can, of course, address that specific question to Dr. Freeman. Someone posted something recently that indicated that NT Wrght makes this argument, and it has been picked up and circulated by American evangelicals, in particular William Lane Craig.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:01 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.