FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-05-2004, 08:44 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
How does Ex 21:22 say a fetus is not a human? The verse calls an unborn baby a child.
Actually, if you read the original, it doesn't. But you can't do that, can you? :down:

Toto - the law I was referring to is that if you injure a woman so that she has a miscarriage, then it is only a fine as determined by the judge and the husband. If the woman is further injured, than it is life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. Aka - the foetus is not a life.

Try to fuck 'em over on that one.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 06:45 AM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blt to go
Tsurmon - WARNING. Most christians presume that christ did away with ALL of the requirements of Mosaic Law, and therefore anything you use from Leviticus, Numbers, Exodus or Deut. will be dismissed both verbally and in their mind.
Quote:
NRSV:
Hebrews 8:6 But Jesus has now obtained a more excellent ministry, and to that degree he is the mediator of a better covenant, which has been enacted through better promises. 7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no need to look for a second one.
The writer of Hebrews clearly states that there would be no need for the law to be replaced if it had been "faultless." Well I took the opportunity to find passages in the Jewish Scriptures that refute this assertion. I wrote an essay on this subject but I want to revise it a bit before I post it. There are far too many passages to post them all, but here are several of them.

Quote:
Judaica Press:
Psalm 119:1. Praiseworthy are those whose way is perfect, who walk with the law of the Lord.
Quote:
Judaica Press:
Psalm 119:44 And I shall keep Your Torah constantly, forever and ever.
Quote:
Judaica Press:
Psalm 119:89. Forever, O Lord, Your word stands in the heavens.
Quote:
Judaica Press:
Psalm 119:142. Your righteousness is perpetual righteousness, and Your Torah is true.
Quote:
Judaica Press:
Psalm 119:151. You are near, O Lord, and all Your commandments are true. 152. From before, I knew from Your testimonies, for You established them to [the end of] the world.
Quote:
Judaica Press:
Psalm 119:160. The beginning of Your word is true, and each of Your righteous judgments is eternal.
I have yet to see a Christian tell me how something can be "more excellent" and "better" than that which is "perfect."
Non-believer is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 02:17 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Not even gonna go into this since you apparently haven't the foggiest clue what that verse means.

What verse are you referring to? Could you post the actual verses and not these stupid links to an even more stupid site?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 02:24 PM   #25
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
...
{Do not shelter, or wish well anyone not Christian. }
What verse are you referring to? Could you post the actual verses and not these stupid links to an even more stupid site?
This appears to be a reference to:

2 John

1:9
Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

1:10
If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:

1:11
For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 02:29 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anywhere but Colorado, including non-profits
Posts: 8,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cweb255
Actually, if you read the original, it doesn't. But you can't do that, can you? :down:

Toto - the law I was referring to is that if you injure a woman so that she has a miscarriage, then it is only a fine as determined by the judge and the husband. If the woman is further injured, than it is life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. Aka - the foetus is not a life.
22Â*Â*Â*If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
23Â*Â*Â*And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
24Â*Â*Â*Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25Â*Â*Â*Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
epepke is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 02:51 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

well, being King James and all, it's not the original, but it does back me up
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 06:16 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsurmon
As I said in another thread, I'll be debating gay marriage in a class on Tuesday. I asked my teacher about the format: Open forum, class divides into sides. this should put me and about 2-3 other people vs. the rest of the class.

Anyways, one of my key arguements will be that Christians can't just pick and choose the laws in the bible that they want enforced. It's either one or the other. To help with this, I'll need some really stupid laws and the verses of said laws.

So, mind helping a guy out?
There a plenty of seemingly stupid laws, but bear in mind that even St Paul did not consider that these laws were meant literally.

1 Corinthians 9:8-10
Do I say this merely from a human point of view? Doesn't the Law say the same thing? For it is written in the Law of Moses: "Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain." Is it about oxen that God is concerned? Surely he says this for us, doesn't he? Yes, this was written for us, because when the plowman plows and the thresher threshes, they ought to do so in the hope of sharing in the harvest.
judge is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 07:09 PM   #29
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Death Panel District 9
Posts: 20,921
Talking

I have to agree. If you are all for defending Leviticus, you might want to eat kosher.
Nice Squirrel is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 04:32 PM   #30
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Hey folks - Tsurman won his debate - go to the last page of that thread.

Please stick to Biblical issues in this thread. There are other threads on Gay Marriage in PD for those who want to debate other aspects of that topic.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.