FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-10-2011, 01:25 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
Default

Gday,

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Is that actually being done in the Heavenly Mount Zion or on the earthly Mount Zion? It seems to be a vision, but I can't see that it is being done in the heavens. (Not that it affects things one way or the other, just interested.)
It's not very clear really, is it?
But it sounds heavenly because :
* Mt Zion is mentioned (usually meaning the heavenly one in this period I think.)
* he asks an angel
* they have put off mortal clothing


Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
I have no problems with virtually anything happening in the upper heavens, as long as it represents God's dominion. I wouldn't think that Satan would be able to go up there and crucify Christ, for example.
Why not?
We see various references to Satan in the firmament or the Air - causing disobedience etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
The issue is this: I have no problem at all with any number of things happening in the "upper heavens". Thrones, crowns, cobble-stoned paths; all is good. As long as God's dominion is maintained, in charge and -- in Platonic terms -- pure and unchanging, then anything is fine.
It is only when we start to talk about death, suffering, evil, change, flesh, castration, crucifixion, etc, that we start hitting the issue of Doherty's mythical world.
Hmmm, OK - I'll look closer for more specific examples of that.

Still making progress with understanding each other :-)


K.
Kapyong is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 03:59 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Kapyong: What is your definition of Doherty's "Mythical World". How does it differ from "upper heavens"?
Well - it doesn't.
The Upper Heavens are part of that very Mythical World.
(I say 'part' to allow for other 'heavens' too, considering how different writers place things differently.)

Is this point our stumbling block, G.Don ?

Do you disagree with the Upper Heavens being a Mythical World where Gods can Act for the benefit of their believers below ?
Well, that goes back to my question: what is your definition of Doherty's "Mythical World"?

I suspect you see it as "any place in the heavens where the gods act". Since these are (to our eyes) myths, they are therefore part of a 'mythical world'.

But that isn't Doherty's "World of Myth". A myth is a story that comes to a dramatic conclusion, the conclusion having significance to the believer. Think of the examples given by Doherty: Attis is castrated (which has significance in the mysteries); Mithras sheds the eternal blood of the bull (bringing renewed life to earth); Christ is crucified (leading to salvation). These are all conceptually the same: stories that are assumed to be true in some way.

The question is, where were these myths thought to have been carried out? According to Doherty, the myths were thought to have been carried out in an upper world, which is his "World of Myth". As far as I can see, these myths were thought to have occurred on earth (and let me repeat for the umpteenth time for the benefit of those who keep getting me wrong on this: that Paul saw Jesus as being crucified on earth doesn't automatically mean 'Jesus was real!')

For an example of something that is NOT a myth (in the sense above): The Last Judgement, where everyone is standing before the throne of God, waiting to be judged. True, it takes place in Heaven, but where else is God going to do things? But it doesn't therefore form part of a 'mythical world', in the sense of a 'World of Myth'.

So keep in mind that, when talking about "myth", it isn't "myth" as we see it today. Think of it as tales that they told about their gods -- eating, sleeping, drinking, fighting -- which occurred somewhere where the gods could eat, sleep, drink and fight.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
P.S.
It looks like I confused my Esdras - I quoted 1st C. 4 Ezra, but I think that is really from 2bd - 3rd C. 5 Ezra (start of 2 Esdras.)
If you can provide cites or even on-line links for your sources, that would be good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Is that actually being done in the Heavenly Mount Zion or on the earthly Mount Zion? It seems to be a vision, but I can't see that it is being done in the heavens. (Not that it affects things one way or the other, just interested.)
It's not very clear really, is it?
But it sounds heavenly because :
* Mt Zion is mentioned (usually meaning the heavenly one in this period I think.)
* he asks an angel
* they have put off mortal clothing
Hmmm... at the end of time, God is going to roll up the firmament like a scroll, descend and make a new heaven and new earth. So it might be part of the new earth. Anyway, not really important one way or the other. For reasons I gave above, even if it is in heaven, it isn't part of the "World of Myth".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
I have no problems with virtually anything happening in the upper heavens, as long as it represents God's dominion. I wouldn't think that Satan would be able to go up there and crucify Christ, for example.
Why not?
We see various references to Satan in the firmament or the Air - causing disobedience etc.
True, but these aren't the upper heavens. If what I understand is correct, then Satan can no more go into the upper heavens and carry out his evil deeds, than the Holy Jerusalem can be located in the lower heavens. It has to do with the nature of the upper and lower heavens.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
The issue is this: I have no problem at all with any number of things happening in the "upper heavens". Thrones, crowns, cobble-stoned paths; all is good. As long as God's dominion is maintained, in charge and -- in Platonic terms -- pure and unchanging, then anything is fine.
It is only when we start to talk about death, suffering, evil, change, flesh, castration, crucifixion, etc, that we start hitting the issue of Doherty's mythical world.
Hmmm, OK - I'll look closer for more specific examples of that.

Still making progress with understanding each other :-)
Sure, no problem with that at all! I feel confident I understand the concepts behind Doherty's WoM and also behind how they REALLY thought but I'll admit to my layman status and happily say I may be wrong on both. Doing this is very useful for me as well.

By the way, my review of Doherty's book is now up, so no worries referring to that if you like. Also, I removed the section on 'Platonic Counterparts', not because it was wrong -- I still see trying to fit a "World of Myth" into the lower heavens as a Platonic counterpart being a huge stumbling block for Doherty's theory -- but because it deserves a lot more focus than I gave it. I may revisit it in the future, though I plan to turn to other things, so probably won't.
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 06:06 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
It looks like I confused my Esdras - I quoted 1st C. 4 Ezra, but I think that is really from 2bd - 3rd C. 5 Ezra (start of 2 Esdras.)
Kevin Edgecomb (even though he thinks I am an unsavable liberal with no sense of reverence whatsoever) reproduced a table of the names given to Ezra books from the 2nd edition of The Oxford Annotated Bible: Apocrypha (the table is not in 3rd edition or expanded editions of the Annotated Bible), here.

The Ezra books (which go far beyond the Ezra that preceeds Nehemiah in English bibles) go by a tremendous number of names.

DCH
DCHindley is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 01:48 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

I see the following source as supporting Doherty's World of Myth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius writing the Life of the THRICE BLESSED Lord God Caesar Constantine

CHAPTER L:
That the Persecution originated an Account of the Oracle of Apollo,
who, it was said, could not give Oracles because of "the Righteous Men."


"About that time it is said that Apollo spoke from a deep and gloomy cavern, and through the medium of no human voice, and declared that the righteous men on earth were a bar to his speaking the truth, and accordingly that the oracles from the tripod were fallacious. Hence it was that he suffered his tresses to droop in token of grief, (1) and mourned the evils which the loss of the oracular spirit would entail on mankind. But let us mark the consequences of this.
CHAPTER LI:
That Constantine, when a Youth, heard from him who wrote the Persecution Edict
that "the Righteous Men" were the Christians.


"I call now on thee, most high God, to witness that, when young, I heard him who at that time was chief among the Roman emperors, unhappy, truly unhappy as he was, and laboring under mental delusion, make earnest enquiry of his attendants as to who these righteous ones on earth were, and that one of the Pagan priests then present replied that they were doubtless the Christians.

This answer he eagerly received, like some honeyed draught, and unsheathed the sword which was ordained for the punishment of crime, against those whose holiness was beyond reproach. Immediately, therefore, he issued those sanguinary edicts, traced, if I may so express myself, with a sword's point dipped in blood; at the same time commanding his judges to tax their ingenuity for the invention of new and more terrible punishments.

This source discloses the battle between the Christians and the Powers of Apollo at the time in the late 3rd and early 4th centuries, which precipitated the alleged great persecution, happened in a strange and MYTHICAL realm.



Whereabouts would this battle have taken place Kapyong?
Precisely where did the 3rd/4th century Christian (Jedi master)
practitioners silence Apollo's oracles?

I dont think this realm was either real or historical, but rather ---- in the words of Arnaldo Momigliano, "reflect the inevitable vagaries of Eusebius’ mind to whom chronology was something between an exact science and an instrument of propaganda.".

I dont know if Earl has read Momigliano, but its appears that Eusebius was not slow in admitting that it was in a mythical realm, that a preliminary and very real battle was won by Christians against the powers of Apollo.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 01:40 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
Default

Gday,

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
Kevin Edgecomb (even though he thinks I am an unsavable liberal with no sense of reverence whatsoever) reproduced a table of the names given to Ezra books from the 2nd edition of The Oxford Annotated Bible: Apocrypha (the table is not in 3rd edition or expanded editions of the Annotated Bible), here.

The Ezra books (which go far beyond the Ezra that preceeds Nehemiah in English bibles) go by a tremendous number of names.
DCH
Thanks.

I've got it sorted I think - my collection now includes :
Ezra
4 Ezra
5 Ezra
6 Ezra
Greek Apocalypse of Ezra
Revelation of Ezra
Questions of Ezra
Vision of the Blessed Ezra


K.
Kapyong is offline  
Old 02-22-2011, 05:59 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default Support for the "World of Myth" in the Gnostic Nag Hammadi Codices?

Evidence of the "World of Myth" at NHC?

I am taking the liberty of responding to Toto's information in another thread

The NHC material seems to substantiate Earl Doherty's claims in some manner, and especially interesting is the discussion by the author of the following book at Page 218 (Google Books), located by Toto.

Thanks very much again Toto for your invaluable resourcefullness.

Best wishes,


Pete


Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

The great apostle is Paul. The Hypostasis of the Archons is dated to the third century, which is a bit later than Paul is usually dated.

Read more at p. 217 Introduction to the New Testament, Volume 2 (or via: amazon.co.uk) By Helmut Köster, also on google books
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.