FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-20-2011, 06:12 AM   #91
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post

Christianity may have started, just as well, with a revelation. So now you know two possible explanations...

Would you like more?
yes
Christianity may have started by people mistaking some allegory as something that actually happened in the past.

More?
dog-on is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 06:22 AM   #92
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

No,I don’t want more of nothing.
Iskander is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 06:29 AM   #93
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
No,I don’t want more of nothing.
Well then, I suppose you can easily refute them, so...go for it!
dog-on is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 06:37 AM   #94
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post

Not at all.

In the very NT, Christianity started with the Holy Ghost. See Acts 2
That Christianity started with the man Jesus is an explanation for the existence of Christianity. I know of no other explanation. Paul and the rest of it all is part of the Christian explanation.

People who say Jesus did not exist as a man have nothing to offer as an explanation. The deniers prefer to bully the reasonable people that object to their backseat criticisms.
.
"That Christianity started with the man Jesus is an explanation for the existence of Christianity."
Yes, this an 'explanation' expresses that common (and Christian desired) assumption as to the origins of 'Christianity'.
That does not make it a valid assumption.

That you 'know of no other explanation', reflects only that common general lack of knowledge of actual Hebrew/Jewish views and explanations on the content, themes, and hopes expressed within the ancient Hebrew/Jewish texts, and how they were co-opted, corrupted, and misrepresented in ongoing power struggles between various competing factions.

You say;
Quote:
People who say Jesus did not exist as a man have nothing to offer as an explanation.
Whether you are aware of it or not, this is an absolutely false statement.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 06:38 AM   #95
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

Refute what?


There exists an explanation for the existence of Christianity and this explanation exists whether or not one is a Christian.


The explanation has nothing to do with being a Christian. It is the same explanation for everyone.
Iskander is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 06:40 AM   #96
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post

That Christianity started with the man Jesus is an explanation for the existence of Christianity. I know of no other explanation. Paul and the rest of it all is part of the Christian explanation.

People who say Jesus did not exist as a man have nothing to offer as an explanation. The deniers prefer to bully the reasonable people that object to their backseat criticisms.
.
"That Christianity started with the man Jesus is an explanation for the existence of Christianity."
Yes, this an 'explanation' expresses that common (and Christian desired) assumption as to the origins of 'Christianity'.
That does not make it a valid assumption.

That you 'know of no other explanation', reflects only that common general lack of knowledge of actual Hebrew/Jewish views and explanations on the content, themes, and hopes expressed within the ancient Hebrew/Jewish texts, and how they were co-opted, corrupted, and misrepresented in ongoing power struggles between various competing factions.

You say;
Quote:
People who say Jesus did not exist as a man have nothing to offer as an explanation.
Whether you are aware of it or not, this is an absolutely false statement.
See #95
Iskander is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 07:19 AM   #97
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
Refute what?


There exists an explanation for the existence of Christianity and this explanation exists whether or not one is a Christian.


The explanation has nothing to do with being a Christian. It is the same explanation for everyone.
I am not sure how your answer has anything to do with my question...
dog-on is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 07:26 AM   #98
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archibald View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

The interesting question is how religions get started.
That is indeed a very good question. Very good, IMO. How do religions normally get started?
Shamanism - person receives "message" from hallucination, teaches it to his or her tribe.

Islam - person receives a "message" from a hallucination, preaches it to local folks.

Judaism - a sequence of people receive "messages" from hallucinations, preach them to their people.

Greek religion - people receive "answers" from hallucinations to give to querents.

Hinduism - many, many yoga and jnana texts are "recieved" from various gods, as per their dedications, Siva being a particular favourite.

seiðr ("Sith" ) - pre-Christian Norse religion - people "take the high seat" and receive "answers" from hallucinations to give to querents.

Celestial Masters Daoism - person receives "message" from hallucination and founds religion. Later, another person receives "message" from hallucination that founds another massive regional branch of the same religion.

Tibetan Buddhism - everybody and his mother gets "messages" from various hallucinations and propounds variations on the main themes of the religion.

(?) Christianity - person gets "message" from hallucination and founds religion. Was that person a human "Joshua" hallucinating God his Father, or a human "Paul" hallucinating "Christ, Son of God"? Too difficult to say for sure, evidence highly ambiguous, but latter more likely.

None of these hallucinations are necessarily pathological (though some may be) - they are the result of normal functions of the brain, gerrymandered to somewhat uncommon (though as can be seen from above, not all that uncommon) results under certain circumstances (spiritual exercises including breathing practices, tremendous life crises, sleep deprivation, intense concentration on texts, ritual magic exercises, drugs, dancing, etc., etc.)
gurugeorge is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 07:35 AM   #99
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gurugeorge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by archibald View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

The interesting question is how religions get started.
That is indeed a very good question. Very good, IMO. How do religions normally get started?
Shamanism - person receives "message" from hallucination, teaches it to his or her tribe.

Islam - person receives a "message" from a hallucination, preaches it to local folks.

Judaism - a sequence of people receive "messages" from hallucinations, preach them to their people.

Greek religion - people receive "answers" from hallucinations to give to querents.

Hinduism - many, many yoga and jnana texts are "recieved" from various gods, as per their dedications, Siva being a particular favourite.

seiðr ("Sith" ) - pre-Christian Norse religion - people "take the high seat" and receive "answers" from hallucinations to give to querents.

Celestial Masters Daoism - person receives "message" from hallucination and founds religion. Later, another person receives "message" from hallucination that founds another massive regional branch of the same religion.

Tibetan Buddhism - everybody and his mother gets "messages" from various hallucinations and propounds variations on the main themes of the religion.

(?) Christianity - person gets "message" from hallucination and founds religion. Was that person a human "Joshua" hallucinating God his Father, or a human "Paul" hallucinating "Christ, Son of God"? Too difficult to say for sure, evidence highly ambiguous, but latter more likely.

None of these hallucinations are necessarily pathological (though some may be) - they are the result of normal functions of the brain, gerrymandered to somewhat uncommon (though as can be seen from above, not all that uncommon) results under certain circumstances (spiritual exercises including breathing practices, tremendous life crises, sleep deprivation, intense concentration on texts, ritual magic exercises, drugs, dancing, etc., etc.)
Hi George,

Now, I'm afraid you do, don't you, know what I have to ask you next? :]

How many of those are purported to be visions of persons who walked the earth, and not just that, but apparently quite recently?

I can spot one, at the end. Not sure if there are any others. :]

And before you reply by saying whatever you are about to say about Paul, I must warn you that I am going to ask you for evidence and/or method.
archibald is offline  
Old 09-20-2011, 07:48 AM   #100
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archibald View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

We don't because we have other evidence of their historicity.
Yes, we often do, for more major characters. For many many minor characters we don't.
And where we don't, historians do not generally insist that these characters must be historical.

Quote:
In any case, the general point is that it is not unusual for actual persons to have myths and/or exaggerations added to their story.

So, when you say the MJ scenario is 'simple' because it is well known that people just invent characters, that is not saying very much, because it is also well known that people have confabulations added to them.
But in the MJ case, you don't have to invent the hypothetical historical person, for whom we have no independent evidence.

Quote:
In any case, you are not actually describing the MJ scenario, which involves both a non-existent person (NEP) in the first place and a switch (apparently not long after in historical terms) to an EP, with as far as I know, no clear evidence of any switch having been made.
The clear evidence is the gospels.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:20 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.