FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2010, 11:01 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default Annotated Justinian Code online

Annotated Justinian Code By Fred H. Blume, Edited by Timothy Kearley (Second Edition)

I ran across this which might be of interest.
Toto is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 03:36 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
Default

William Rosen, a historian of Justinian times, writes of this code that it contained, in effect by royal decree, fictional precedents to 'justify' the legal revisions. A classic case of ancient forgery and manufacturing of narratives for political (in this case legal) purposes. (Ancient Forgeries -- by lawful decree)
neilgodfrey is offline  
Old 03-13-2010, 10:01 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Annotated Justinian Code By Fred H. Blume, Edited by Timothy Kearley (Second Edition)

I ran across this which might be of interest.
Quite an amazing story how Blume made this translation.
mountainman is offline  
Old 03-13-2010, 10:14 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neilgodfrey View Post
William Rosen, a historian of Justinian times, writes of this code that it contained, in effect by royal decree, fictional precedents to 'justify' the legal revisions. A classic case of ancient forgery and manufacturing of narratives for political (in this case legal) purposes. (Ancient Forgeries -- by lawful decree)
An extremely interesting article. Imperial forgery was the go in these centuries -- those in control cemented their control by altering the decisions of those before them. Of course they were all Christians - very steadfast continuators of Eusebius (to quote a term used by Momigliano).

Quote:
“The commissioners were forced to either cite anonymous precedents, or to put words in the mouths of predecessors that were not previously there. Thus, perversely, the respect that the commission gave to historical precedent trumped their respect — if, indeed, they had such — for scholarly honesty. . . .

“. . . . the Digest needed not to compile, but to legitimate, the laws. When they did not agree, they were made to agree.” (p.128)
This very same regime also preserved the "History of Christian Origins". It should make even the least skeptical of people understand that these people in control did exactly what they pleased with integrity.

Quite an appropriate "Other Related Posts" ...... •Prosperity comes from God
Ha ha ha ha ha ------- God helps the Emperor Who Helps Himself is more like it

When is someone going to reserve the same treatment for the Theodosian Codex, and the
UTTERLY DRACONIAN "CHRISTIAN" LAWS ENACTED UNDER THE RULE OF BULLNECK ?
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.