FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2007, 02:53 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark View Post
I thought I had. King Solomon mentions other gods in 2 Chronicles. See the quote in my earlier post. YHWH refers to other gods -- frequently. If they didn't believe in other gods, why did they keep referring to them? Over and over again, it is stated: 'I AM YHWH, your God', not 'I am God', as a monotheistic culture would. Why is this not evidence of polytheism????
Because you lack context to your interpretation? You assume that Yahweh is everyone's God. That isn't so. The scriptures are pretty clear that Israel is the chosen land, the Hebrews are the chosen people. So when Yahweh says that he is their God, he isn't saying that other cultures have their own gods, but that other cultures have false gods. The prophets showed that the "gods" of the Philistines and other cultures were false gods. Their gods couldn't do anything. Baal couldn't light a fire. But Elijah had the alter soaked, and called upon Yahweh to light the alter, and it burst aflame.

Why is it for you more likely that the author of Chronicles (one of the last books to be canonized, written much, much later than the Torah, and generally thought to be within the period historically where the Judaeans were clearly a majority monotheistic) was henotheistic or polytheistic rather than showing that belief in other gods is foolish, because they don't have any power...because they don't exist?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 05:26 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post

Because you lack context to your interpretation? You assume that Yahweh is everyone's God.
No I don't. YHWH was a tribal god of the Hebrews only (although there is one passage in the Torah that implies he MAY have been the god of others. I admit there is evidence on both sides).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
That isn't so. The scriptures are pretty clear that Israel is the chosen land, the Hebrews are the chosen people.
Agreed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
So when Yahweh says that he is their God, he isn't saying that other cultures have their own gods, but that other cultures have false gods.
Does He use a term like "false gods" anywhere? Or does He say "gods you haven't known?" as in the following passage (in which He makes a prediction about what will be said about the Hebrews if they don't keep His commands) "And they went and served other gods and bowed to them, gods whom they hadn't known and He hadn't allocated to them." Deut. 29:25

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
The prophets showed that the "gods" of the Philistines and other cultures were false gods. Their gods couldn't do anything. Baal couldn't light a fire. But Elijah had the alter soaked, and called upon Yahweh to light the alter, and it burst aflame.
When did the prophets make these claims? I admitted that the Hebrews became monotheistic, but not in the Torah.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
Why is it for you more likely that the author of Chronicles (one of the last books to be canonized, written much, much later than the Torah, and generally thought to be within the period historically where the Judaeans were clearly a majority monotheistic)
Please provide support for this passage. I'm not arguing against it, I just want the citation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
was henotheistic or polytheistic rather than showing that belief in other gods is foolish, because they don't have any power...because they don't exist?
Again, because he has Solomon proclaim that "our God is greater than all other gods", instead of the far more rational "our God is great" or "our God is the only one". If other gods are false, why even mention them? If the Israelites were at that time monotheistic, that statement would be totally nonsensical to his people. The comparison is meaningless.
Joan of Bark is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 06:53 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

It is pretty obvious that the author of Exodus believed in the existence of the Egyptian gods. There is a "contest of powers" between YHWH and the Egyptian deities, in which the Egyptian priests reproduce the "sticks to snakes" miracle and several of the Plagues!

Apologists sometimes try to argue that the Egyptian priests were "sorcerers" (somehow able to work miracles without divine assistance), or that the actual magic was provided by "demons". But YHWH attacks the Egyptian deities personally in Exodus 12:12 and Numbers 33:4 (while offering a reprieve to rival deities in 1 Samuel 6:5).
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 03:14 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
Default

Hey, those are great passages, Jack. I don't know how I missed them.
Joan of Bark is offline  
Old 06-22-2007, 03:25 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayrok View Post
Jeremiah 32:29 -- The Babylonians who are attacking this city will come in and set it on fire; they will burn it down, along with the houses where the people provoked me to anger by burning incense on the roofs to Baal and by pouring out drink offerings to other gods.

Ezekiel 8:13-14 -- Again, he said, "You will see them doing things that are even more detestable." 14 Then he brought me to the entrance to the north gate of the house of the LORD, and I saw women sitting there, mourning for Tammuz.


Why would Yahweh, the supposed only true God, name other gods by name and be so upset that his people are praying to them if they didn't exist? Why wouldn't he just prove to his people that Baal, Tammuz and the other gods didn't exist?

Instead, he includes as part of his written laws that his people will worship no other gods before him. He isn't talking about money or fame... He's talking about Baal, Tammuz, Zeus, et el.

Does he really believe there are other gods out there?

Of course in reality, it is the authors of the OT that pen this and it is their view that God may believe in them. Yet to the Christian the Bible is divinely inspired.
Because Yahweh was a dessert god just like the gods mentioned; in other words; a man made god, just like the rest of them.
angelo is offline  
Old 06-22-2007, 03:55 AM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
It is pretty obvious that the author of Exodus believed in the existence of the Egyptian gods. There is a "contest of powers" between YHWH and the Egyptian deities, in which the Egyptian priests reproduce the "sticks to snakes" miracle and several of the Plagues!

Apologists sometimes try to argue that the Egyptian priests were "sorcerers" (somehow able to work miracles without divine assistance), or that the actual magic was provided by "demons". But YHWH attacks the Egyptian deities personally in Exodus 12:12 and Numbers 33:4 (while offering a reprieve to rival deities in 1 Samuel 6:5).
Exodus never happened. There is not a shred of evidence from archeology, or for that matter from Egyptian records of any exodus of Hebrews. In fact the existence of Moses is today in strong doubt. There may have been a small group of people to leave Egypt, with no concern to the Egyptians whatsoever. Not the big deal the Jews made of the whole affair.
angelo is offline  
Old 06-22-2007, 08:40 AM   #47
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

I would love to see a clear explanation of what monotheism actually is. I do see people claiming to worship one god, but please show me anyone anywhere who did not and does not believe in other gods angels cherubim demons djinn saints etc etc. (lesser gods).

I also see from the possibly sixteenth century onwards (does it go back to Plato or Zarathustra?) a deist concept of a starter motor god, but did Judaism or Xianity or Islam ever use those ideas?

These ideas probably have been mixed and matched over the centuries and I see now the huge majority of the planet being various forms of polytheists - despite the claims of Judaism, Xianity and Islam - a few deist god believers with a scientific background and growing numbers of materialists.

The vast majority are pagan, a significant number are imperialist pagans with an all powerful god, but they all have a huge panoply of gods and supernatural hangers on.

(Is the Trinity a heavenly triumvirate?)
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 06-23-2007, 02:58 PM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Now that I have more time, I would like to show, with appeal to scholarly sources and the biblical text, that Israel was not always monotheistic (as expressed in passages like Isaiah 44:6, Deuteronomy 32:39, and Isaiah 45:5), and previously took for granted the existence of other gods.

Deuteronomy 32:8-9 reads in the NRSV:

Quote:
8 When the Most High apportioned the nations, when he divided humankind, he fixed the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the gods; 9 Yahweh's own portion was his people, Jacob his allotted share.
We know from the Ugaritic (Ras Shamra) tablets that the Canaanite god El fathered 70 gods; this background informs about Deuteronomy 32:8-9. Mark S. Smith writes on page 49 of The Origins of Biblical Monotheism, my emphasis:

Quote:
...the texts of the Septuagint and the Dead Sea Scrolls show an Israelite polytheism that clearly focuses on the central importance of Yahweh for Israel within the larger scheme of the world, yet this larger scheme provides a place for all the other gods in the world. Moreover, even if this text is quite mute about the god who presides over the whole arrangement, it does maintain a place for such a god who is not Yahweh. The title Elyon ("Most High") seems to denote the figure of El (called El Elyon in Genesis 14:18-22); he is par excellence not only at Ugarit but also in Psalm 82. The author of Psalm 82 wishes to depose this older theology, as the Israelite God is called to assume a new role as judge of all the world. Yet at the same time, Psalm 82, like Deuteronomy 32:8-9, preserves the outlines of the older Israelite theology it is rejecting.
Here is Smith's comment on Psalm 82, pp 155-156 of the same book, again my emphasis:

Quote:
...the form of older Israelite (reduced) polytheism known from Psalm 82 casts Yahweh in an explicit divine council scene not as its head, who is instead left decidedly mute or left undescribed (which is probably the reason it survived the later collapsing of the different tiers). Psalm 82 begins:

God (elohim) stands in the assembly of El/divine council (adat el), Among
the divinities (elohim) He pronounces judgment.

Here the figure God takes his stand in the assembly. The name God was understood in the tradition, and perhaps at the time of the text's original composition as well, to be none other than Yahweh; the name El seems to be involved with the expression "assembly of El" (preferable to "divine assembly," given El's title, Elyon, in verse 6). In any case, the assembly consists of all the gods of the world, for all those other gods are condemned to death in verse 6:

I myself presumed that You are gods, Sons of the Most High (Elyon), Yet like humans you will die, And fall like any prince.

A prophetic voice emerges in verse 8, calling for God (elohim) to assume the role of judge of all the earth:

Arise, O God, judge the world; For you inherit all the nations.

Here Yahweh in effect assumes the task of all gods to rule their own nations. Verse 6 calls the gods "sons of Elyon," probably a title of El at an early point in biblical tradition (Genesis 14:18-20)...Psalm 82 preserves a tradition that casts the god of Israel not in the role of the presiding god of the pantheon but as one of his sons. Each of these sons has a different nation as his ancient patrimony (or family inheritance) and therefore serves as its ruler. Then verse 6 calls on Yahweh to arrogate to himself the traditional inheritance of all the other gods: all the nations.
Richard Elliott Friedman, in Commentary on the Torah, page 667-668, paperback edition, concurs. He writes regarding Deuteronomy 32:8:

Quote:
...the Greek text reads "to the number of the angels of God." And there are cases in which bene elohim are thought to be the angels (Gen 6:2; Job 1:6). It is likely that the Greek translator had the "children of the gods" and changed it to "angels of God" to establish that these were in fact the angels and not the pagan gods. On this understanding of the bene elohim, God allots an angels to each of the nations but retains Israel for himself.

I believe that Psalm 82 is particularly relevant to this matter...And note that it refers to God as "the Highest" (elyon), as in our verse here in the Song of Moses (and it refers to the gods as the children of the Highest); and it ends with God giving legacies to the nations (82:8)--which is also what our verse here says: "When the Highest gave nations legacies..." It is likely, therefore, that the passage in the Song of Moses reflects the idea of Psalm 82: that there were once lesser gods along with YHWH, and that each was the god of a people, but they were inadequate, and they no longer exist.
John Day, in The Anchor Bible Dictionary entry "Canaan, Religion of," Volume 1, page 835, my emphasis:

Quote:
In his identification with El, Yahweh also appropriated the "sons of El," so that "the sons of God" formed his heavenly court (cf. Job 1:6; 2:1). The notion that they were seventy in number lived on, since Deut 32:8 states that "the Most High...fixed the bounds of the people according to the number of the sons of God (so LXX; 4QDeut), from which evolved in Jewish apocalyptic literature the notion of seventy guardian angels of the nations. Thus, as absolute monotheism took over from monolatry in Israel, those who had originally been in the pantheon of the gods were demoted to the status of angels.
This new understanding, that angels, rather than gods rule the nations, finds expression in Sirach 17:17 and Daniel 10:

Quote:
Daniel 10:13, 20-21
13 But the prince of the kingdom of Persia opposed me twenty-one days. So Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, and I left him there with the prince of the kingdom of Persia...20 Then he said, "Do you know why I have come to you? Now I must return to fight against the prince of Persia, and when I am through with him, the prince of Greece will come. 21 But I am to tell you what is inscribed in the book of truth. There is no one with me who contends against these princes except Michael, your prince.
Quote:
Sirach 17:17:
17 He appointed a ruler for every nation, but Israel is the Lord's own portion.
The belief that country had a corresponding god is found in several places in the OT.

Quote:
Judges 11:23-24:
{Jephthah speaking to the king of the Ammonites}: 23 So now Yahweh, the God of Israel, has conquered the Amorites for the benefit of his people Israel. Do you intend to take their place? 24 Should you not possess what your god Chemosh gives you to possess? And should we not be the ones to possess everything that Yahweh our God has conquered for our benefit?
The text is somewhat confused, because Chemosh was actually the god of the Moabites, and Milcom was the god of the Ammonites (see 1 Kings 11:5, 33), but the point remains, and the belief that what transpired with the gods in heaven impacted earthly events was also believed by other ANE inhabitants, including the Moabites, as evidenced by the Moabite Stone, my emphasis:

Quote:
And I made this high place for Kemosh in Qarhar . . . because of the deliverance of Mesha, and because he has saved me from all the kings and because he caused me to see [my desire] upon all who hated me. Omri, king of Israel -- he oppressed Moab many days, because Chemosh was angry with his land.
Compare the language used by Jeremiah in his oracle against Moab:

Jeremiah 48:1a, 7:

Quote:
Concerning Moab.
Thus says Yahweh of hosts, the God of Israel...7 Surely, because you trusted in your strongholds and your treasures, you also shall be taken; Chemosh shall go out into exile, with his priests and his attendants.
Here is the oracle against Ammon, from Jeremiah 49:1:

Quote:
Concerning the Ammonites. Thus says Yahweh: Has Israel no sons? Has he no heir? Why then has Milcom dispossessed Gad, and his people settled in its towns?
The prophet Micah's vision of the future allowed for each nation to retain its non-Israelite identity and worship:

Quote:
Micah 4:1-5:
In days to come the mountain of Yahweh's house shall be established as the highest of the mountains, and shall be raised up above the hills. Peoples shall stream to it, 2 and many nations shall come and say: "Come, let us go up to the mountain of Yahweh, to the house of the God of Jacob; that he may teach us his ways and that we may walk in his paths." For out of Zion shall go forth instruction, and the word of Yahweh from Jerusalem. 3 He shall judge between many peoples, and shall arbitrate between strong nations far away; they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more; 4 but they shall all sit under their own vines and under their own fig trees, and no one shall make them afraid; for the mouth of Yahweh of hosts has spoken. 5 For all the peoples walk, each in the name of its god, but we will walk in the name of Yahweh our God forever and ever.
I hope that this post has proven useful.
John Kesler is offline  
Old 07-09-2007, 02:15 AM   #49
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayrok View Post
Does he really believe there are other gods out there?
Evidently along with God, other gods do exist.


Quote:
Originally Posted by anders View Post
He's a jealous god (Exodus 20:4-5).
That must mean that there is at least one more and more powerful god. What else could he be jealous of?
God wants us to live, charitably happy in His sense. In so doing, we actually praise... Him - kinda a *win-win* deal. so a good thing to jealously want to continue... eh?

Annie
Well is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:58 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.