FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-02-2013, 02:31 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default Are the reactions to mythicists because they are seen as gnostic heretics?

Quote:
Gnosticism
Duration: 43 minutes
First broadcast: Thursday 02 May 2013
Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss Gnosticism, a sect associated with early Christianity. The Gnostics divided the universe into two domains: the visible world and the spiritual one. They believed that a special sort of knowledge, or gnosis, would enable them to escape the evils of the physical world and allow them access to the higher spiritual realm. The Gnostics were regarded as heretics by many of the Church Fathers, but their influence was important in defining the course of early Christianity. A major archaeological discovery in Egypt in the 1940s, when a large cache of Gnostic texts were found buried in an earthenware jar, enabled scholars to learn considerably more about their beliefs.

With:

Martin Palmer
Director of the International Consultancy on Religion, Education, and Culture

Caroline Humfress
Reader in History at Birkbeck College, University of London

Alastair Logan
Honorary University Fellow of the Department of Theology and Religion at the University of Exeter

Producer: Thomas Morris
This was very thought provoking

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01s4rhz
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 07:04 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Good question.

I will listen to this over the weekend.

Thanks.







εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia
mountainman is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 01:53 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

I don't see much of a connection. What do you take to be the connection between the ancient gnostics and the perceptions of modern mythicists?
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 01:56 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The ancient gnostics believed in a more spiritual Christ and thought of "flesh" as corrupt.

Freke and Gandy are essentially modern neo-gnostics.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 02:02 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

I know mythicists have drawn connections between themselves and the ancient gnostics. I don't think this connection registers in the minds of the critics. The critics tend to think mythicists are just secularists opposed to the Christian religion, which really does seem to describe a good number of them.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 02:28 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

It depends on the mythicist, and on the critic.

As I keep trying to explain, there are mythicists who are pro-religion. Robert M.Price loves the Episcopal Church. Acharya S thinks highly of nature based religions.

And there are mythicists who think that a historical Jesus could be a better argument against Christianity, such as Richard Carrier.

Your attempts to link mythicism to anti-Christian sentiment rather than an evaluation of the evidence have been a continual failure.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 02:52 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Is there a typo above?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 04:05 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
It depends on the mythicist, and on the critic.

As I keep trying to explain, there are mythicists who are pro-religion. Robert M.Price loves the Episcopal Church. Acharya S thinks highly of nature based religions.

And there are mythicists who think that a historical Jesus could be a better argument against Christianity, such as Richard Carrier.

Your attempts to link mythicism to anti-Christian sentiment rather than an evaluation of the evidence have been a continual failure.
Well, what I think or what mythicists think is not as relevant as the perceptions of the critics. In the minds of the critics, the belief that Jesus was myth is most closely associated with anti-religious secularism, not with gnosticism. Do you blame them? Jesus mythicism has been a component in the anti-religious media, including docugandas such as Zeitgeist, The God Who Wasn't There, even Bill Maher's Religulous. Two of the leading proponents of Jesus Mythicism have made their careers as leaders in anti-religious secularism (Frank Zindler and Richard Carrier). Suppose you think this is wrong and the perception is unjustified--well, it is a popular perception all the same, which is my only relevant point. There is no obvious connection between mythicism and gnosticism, especially not in the minds of the critics.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 04:06 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Is there a typo above?
Toto was referring to me, not to you, if that is what you are concerned about.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 04:27 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

By the way, my "continual failure" is expressed in this thread:

Relationship between opposition to Christianity and advocacy of mythical-Jesus theory
ApostateAbe is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.