FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-02-2009, 11:03 PM   #21
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Sulpitius Severus claimed Jesus was born on the 25th December in Sacred History 2.27.
Quote:

.....For as now the advent of Christ was at hand, it was necessary, according to the predictions of the prophets, that they should be deprived of their own rulers, that they might not look for anything beyond Christ. Under this Herod, in the thirty-third year of his reign, Christ was born on the twenty-fifth of December in the consulship of Sabinus and Rufinus...
See http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/35052.htm
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 11:58 PM   #22
avi
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
Sulpitius Severus claimed Jesus was born on the 25th December in Sacred History 2.27.
Fifth Century
avi is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 12:28 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Failte View Post
Seems like a lot of mental gymnastics to "make" it work out ("must have been conceived on the same date..." Um, why?) for something that has a perfectly reasonable explanation already.
The theory with the most evidence wins, and there seems to be no evidence to connect Christmas with Sol Invictus, except maybe the shared date? Since Christians at the time made the pagan religions the enemy and tried to make Christianity distinct, it is unlikely that they borrowed the pagan holiday. If there was evidence for the theory, then it would overrule the improbability. The author has this line of evidence for his theory:
The footnote reads:
Quote:
11. De solstitia et aequinoctia conceptionis et nativitatis domini nostri iesu christi et iohannis baptistae.
On the contrary, stealing the holiday is exactly what you would do.
dog-on is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 01:43 AM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England, Portsmouth
Posts: 5,108
Default

In that case I'm taking 25th of December for FSM!

Damn it. :devil1:
The Dagda is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 07:49 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
Default

What amuses me is when atheists co-opt pagan traditions (Solstice Tree?) in order to avoid celebrating a Christian holiday which itself co-opted the same pagan traditions.
James Brown is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 07:54 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesABrown View Post
What amuses me is when atheists co-opt pagan traditions (Solstice Tree?) in order to avoid celebrating a Christian holiday which itself co-opted the same pagan traditions.
Well, I, an atheist, like Christmas.
dog-on is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 07:22 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,405
Default

I love christmas -- I love the whole season. I wish everyone a happy holiday/merry christmas with abandon. Freaks out my fundy friends, who keep wiating for me to "reject" christmas and declare war on it, I guess. How can I even say christmas without bursting into flames, they must wonder.

I have a hard time seeing Solstice as a religious holiday, though. It's so basic to the turning of the seasons, the shortest day of the year, the change to longer days and shorter nights-- many religious and non-religious groups have celebrations that coincide with the date, but that's true of a lot of days. The whole tree, thing, though, is a bit weird.

A house down the street from us has a rather odd collection of lighted and inflatable creatures in their yard -- santa, reindeer, three wise men, a extra nativity scene, a few crosses, snowmen.We laugh every time we go by, and at least once each year, some of the high school kids rearrange the various plastic people into rude tableaux.
Failte is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 09:52 PM   #28
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
It is popularly believed (and accepted by many Christians) that the Dec 25 date was chosen to coopt pagan celebrations of the solstice, or the birthdate of Sol Invictus, and it is indisputable that many elements of the Christmas celebration are pagan (the Yule log, Christmas trees, etc.)
....uhm, okaaaay, since we *know* some aspects of the Christmas celebration are of pagan origin, therefor this principle aspect is just a coincidence!? What a bizarre display of mental gymnastics.
spamandham is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 12:22 AM   #29
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia (formerly Kansas)
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesABrown View Post
What amuses me is when atheists co-opt pagan traditions (Solstice Tree?) in order to avoid celebrating a Christian holiday which itself co-opted the same pagan traditions.
I don’t see a lot of separation between Christian traditions and so-called ‘pagan’ religious observances. Come to think of it, I don’t see any! But while I’m not a fan of Christmas-New Year’s week, it bothers me not for an instant that people celebrate the winter solstice with light and greenery and decorations and colorfully wrapped doodads. Nice for the kiddies and all that! I don’t believe in God; which makes me an atheist. This doesn’t make me the Grinch who stole Christmas. Christians on the other hand, do manage to get on my bad side. Their ‘good news’ has Jesus massacring both nonbelievers and the-wrong-kind-of-believers left and right, front and back in ‘Revelations.’ Also, the joining of the political right wing with religious fundamentalism has led us to a ‘new’ version of Christmas as an ode to conspicuous consumption. Jesus, we find loves ‘us’ little consumers of doodads and hates the left for ‘stealing’ this mass-consumption day from Christianity. Instead, let’s pack every store just as Jesus intended!
HelmetWB is offline  
Old 12-05-2009, 01:48 AM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
It is popularly believed (and accepted by many Christians) that the Dec 25 date was chosen to coopt pagan celebrations of the solstice, or the birthdate of Sol Invictus, and it is indisputable that many elements of the Christmas celebration are pagan (the Yule log, Christmas trees, etc.)
....uhm, okaaaay, since we *know* some aspects of the Christmas celebration are of pagan origin, therefor this principle aspect is just a coincidence!? What a bizarre display of mental gymnastics.
The issue is that these "pagan" elements are typically rather late and geographically limited additions to the Christmas celebrations.

In order to argue that Christmas is in its origins pagan I think one has to include only elements of Christmas known to be widespread in the 1st millennium CE.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.