FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-07-2012, 08:21 AM   #121
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Just to take a quick example, one could reject the idea of a man walking on water because empirical science rejects the idea that a person could walk on water.
Amateurs who dare to misrepresent science like that only succeed in proving their conviction that Jesus did walk on water.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 11-07-2012, 08:32 AM   #122
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Sorry you don't get the point I was trying to make......

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Just to take a quick example, one could reject the idea of a man walking on water because empirical science rejects the idea that a person could walk on water.
Amateurs who dare to misrepresent science like that only succeed in proving their conviction that Jesus did walk on water.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 11-07-2012, 08:41 AM   #123
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Sorry you don't get the point I was trying to make......

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Just to take a quick example, one could reject the idea of a man walking on water because empirical science rejects the idea that a person could walk on water.
Amateurs who dare to misrepresent science like that only succeed in proving their conviction that Jesus did walk on water.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 11-07-2012, 01:51 PM   #124
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Just to take a quick example, one could reject the idea of a man walking on water because empirical science rejects the idea that a person could walk on water.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Amateurs who dare to misrepresent science like that only succeed in proving their conviction that Jesus did walk on water.
Are you not an amateur???
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-22-2012, 04:46 PM   #125
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

It would seem that the revisionist ideas of John Wansbrough on the emergence of Islam might shed light on the origins of Christianity as well. Is anyone familiar with his writing? So far I have seen a chapter from Wansbrough included in Ibn Warraq's book The Quest for the Historical Muhammad.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wansbrough

The Sectarian Milieu: Content And Composition of Islamic Salvation History (or via: amazon.co.uk)
Duvduv is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.