FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-06-2005, 06:37 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Rosson III
Like Chris, I've read Carlson's book. It's convincing. I blogged a couple of posts about it:

http://lorenrosson.blogspot.com/2005...ention-of.html

http://lorenrosson.blogspot.com/2005...spel-hoax.html
Hey Loren! Glad you could finally make it here.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 06:38 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeWallack
Secret Mark on the other hand, has the Possible, such as Jesus being Gay.
Jesus isn't being depicted as day in the Secret Gospel. Heck, even all the way in the 19th century males "spending the night with" other males was fairly common - look at Abraham Lincoln, for example. And male intimacy was even moreso common during those times than today. Perhaps you may remember the photograph of President Bush and (I believe) the King of Saudi Arabia holding hands?

Quote:
The External evidence for Secret Mark, compared to "Mark" is also interesting as it was supposedly discovered by a known person who just happened to be a Bible scholar, at a known location at a known time and supposedly quoted by an early Church Father who would have been a hostile witness.
Morton Smith had already left the church at this time, and his further works (aka Jesus the Magician) show that he had no love for the orthodoxy.

Quote:
My first question to you Cris is that with Mr. Carlson being Christian does his book illustrate a motivation to Out Secret Mark for religious reasons?
Carlson, which I can't say for too many others, has always seemed to work without the problem of usual Christian bias. I doubt any here would argue that Carlson is some sort of apologist. In fact, until you mentioned it, I had no idea that he was a Christian.

Quote:
The second question I have is did Mr. Carlson deal with the Vorkosigan Chiasms in his book. I'm guessing that Mr. Carlson considers chiasms one of the bad reasons for Markan priority. In Dart's related book Dart takes Secret Mark as completing chiasms in "Mark" and therefore concludes that this proves that Secret Mark is authentic. To me (and I believe Vork also) Dart's attempted construction of chiams using Secret Mark is unconvincing and therefore proves the opposite - the lack of well defined chiasms in Secret Mark is evidence that it is a Forgery. I would assume that Smith never recognized the chiastic structure of "Mark".
He didn't need to address this. The evidence he presented was enough. Plus, I think addressing that would be a little out of bounds for him.

Chris
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 08:17 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeWallack
JW:
The problem with Christian Bible scholarship is that it is Christian Bible scholarship.
This is one of the most frequent--and most empty--ad hocs issued on this forum. Whether or not an author is Christian is irrelevant, and the criticism is nothing more than an easy out for someone who doesn't want to address an argument.

By way of perhaps the best example, few critical scholars (as opposed to apologists) in the field of NT studies are more conservative in their positions than the late Fr. Raymond Brown. Yet Brown, if inadvertantly, has probably done more to forward the idea that the Passion narrative is wholesale fiction than any other scholar, living or dead. There is no such thing as a modern commentary or analysis of the Passion that is not directly or indirectly dependent on Brown's monumental two volume work, The Death of the Messiah. As an ironic testament to its influence, the dependence frequently goes uncited--Brown's readings are so undeniably correct that, once pointed out, it becomes ludicrous to suggest that there is any other apt reading, and so they are quickly chalked up to some sort of common knowledge.

Yet when one points out the similarity between Judas Iscariot and Judah of Technicolor Dream Coat fame, or reflects on the parallel of the only two hanged individuals (Iscariot and Absalom) in Jewish literature both being traitors, and so on, it is never suggested that it needs to be subjected to a more critical eye because of Brown's Catholic background.

Right is right, regardless of who says it.

Regards,
Rick Sumner
Rick Sumner is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 09:00 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
Hey Loren! Glad you could finally make it here.
Thanks, Chris. Hope to get more involved in some of the discussions.
Loren Rosson III is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.