FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2007, 06:07 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anders View Post
It's possible that I'm exagerrating a tiny bit, but I think that the former Archbishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sweden might label Bishop John Shelby Spong a conservative.
Wow. I thought "left of Spong" was like "North of the North Pole".

Is that anything to do with him being the former Archbishop?
Tim Holt is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 07:16 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeichman View Post
You might want to look into the work of the Jesus Seminar and some of its fellows, such as Marcus Borg, JD Crossan, and Robert Funk. They all wrote popular-level works on the historical Jesus. I think some Jesus Seminar members (Robert Miller comes to mind) go on tours of churches and do lectures on the parables, the historical Jesus, and similar things.
These guys are even worse actually, because they do know better yet they don't bring up issues that they know contradict articles of faith.

They don't come in and say, "Well, let me tell you about the latest scholarly opinions. Due to careful study we now conclude that there was no virgin birth, the early church fathers totally misunderstood the pedigree of the Gospels, and all of us theologians doubt the miracles of Jesus, and even most of what it is claimed that he said in the Gospels."

That would be honest, and that is what they know themselves, but they don't say it. They are the worst hypocrites of all....
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 07:45 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

http://www.monachos.net/forum/archiv...hp?t-2311.html

Quote:
2002.12.22 Telegraph:

Quarter of clergy do not believe in the Virgin Birth

By Chris Hastings and Fiona Govan
Quote:
The view of a Hampshire vicar was typical. "There was nothing special about
his birth or childhood - it was his adult life that was extraordinary," he
said.

He declined to be named, saying: "I have a very traditional bishop and this
is one of those topics I do not go public on. I need to keep the job I have
got."
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 04:25 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
http://www.monachos.net/forum/archiv...hp?t-2311.html

Quote:
2002.12.22 Telegraph:

Quarter of clergy do not believe in the Virgin Birth

By Chris Hastings and Fiona Govan
Quote:
The view of a Hampshire vicar was typical. "There was nothing special about
his birth or childhood - it was his adult life that was extraordinary," he
said.

He declined to be named, saying: "I have a very traditional bishop and this
is one of those topics I do not go public on. I need to keep the job I have
got."
Sounds about right....
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 09:31 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeichman View Post
You might want to look into the work of the Jesus Seminar and some of its fellows, such as Marcus Borg, JD Crossan, and Robert Funk. They all wrote popular-level works on the historical Jesus. I think some Jesus Seminar members (Robert Miller comes to mind) go on tours of churches and do lectures on the parables, the historical Jesus, and similar things.
These guys are even worse actually, because they do know better yet they don't bring up issues that they know contradict articles of faith.

They don't come in and say, "Well, let me tell you about the latest scholarly opinions. Due to careful study we now conclude that there was no virgin birth, the early church fathers totally misunderstood the pedigree of the Gospels, and all of us theologians doubt the miracles of Jesus, and even most of what it is claimed that he said in the Gospels."

That would be honest, and that is what they know themselves, but they don't say it. They are the worst hypocrites of all....
Have you READ anything by the Jesus Seminar? That's EXACTLY what they do, and have been demonized for by some conservatives. I'd suggest flipping through The Acts of Jesus or reading the introduction to The Five Gospels. It will be abundantly clear that this is exactly what they do.
Zeichman is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 09:36 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeichman View Post
Have you READ anything by the Jesus Seminar? That's EXACTLY what they do, and have been demonized for by some conservatives. I'd suggest flipping through The Acts of Jesus or reading the introduction to The Five Gospels. It will be abundantly clear that this is exactly what they do.
Oh no Zeichman! Don't actually make Malachi read the stuff. Then he wouldn't be able to get on his high horse and make untrue statements about the scholars he knows nothing about!
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 10:49 AM   #17
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 3
Default

The Fellows of the Westar Institute include scholars with advanced degrees in biblical studies, religion or related fields and, by special invitation only, published authors who are recognized authorities in the field of religion. Since the beginning, more than two hundred Fellows have participated in the Jesus Seminar and other Westar projects, including the Paul Seminar, Canon Seminar and the recently begun Acts Seminar. At various stages of the projects, different Fellows have been involved in the research and deliberations. http://westarinstitute.org/Fellows/fellows.html
LAMII is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 11:35 AM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge AB Canada
Posts: 445
Default

The New Revised Standard Version has an extra passage at the end of 1 Samuel 10 that is included because it was discovered in one of the Qumran scrolls of Samuel and many scholars argued that it was errantly omitted by one scribe and his work formed the basis of all other copies that were known about until the Qumran discoveries.

I think there may be other good examples of translations relying on the work of text-critics.
DrJim is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 02:58 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western Sweden
Posts: 3,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Holt View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by anders View Post
It's possible that I'm exagerrating a tiny bit, but I think that the former Archbishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sweden might label Bishop John Shelby Spong a conservative.
Wow. I thought "left of Spong" was like "North of the North Pole".

Is that anything to do with him being the former Archbishop?
Not very probable. Many like him, even if many don't. He leaves just 18 months before retirement age, for "personal reasons". That isn't very uncommon. To the facts on what he thinks and what he has been working for on Wiki, like that among many other things, he has been fighting for amnesty for refugees in Sweden, debt relief for poor countries, humane treatment of prisoners and tolerance towards followers of other religions than Christianity, I'd like to add that he was the last archbishop to be appointed by the Government. Now, there's a total separation between Church and State.
Lugubert is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.