FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-16-2012, 05:53 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Yes, lots of issue with the Toledot Yeshu story - but like that mountain that some people just love to climb - this puzzle is also a challenge. As is, I suppose, just about everything to do with the search for early christian origins....So, while scaling the heights might not be for me - I'm quite happy to play in the mud....


Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Yes, I agree. However in this case we find Toldoth Yeshu filled with numerous examples of confusion, anachronisms and mistakes. So the name of the queen is only one of many.

Quote:
Originally Posted by maryhelena View Post
If every 'mistake' we come across can be washed away with 'the writer was confused' - then perhaps it's time to shut up shop and head for home....


Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Good point. However if the writer did not know the sources that are in the Talmud and was otherwise confused it's n ot hard to imagine confusing her name with the other perhaps more known and more recent figure.
maryhelena is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 09:55 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Personally I have my own doubts that the author(s) of the Toledoth was even a practicing Jew altogether. It is entirely possible that it was written as a tract to be used against Jews centuries later than usually identified, even by a Jew who converted to Christianity.

In any event, the underlying story is derived from the Talmud, which considered this obscure person worthy of a relatively brief mention from the 1st century BCE. If the Talmud were simply creating a parody to malign Christianity when the Talmud was sealed, it could have done a more thorough job. As it is, all that is similar with the NT Jesus is his parents and his being executed. Not the claims about him, not about his disciples, not about his travels.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:02 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

A parody? And it's placed in 90 b.c.?

As with the gospel JC story, a developing story re birth narratives, from Herod the Great to Quirinius, it's likely the Toledot has had some developments along the way. What does seem to be fixed is a birth in the time of Alexander Jannaeus and a death in the time of Queen Helene. That's my focus. 90 b.c. to when?

gLuke places Lysanias of Abilene in a time slot with Pilate - historical figures with mismatched time slots. I'm running with the idea that the Toledot Yeshu story is doing something similar. gLuke runs from 40 b.c. to around 30 c.e. (70 years of Hasmonean and Herodian history). If the identity of Queen Helene can be demonstrated - i.e. this Queen in the Toledot Yeshu is not the wife of Alexander Jannaeus but a later Queen that has been linked to Alexander Jannaeus re the birth and death of the character of Yeshu (who, like JC is a literary construct) then a wider historical time slot for this story is available.

As it stands, with a 90 b. c. birth of the Yeshu figure - and around a 30 c.e. death for the gospel JC - we are looking at 120 years of Hasmoneon and Jewish history. History that is the backbone to the creation of the two literary figures of Yeshu and JC.

What that is indicating is that the literary Yeshu figure is referencing a much earlier time period than the gospel JC. Two literary figures, two historical time frames - running to 120 years of Hasmonean and Herodian history.

To assume that the Yeshu story is a parody of the JC story is to miss the boat re literary 'evidence'; evidence that could be of value in searching for early christian origins.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Personally I have my own doubts that the author(s) of the Toledoth was even a practicing Jew altogether. It is entirely possible that it was written as a tract to be used against Jews centuries later than usually identified, even by a Jew who converted to Christianity.

In any event, the underlying story is derived from the Talmud, which considered this obscure person worthy of a relatively brief mention from the 1st century BCE. If the Talmud were simply creating a parody to malign Christianity when the Talmud was sealed, it could have done a more thorough job. As it is, all that is similar with the NT Jesus is his parents and his being executed. Not the claims about him, not about his disciples, not about his travels.
maryhelena is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:11 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Why if Queen Helena of Adiabene is our only known Jewish queen named Helena is she not the most likely candidate for the narrative? The rabbinical accounts about Jesus are problematic. It would be like speaking about having a Nation of Islam reference to 'President Washington' living at the time of Columbus. Since there is only one 'President Washington' and the source of the narrative is utterly unreliable George Washington is still the only real possibility. Why are we wasting time on this?
stephan huller is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:14 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

This is thread is a waste of time. http://books.google.com/books?id=Vxs...ene%22&f=false

Maybe because 'Helena' appears in your name you are secretly trying to claim that you are this queen.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:17 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Why if Queen Helena of Adiabene is our only known Jewish queen named Helena is she not the most likely candidate for the narrative? The rabbinical accounts about Jesus are problematic. It would be like speaking about having a Nation of Islam reference to 'President Washington' living at the time of Columbus. Since there is only one 'President Washington' and the source of the narrative is utterly unreliable George Washington is still the only real possibility. Why are we wasting time on this?
Stephan - it's my time - if you think you are wasting your time on this thread - be my guest - and move elsewhere....
maryhelena is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:20 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
This is thread is a waste of time. http://books.google.com/books?id=Vxs...ene%22&f=false

Maybe because 'Helena' appears in your name you are secretly trying to claim that you are this queen.
Stephan - so it's back to the personal remarks now.....that is unacceptable...:angry:
maryhelena is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:24 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

It could be only because the text authored by whomever is filled with errors, contradictions and anachronisms, so it can't be taken all that seriously even on this one point. No one is forcing you to participate in this thread as far as I know. So what do you care?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Why if Queen Helena of Adiabene is our only known Jewish queen named Helena is she not the most likely candidate for the narrative? The rabbinical accounts about Jesus are problematic. It would be like speaking about having a Nation of Islam reference to 'President Washington' living at the time of Columbus. Since there is only one 'President Washington' and the source of the narrative is utterly unreliable George Washington is still the only real possibility. Why are we wasting time on this?
Duvduv is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 02:00 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

this is like trying to find historicity in a superman comic book


PULLLEASE
outhouse is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 02:03 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Quite right. That's just what I was thinking on the subject of the First Apology of Justin.

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
this is like trying to find historicity in a superman comic book


PULLLEASE
Duvduv is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.