FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2013, 04:02 AM   #21
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle east
Posts: 829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv
Do we see a reproduction of the undocumented and unproven legendary origins of Christians in Mesopotamia prior to the 4th or 5th century?
1. Bardaisan
(and, n.b. according to this Wikipedia article, Bardaisan's writings influenced another Osrhoener: Mani.

2. But, since all of Bardaisan's writings have disappeared, today, we are obliged to rely upon the critical commentary of Ephrem the Syrian, writing a century later.

3. If you believe the findings excavated at Dura Europos, then, there is further evidence of Christian belief and practice in 3rd century Mesopotamia. I deny the authenticity of the papyrus P24, "discovered" among the buckets of dirt, supposed to represent Tatian's Diatessaron. In my opinion this fragment was left there by Julian's troops in the 4th Century, thirty five years after Nicea, else forged by Pope Pius XI, and then deposited into the bucket of earth, sticking out, in plain view, to be discovered by Hopkins.

tanya is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 06:32 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

I don't think it's possible to make the argument for Christianity in Mesopotamia before the 4th century dependent on that single excavation area which is not even in Mesopotamia, and is far from Ctesiphon and other centers.
The argument for Christianity before the 4th or 5th century in Mesopotamia is rather weak.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv
Do we see a reproduction of the undocumented and unproven legendary origins of Christians in Mesopotamia prior to the 4th or 5th century?
1. Bardaisan
(and, n.b. according to this Wikipedia article, Bardaisan's writings influenced another Osrhoener: Mani.

2. But, since all of Bardaisan's writings have disappeared, today, we are obliged to rely upon the critical commentary of Ephrem the Syrian, writing a century later.

3. If you believe the findings excavated at Dura Europos, then, there is further evidence of Christian belief and practice in 3rd century Mesopotamia. I deny the authenticity of the papyrus P24, "discovered" among the buckets of dirt, supposed to represent Tatian's Diatessaron. In my opinion this fragment was left there by Julian's troops in the 4th Century, thirty five years after Nicea, else forged by Pope Pius XI, and then deposited into the bucket of earth, sticking out, in plain view, to be discovered by Hopkins.

Duvduv is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 06:42 AM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden, Europe
Posts: 12,091
Default

I know nothing but this text says he is Thomas the Twin the Doubter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_...mption_of_Mary
Quote:
According to The Passing of Mary, a text attributed to Joseph of Arimathaea,[10] Thomas was the only witness of the Assumption of Mary into heaven. The other apostles were miraculously transported to Jerusalem to witness her death. Thomas was left in India, but after her first burial he was transported to her tomb, where he witnessed her bodily assumption into heaven, from which she dropped her girdle. In an inversion of the story of Thomas' doubts, the other apostles are skeptical of Thomas' story until they see the empty tomb and the girdle.
i get the impression these writers had something very particular
they wanted to accomplish. Some power struggle or some niche
to carve out for them to work from or within.

Mary being resurrected in same way as Jesus into Heaven.

Edit. My wild guess this is their version of what
Rebecca Watson and the Atheism Plus people do now.
they come from outside and then do a reinterpretation.

Old White Privileged Men like Dawkins are on their way out
and the Mary Magdalen is on the way in and will be the new
way to relate to what counts as progressive.

Way back there and then they still was into Assumption into heaven
while we are into whom to see as progressive and whom to be bigot
and misogynist.
wordy is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 10:51 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Mountainman 2

One of the oldest documents we have from Semitic Christianity is/are the Acts of Judas (called 'the twin'). Please tell me why a fourth century forger would want to make a tradition about Judas - someone who is usually disliked by Christians. Whether or not this is 'Judas Iscariot' (I think it is) the idea of venerating an apostle named Judas seems strange, doesn't it? They could have taken any number of 'invented' names. Why this one?
Not strange if the Acts of Judas were composed before other gospel writers had invented and inserted the Judas evil the betrayer tale.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 11:30 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Eusebius even asserts there were Christian bishops in the Persian capital city in the 3rd century.

The emerging early Christians were everywhere !!!
How terrifying.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 02:09 PM   #26
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Eusebius even asserts there were Christian bishops in the Persian capital city in the 3rd century.

The emerging early Christians were everywhere !!!
How terrifying.
According to Eusebius this new emerging class of people were very powerful and wise and had the power to disrupt and shut down the communications link between the priests of Apollo and Apollo himself. Diocletian was terrified of this power because he often sought advice from the priests of Apollo, and he therefore persecuted the Christian hackers.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 04:51 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Eusebius even asserts there were Christian bishops in the Persian capital city in the 3rd century.

The emerging early Christians were everywhere !!!
How terrifying.
According to Eusebius this new emerging class of people were very powerful and wise and had the power to disrupt and shut down the communications link between the priests of Apollo and Apollo himself. Diocletian was terrified of this power because he often sought advice from the priests of Apollo, and he therefore persecuted the Christian hackers.
Good heavens, cobber. It's amazing that the Aussie government hasn't done likewise.

sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 09:10 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Here is a sample of history of Christians in Mesopotamia even prior to and at the dawn of the 4th century with no data to corroborate the existence of these Christians who were massacred:

http://www.kaldaya.net/Symposium/_Sy...html#_ftnref16

The churches in Mesopotamia were simply a loose collection of independent congregations and preaching outposts, related by fellowship with one another and by the spirit of loyalty and martyrdom XE "Martyrs" to their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ XE "Christ"

The subsequent history of Persian Christianity in the fourth century was marked by growing hostility on the part of the government, increasing isolation from the churches in the West, and outright persecution against the faithful by the Persian state. Beginning in 339, tens of thousands of believers were slaughtered, church buildings and shrines were destroyed, and no effort was spared by those in power who were seeking the utter destruction of the Church of the East. The number of those who are known by name amount to 16,000, but there were countless numbers of others whose names are not recorded. Beginning with the catholicos, Mar Shimun bar Sabbai, who had been commanded to worship the sun but refused to do so, the carnage spread until it became one of the worst periods of persecution in the history of the Christian Church, whether East or West. There was, of course, nothing in the way of synodal gatherings during this dark period, which continued until AD 383, when the death of the emperor, Ardashir II, brought a period of peace.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 12:38 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
2. But, since all of Bardaisan's writings have disappeared, today
There is the Book of the Laws of the Countries, although some scholars assign it to a disciple.

Quote:
we are obliged to rely upon the critical commentary of Ephrem the Syrian, writing a century later.
Eusebius also discusses Bardaisan. And, indeed, lists bishops from Mesopotamia. He had good connections with the Syriac speaking world, as is shown by the fact that one of his works is extant in Syriac translation in a copy written in 411 AD (!) and his Church History in Armenian is based on a Syriac version written even earlier.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 10:30 AM   #30
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
we are obliged to rely upon the critical commentary of Ephrem the Syrian, writing a century later.
Eusebius also discusses Bardaisan. And, indeed, lists bishops from Mesopotamia. He had good connections with the Syriac speaking world, as is shown by the fact that one of his works is extant in Syriac translation in a copy written in 411 AD (!)
How does an English translation of this compare to the English translation in the public domain? (Or was it used in reconstruction?)

Do you happen to know whether there many differences?



Quote:
..and his Church History in Armenian is based on a Syriac version written even earlier.
So how much before 411 CE would this be?

And do you have any idea why Eusebius Greek Church history appears on the list of prohibited books in the Decretum Gelasianum?
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.