FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2010, 11:28 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default Please, explain 1 Corinthians 14:34

"Women should remain silent in the churches.
They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says."

NIV

Why did Paul appeal to the Law?
[Where in the Law of Moses does it say such a thing?... And they must be in submission to what?...]
Julio is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 12:43 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

It seems most likely that Paul did not write this, as he worked with women who prophesied in the churches. It is probably a later interpolation, possibly by someone who had a problem with a particular woman preacher.

http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/14-34.htm

Quote:
This, in view of other portions of the Scriptures, is confessedly a difficult passage. We have the same teaching in 1 Ti 2:11,12. On the other hand, Deborah was a judge and a prophetess (Jud 4:4); Huldah was a prophetess (1Ki 22:14); Joel predicted that in the Christian dispensation the sons and 'daughters' should prophesy (Joe 2:28), and Peter declared that this was fulfilled on the Day of Pentecost (Ac 2:4). In addition, the daughters of Philip prophesied (Ac 21:9), and Paul gives directions concerning women prophesying in 1 Co 11:5. ...
This source can only suggest Gen 3:16 as the "law" that is referred to, but this says nothing about women preaching in public.

This verse gives evangelical Christians a lot of problems, and they have spent a considerable amount of time trying to work around it.
Toto is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 01:07 AM   #3
Moderator - Miscellaneous Discussions
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shenzhen, S.E. China (UK ex-pat)
Posts: 14,249
Cool

Moved to BCH.
MrFrosty is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 01:32 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post
"Women should remain silent in the churches.
They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says."

NIV

Why did Paul appeal to the Law?
[Where in the Law of Moses does it say such a thing?... And they must be in submission to what?...]
Why not try another approach - one not taking Paul literally in this case. Try a figurative approach. Women representing our intellectual or spiritual ability - and man representing out bodily, physical reality. Thus: ideas (represented by 'women') need to be subject to reality (represented by 'men') in order to have some relevance to our lives. Free floating ideas, floating abstractions, might well be interesting as novelties etc - but the real deal is when our ideas are subject to, relate to, our physical realities. In other words, in Paul' terms - when women are subject to men....
maryhelena is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 01:39 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Fits better as an anti Marcion insertion, Mary.
dog-on is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 01:59 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 5,746
Default

Slightly off topic. In a Swedish debate when a female fundie Christian was arguing against homosexuality with the Swedish archbishop of the church of Sweden, he answered with this quote. Then he added, "be careful with how you read the Bible." The church of Sweden is very pro-gay and we have a whole bunch of gay priests, and sex positive priests. Priests who make too much noise against gay priests have been fired.
DrZoidberg is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 02:23 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post
Fits better as an anti Marcion insertion, Mary.
But if it is not an insertion - then depending upon the dating of Paul - if his letters were written, lets say for the sake of argument, 10 years from the destruction of Jerusalem - then Paul' point re women subject to men would be earlier than Marcion. Marcion or not - I don't think I'd be buying Paul' argument if taken literally. So, I'll be giving him the benefit of doubt and appeal to his better angels.....:angel:
maryhelena is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 02:34 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maryhelena View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post
Fits better as an anti Marcion insertion, Mary.
But if it is not an insertion - then depending upon the dating of Paul - if his letters were written, lets say for the sake of argument, 10 years from the destruction of Jerusalem - then Paul' point re women subject to men would be earlier than Marcion. Marcion or not - I don't think I'd be buying Paul' argument if taken literally. So, I'll be giving him the benefit of doubt and appeal to his better angels.....:angel:
From my understanding, women played active roles in the Marcionite churches. The early catholics had a differing view and made Paul fit that view.
dog-on is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 04:45 AM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maryhelena View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post
"Women should remain silent in the churches.
They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says."

NIV

Why did Paul appeal to the Law?
[Where in the Law of Moses does it say such a thing?... And they must be in submission to what?...]
Why not try another approach - one not taking Paul literally in this case. Try a figurative approach. Women representing our intellectual or spiritual ability - and man representing out bodily, physical reality. Thus: ideas (represented by 'women') need to be subject to reality (represented by 'men') in order to have some relevance to our lives. Free floating ideas, floating abstractions, might well be interesting as novelties etc - but the real deal is when our ideas are subject to, relate to, our physical realities. In other words, in Paul' terms - when women are subject to men....
Would you see that as an acceptable possibility?
In that case, where would the text switch from the allegorical/figurative to literal?
I think the best approach is to understand the verse literally.
But I'm here to learn.
Julio is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 04:47 AM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post
Fits better as an anti Marcion insertion, Mary.
Oh!
That is a very interesting point.
Was Marcion offended with women speaking in tongues or trying to lecture to men?
Julio is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.