dr lazer blast

Had to re do the story, I honestly intended it to be this way in the first place and I caught an error I made looking at it again.

This story is written and observed by only me and nobody else. Everything in this story is true.
A Man named frank died at 1:00 am March 15th 2003. Sue came to visit frank by herself with nobody else at 2:00am. The 2nd women named Mary came to vist with Sue at 2:00am. They began digging up franks grave on march 14th at 10:00 pm and they found the body of frank on march 14th 2003 at 10:01pm. Every mention of frank is talking about the same person (which is the guy that died at 1:00am March 15th 2003)

Amaleq13

When she already knew he had been anointed and that there was a huge rock blocking the entrance? Yes.

Kharakov

Mary came to visit with Sue while Sue went to visit with Frank.
Unfortunately for Frank, who had been buried alive, complications from lack of Oxygen lead to his death the next day at 1:00am.

Do you see how easy apologetics is? If it makes you feel any better, when I was younger, I made up the exact same story that you did, under the same screen name, in an alternate universe, and made the same mistakes that you did.

dr lazer blast

How could someone find the dead body before they died?

Kharakov

You didn't say dead body, you said body.

Perhaps if you said Frank had died 70 years before they dug him up?
In which case I would say that Frank was obviously a time traveler.

Here you go, try this story:

Nobody has ever traveled through time.
This story is about the same Frank in all instances.
Frank died 3 days ago (6,6,8) and stayed dead forever, this happened in all dimensions of reality.
Today (6,9,8) someone saw Frank alive, and it was not a case of mistaken identity or an illusion of any sort.

dr lazer blast

ok, I concede on my story as obviously I didn't think it through good enough.

your story is a contradiction, are you going to address the easter challenge any time soon?

Kharakov

Yeah. How about the bible? Since it can be interpreted in so many different ways, and obviously is interpreted in many different ways due to the numerous branches of Christianity, do you concede on it? (Note that I am not saying you cannot gain understanding from it or that it is not inspired by God, I am just saying, as the bible says, have respect for the forces of the underworld, such as I).
Nah. I won't tear down what I made. You try. There is a way, but I won't tell you.

thentian

That person was Dr Gedanken, who is the first human to have travelled through a man-created worm-hole to a position three light-days from earth. He directed a powerful telescope towards earth and saw it as it was three days ago!

My turn?

Okay, assuming that everything in the bible is literally true: Give me the genealogy of Jesus! (Matt 1:1-6 and Luke 3:23-31)

Cheers!

dr lazer blast

rofl, ROFL, I should concede on the bible because it can be interpreted in many different ways, because I conceded on my poorly thought out, quickly typed, made up, contradiction stroy? rrrriiiiigggghhhhhttttt.

Nah you won't respond to the easter narritive?

[/QUOTE]
I thought it was my turn to make a story (according to the rule)

Kharakov

And the winner is:

Here ya go, apologetics already did it:
http://www.answering-islam.org/BibleCom/mt1-1.html