FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-09-2005, 12:24 AM   #51
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: auckland nz
Posts: 18,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RUmike
I think what convinced me personally of Jesus' likelihood as an historical figure was the fact that his followers claimed he was crucified. If people were trying to invent a Messiah, I see it as incredibly unlikely that they would have said he died by crucifixion. That fact alone convinced most Jews of the 1st century that Jesus could not have by any possibility been the Messiah, and rightly so.
but they also claimed that was for a very good reason and that he rose from the dead 3 days later. Thats one of the things that convinced me against a historical Jesus.
NZSkep is offline  
Old 11-09-2005, 12:42 PM   #52
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZSkep
but they also claimed that was for a very good reason and that he rose from the dead 3 days later. Thats one of the things that convinced me against a historical Jesus.
My opinion is that those claims were invented (as you do) but to explain away the crucifixion, not created in conjunction with them.
RUmike is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.