FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2009, 08:23 PM   #101
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

Yes, I don't like Craig either, but address the points he makes.
TimBowe is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:25 PM   #102
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark View Post
.... What I'm asking (again) is why you trust them to tell you about historical documents not containing any mention of Jesus, but then don't trust them to tell you there is still solid evidence for him. You've got to be consistent. And since they spend their lives studying this stuff (and many are non-believers) I trust their opinions more than yours.
I have consistently asked for the solid evidence but none have surfaced. I don't trust people who claim that there is solid evidence and then cannot provide one single credible source external of the Church.

And some of these people may also there claim there is solid evidence for heaven.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Have you read every single document or heard every oral conversation, in every language, about Achilles or Mermaids?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark
Can you find any mythology scholars claiming they existed?
Can you find any scholar who claim Jesus was a myth?
aa5874 is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:26 PM   #103
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
That's my whole point, you people arguing for the nonexistence hypothesis are in a minority . I understand that none of you care, but that wont change the fact that it is essentially without supporters in academic circles.
We could have the same debate with merlin and king arthur but since they are not religions there are not many who really care. Do you still not get it mate?
And no response to why you posted a link to a site that refuted what you said?

It is not rational to expect a person living 2000 years later to know whether a story written back then is based on reality. Any god that based "salvation" on such a necessity would be a monster.

The people who accept christianity would just as easily accept another religion if they were born into it.

The people who escape chistianity would probably escape Islam or mormonism too and those that don't like to question chistianity cause it's not the done thing would also be stuck in those other religions too.

Can't have your cake and eat it too.
Transient is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:27 PM   #104
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
No. I have read all the documents that historicists claim as evidence, but only in English translations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
How many of the New Testament works actually come from 1st century Palestine?
I don't know whether any of them did. I took the question to mean, "Have you actually looked at all the evidence?" And the answer is: Yes, I have.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:28 PM   #105
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe
Yes, I don't like Craig either, but address the points he makes.
They have already been addressed a thousand times and more on these forums, that's what makes your cut and paste job so pathetic and so funny.
Do a search
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:30 PM   #106
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

You are really very smart mate, I hope we can keep having this discussion mate.Were are you from mate, Australia, of course thats why you keeping saying mate, huh mate.
TimBowe is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:32 PM   #107
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East of ginger trees
Posts: 12,637
Default

Tim, may I ask you a question? Your profile says "atheist", and I think you confirmed it some time back.

So why is it soooooo important to you that we here "see the light" about the historicity of Jesus as you see it? I don't get it.....
Barefoot Bree is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:32 PM   #108
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimBowe View Post
You are really very smart mate, I hope we can keep having this discussion mate.Were are you from mate, Australia, of course thats why you keeping saying mate, huh mate.
Still going to dodge the question and revert to insults now?
Transient is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:33 PM   #109
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,936
Default

Wait, is the association of someone to Australia an insult now?
Ktotwf is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:34 PM   #110
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
Default

Because the Christ myth theory is not accepted by mainstream critical scholarship. It's really very simple.
TimBowe is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.