FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-19-2009, 08:35 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
Question How was Mary chosen?

What is the criteria to be regarded as worthy of being the mother of God?

In Bible, the angel simply comes to Mary but what was so special about her that she was selected over other women?

RC speaks of Immaculate Conception, but that just pushes the problem further. Why were Mary's parents considered to be worthy of this honour of bearing a child without original sin?

The Bible does not explain anything.
hinduwoman is offline  
Old 08-19-2009, 08:46 AM   #2
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

Accident?
premjan is offline  
Old 08-19-2009, 08:50 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Read the Infancy Evangelion of James. I mean, it's not canonical and thus not historical... but there's hardly anything "historical" in the canonical gospels.
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 08-19-2009, 08:58 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
Default

Wouldn't she have to be sinless too? Isn't sin supposedly passed through the blood?
xaxxat is offline  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:27 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
Default

Hi Folks,

Quote:
Originally Posted by xaxxat
Wouldn't she have to be sinless too? Isn't sin supposedly passed through the blood?
Passed through the male, the late Arthur Custance (Doorway Papers) writes about this nicely.

Good question, and the basics of some major doctrinal misunderstandings in both RCC and some 'Protestant' teachings.

Shalom,
Steven Avery
Steven Avery is offline  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:50 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Avery View Post
Hi Folks,

Quote:
Originally Posted by xaxxat
Wouldn't she have to be sinless too? Isn't sin supposedly passed through the blood?
Passed through the male, the late Arthur Custance (Doorway Papers) writes about this nicely.

Good question, and the basics of some major doctrinal misunderstandings in both RCC and some 'Protestant' teachings.

Shalom,
Steven Avery
So females are sinless?
xaxxat is offline  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:56 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
Default

Hi Folks,

Quote:
Originally Posted by xaxxat
So females are sinless?
No, their seed is not the vessel for the transmission of the yetzer hara.

Shalom,
Steven Avery
Steven Avery is offline  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:00 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xaxxat View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Avery View Post
Hi Folks,

Passed through the male, the late Arthur Custance (Doorway Papers) writes about this nicely.

Good question, and the basics of some major doctrinal misunderstandings in both RCC and some 'Protestant' teachings.

Shalom,
Steven Avery
So females are sinless?
The better explanation is that 1st century science didn't know that women actually had eggs. They just thought that the woman's womb was an incubator for the man's sperm. It was the sperm itself that grew into a human being, not male sperm fertilizing female eggs. They had no idea why women had their periods.

Understanding this, this is what allowed the gospel writer(s) to declare immaculate conception. It wasn't that the "holy spirit" combined with Mary's eggs. The "holy spirit" simply grew inside of Mary's womb - thus Jesus didn't share any blood with Mary.

When it was discovered that women had eggs, then you start getting all of these modern questions about sin and blood and all that nonsense. The creators of the virgin birth story didn't need to explain that because they didn't think that Jesus and Mary shared any DNA.
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:04 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Avery View Post
Hi Folks,

Quote:
Originally Posted by xaxxat
So females are sinless?
No, their seed is not the vessel for the transmission of the yetzer hara.

Shalom,
Steven Avery
Do you have a source for that view Steven?

It sounds Talmudic.

Thanks
semiopen is offline  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:07 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Avery View Post
Hi Folks,

Quote:
Originally Posted by xaxxat
So females are sinless?
No, their seed is not the vessel for the transmission of the yetzer hara.

Shalom,
Steven Avery
What do you mean by "seed"?
xaxxat is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.