FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-19-2011, 01:46 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by archibald View Post
I might readily take off numbers 1 and 8.
I can understand taking 1 off the list, but out of interest why would you remove 8?
It does not seem like a likely scenario. I haven't yet heard a convincing case for it.
archibald is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 01:55 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
I wonder whether it would be easier to discuss the likelihood of various possible explanations if you first defined more explicitly what it is that you are trying to explain.

It might not be unreasonable to say that the number of possible HJ scenarios, as indeed he number of MJ scenarios, is very large indeed. I wouldn't be even tempted to pick one and try to pin a case on it. :]

I've seen too many threads get lost in that particular quagmire. What happens is that people start arguing about trees (and even what types of moss are on a particular tree) , which is fine, detail is useful, essential even, but such debates often lose site of the woods, IMO.

Perhaps my willingness to opt for certain items on Price's (not exclusive I'm sure) list of options as posted by mountainman might give you some idea.

Oh by the way, I have just noticed that this list refers only to 'gospel accounts'. I had misread that. It's slightly different to 'HJ explanations', since it doesn't cover Paul, for one thing. But it's still an interesting list, and I think Price is a pretty decent writer.

If that's still too vague for you, I can have another go. :]
archibald is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 02:02 AM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
So the idea of Gospels as "scripture" was something that only started to appear in the second half of the Second Century.
What then do you think of the two references in 1 Cor 15:3 & 4 to "the scriptures"?

(They are obviously not the Hebrew "scriptures", as Paul has focused his proselytes away from Jewish materials and motivations.)
spin is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 02:48 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,305
Default

Romans 1:2 'Scriptures of the prophets' (graphon prophetikon)

Romans 16:26 'by his prophets in the holy scriptures' (prophetikon autou in graphais hagais)


?
archibald is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 03:30 AM   #25
J-D
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archibald View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
I wonder whether it would be easier to discuss the likelihood of various possible explanations if you first defined more explicitly what it is that you are trying to explain.
It might not be unreasonable to say that the number of possible HJ scenarios, as indeed he number of MJ scenarios, is very large indeed. I wouldn't be even tempted to pick one and try to pin a case on it. :]

I've seen too many threads get lost in that particular quagmire. What happens is that people start arguing about trees (and even what types of moss are on a particular tree) , which is fine, detail is useful, essential even, but such debates often lose site of the woods, IMO.

Perhaps my willingness to opt for certain items on Price's (not exclusive I'm sure) list of options as posted by mountainman might give you some idea.

Oh by the way, I have just noticed that this list refers only to 'gospel accounts'. I had misread that. It's slightly different to 'HJ explanations', since it doesn't cover Paul, for one thing. But it's still an interesting list, and I think Price is a pretty decent writer.

If that's still too vague for you, I can have another go. :]
I'll try again, in dialogue form.

Scene: the consulting room of a Great Detective.
The Detective is sitting behind the desk.
The client enters.

Client: I hope you can help me.
The Great Detective: I hope so too. Are you seeking the solution to a mystery?
Client: Yes, I'm trying to decide what's the most likely explanation.
The Great Detective: Ah! The most likely explanation for what?
Client: Look, I know there's more than one possible answer.
The Great Detective: That may be so. What is the question?
Client: I don't want to get too bogged down in the details of all the different scenarios.
The Great Detective: Yes, I can see that, but what is the mystery you are trying to solve?
Client: I'm just trying to make sense of the overall pattern.
The Great Detective: Am I not speaking English here? Or are you not? What is this pattern of which you speak? Can you possibly be even a little bit more specific? Have you perhaps heard the story of the people who programmed a computer to tell them the answer to the Great Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything?
Client: What did it say?
The Great Detective: It said the answer was 'forty-two', which didn't help them much. Do you see what mistake they had made?
Client: Um ... no?
The Great Detective: I suspected as much. They had made the same mistake that you are making. The computer pointed out to them that the answer didn't help because they didn't know what the question was. Oh, yes, they knew it was 'the Great Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything', but what actually was it? They thought that was obvious, but it wasn't! Not even to themselves, when they took the trouble to stop and think about it!
Client: Well, I just want to know what the more likely overall explanation is.
The Great Detective (seizing Client by the lapels and enunciating with great precision): The ... more ... likely ... overall ... explanation ... FOR ... WHAT?
J-D is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 03:42 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
So the idea of Gospels as "scripture" was something that only started to appear in the second half of the Second Century.
What then do you think of the two references in 1 Cor 15:3 & 4 to "the scriptures"?

(They are obviously not the Hebrew "scriptures", as Paul has focused his proselytes away from Jewish materials and motivations.)
I've just assumed that Paul has pulled this from the Hebrew scriptures. What is your take?

1 Cor 15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 03:42 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,305
Default

I'm sorry J-D. I thought it was blindingly obvious in the title.

explanation for........the appearance of the Jesus character,

....in extant texts.
archibald is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 07:32 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stringbean View Post
I don't see Paul as a contemporary of jesus.
I could say the same thing, but if I did I would be begging the historicity question. If Jesus existed, then Paul was a contemporary of his. Being contemporary does not entail being personally acquainted.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 07:35 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archibald View Post
I'm sorry J-D. I thought it was blindingly obvious in the title.

explanation for........the appearance of the Jesus character,

....in extant texts.
Any number of reasons I suppose. Historical existence being but one of them.
dog-on is offline  
Old 09-19-2011, 08:17 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 758
Default

In answer to the OP. yes, an HJ is a more probable explanation than any of the explanations offered by the mythers all of which rest on unlikely assumptions and claims.

Steve
Juststeve is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:34 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.