FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-25-2010, 12:37 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post

Great, that rescues the mythicist interpretation a little, even though those uses are in Hebrew.
Please note that this interpretation is not confined to mythicism.
Thanks, noted.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The LXX treats this as a proper name and transliterates it as Αχιας in 1 Kings 11. You can check other verses using blueletterbible.org
Thanks again!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
... After that, "brother of YHWH" would not be the same as "brother of the Lord," ...
?? But it is exactly the same.
Not really. If we are talking about Greek, the word "κυριου" is used the same way that we use the word "lord." It could be God or it could be a human being. See the LXX 1 Kings 1:2, for example. Either way, Paul many times uses it as a title for Jesus. The word "θεός", on the other hand, is a word used exclusively for God.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 03-25-2010, 01:27 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post

Prior to Christianity, the bare phrase "[of] the lord" in Hellenic Jewish writings almost always referred to YHWH.
Call me sick but I think this is a really interesting subject - we’ve talked about it before.

Get a load of Romans 10:9-13 and Acts 2:14-21.

Those passages depend on the absence of Yahweh in Isaiah 28, Joel 2, Psalm 16, etc.

Those passages depend on the presence of Lord (kurios) in Isaiah 28, Joel 2, Psalm 16, etc.

Those passages are written as if the authors never heard of the god called Yahweh. It has to do with "Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved." The authors cite Joel 2:32 in a way that only makes sense if the “lord” was a nameless divinity separate from God. The whole point of those passages is to associate the name 'Jesus' with that nameless divinity.

I can’t find one single passage to show that any New Testament author ever heard of Yahweh. They either never heard of him or else they were making a conscious/ deliberate effort to remove him from the OT.
Loomis is offline  
Old 03-25-2010, 01:47 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsgod View Post
Acts 12:7 Suddenly an angel of the Lord appeared and a light shone in the cell


Would that be an angel of the Lord God Almighty? One would think so. If so, could Paul be referring to James as the brother of the Lord God Almighty?
It looks vague and ambiguous to me. The story is fiction. Avoid reading more into it than what is actually there. It’s possible that the author didn’t know who his “angel of the Lord” was any more than you or I do. It’s possible that he was just mining/ barrowing expressions from the OT and didn’t really care who his angel was.

The "angel" character probably does not live outside of the context of the story.
Loomis is offline  
Old 03-25-2010, 02:38 PM   #14
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 104
Default

Thank you for your responses.

Does the Greek form of brother of the Lord allow for James to be a brother of the Lord God, or does it only allow for a literal brother? I've been told the latter only, but when I came across angel of the Lord I thought I'd ask.
dogsgod is offline  
Old 03-25-2010, 03:16 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsgod View Post
Thank you for your responses.

Does the Greek form of brother of the Lord allow for James to be a brother of the Lord God, or does it only allow for a literal brother?
That’s a false dilemma.

If you are genuinely interested in this subject then why have you rejected the possibility that it refers to a spiritual (non-literal) brother in faith to the Lord Jesus who, according to Acts 2:24, was a man raised from the dead by God?
Loomis is offline  
Old 03-25-2010, 03:26 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsgod View Post
Thank you for your responses.

Does the Greek form of brother of the Lord allow for James to be a brother of the Lord God, or does it only allow for a literal brother? I've been told the latter only, but when I came across angel of the Lord I thought I'd ask.
The Greek word translated brother in other contexts clearly means "fellow believer."
Toto is offline  
Old 03-25-2010, 04:16 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsgod View Post
Acts 12:7 Suddenly an angel of the Lord appeared and a light shone in the cell


Would that be an angel of the Lord God Almighty? One would think so. If so, could Paul be referring to James as the brother of the Lord God Almighty?

Well if there is one thing we can learn from religious people it is that we can make the bible mean anything we want it to mean. :devil1:

One question is that if paul meant God Almighty then why didnt he use the word for god that he used in surrounding verses?

1Paul, an apostle—sent not from men nor by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead— 2and all the brothers with me,


3Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, 4who gave himself for our sins to rescue us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father, 5to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.


6I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— 7which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. 8But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned! 9As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!
10Am I now trying to win the approval of men, or of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ.


11I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel I preached is not something that man made up. 12I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.
13For you have heard of my previous way of life in Judaism, how intensely I persecuted the church of God and tried to destroy it. 14I was advancing in Judaism beyond many Jews of my own age and was extremely zealous for the traditions of my fathers. 15But when God, who set me apart from birth and called me by his grace, was pleased 16to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not consult any man, 17nor did I go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went immediately into Arabia and later returned to Damascus.

18Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Peter and stayed with him fifteen days. 19I saw none of the other apostles—only James, the Lord's brother. 20I assure you before God that what I am writing you is no lie. 21Later I went to Syria and Cilicia. 22I was personally unknown to the churches of Judea that are in Christ. 23They only heard the report: "The man who formerly persecuted us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy." 24And they praised God because of me.

All the words in red are the greek word theos (or a variation).
Similar problems may present themselves for those arguing for it to be a literal brother.
judge is offline  
Old 03-25-2010, 04:17 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsgod View Post
Thank you for your responses.

Does the Greek form of brother of the Lord allow for James to be a brother of the Lord God, or does it only allow for a literal brother? I've been told the latter only, but when I came across angel of the Lord I thought I'd ask.
The Greek word translated brother in other contexts clearly means "fellow believer."
Are you sure? How many other contexts?
judge is offline  
Old 03-25-2010, 04:17 PM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loomis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsgod View Post
Thank you for your responses.

Does the Greek form of brother of the Lord allow for James to be a brother of the Lord God, or does it only allow for a literal brother?
That’s a false dilemma.

If you are genuinely interested in this subject then why have you rejected the possibility that it refers to a spiritual (non-literal) brother in faith to the Lord Jesus who, according to Acts 2:24, was a man raised from the dead by God?
I didn't mean to reject it. Does the Greek allow for a spiritual brother as it is worded?
dogsgod is offline  
Old 03-25-2010, 04:20 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Anything is possible. Paul often used the word, "Lord" (κυριου) in both senses, for both God and Jesus. And "angel of the Lord," uses the "God Almighty" interpretation, so Paul could have wrote of meeting James, the brother of God Almighty, in Jerusalem, whatever that may mean. Is that interpretation more probable or less probable than the interpretation that Paul wrote of meeting James, the brother of Jesus, in Jerusalem? The latter interpretation seems to have external evidence: a passage in Mark 6:3, a corresponding passage in the gospels, Matthew 13:55, and the writing of James' death in the writings of Josephus (some mythicists claim it is an interpolation, but if so it would still serve as evidence of early Christian belief). The former translation, though being accepted among mythicists, has considerably less evidence. It is limited to Paul's pattern of using the word "brother" in a religious metaphorical sense to refer to fellow Christians. It is not the same as "brother of the Lord"--the only other time Paul uses that phrase is in 1 Corinthians 9:5, where Paul categorizes "brothers of the Lord" as an elevated group of men but distinct from the apostles and Cephas.

.
Maybe "brothers of the Lord" in 1 Corinthians means literal brother?
What do you think?

How can we rule out that interpretation in 1 Corithinians 9:5
judge is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.