FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-21-2012, 07:22 PM   #21
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Endo View Post
Most Christians also think that the snake in the Garden of Eden is Satan, so he's basically responsible for getting the human race kicked out of paradise. Of course the Jews always thought the snake was just a snake, but no one bothered to ask them.

As a side note to my topic, . . .I find it rather odd that the fictional story of Adam and Eve has the god kicking them "out of paradise", . . . yet into an imperfect land, . . . also created by the same god.

Anyway, the Devil, Satan, or Lucifer wasn't really all that bad, when I did my search. The biblical god did FAR more violence and killed WAY more people.
Deavonreye is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 08:03 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowfox View Post
Isn't Lucifer Latin for light bringer?
Yes, lux is the noun for light, fero, ferre is the verb to bring. To offer is a derivative of this verb.
Seeing as no one else has thought to mention it, the HEBREW for 'Lucifer' is הילל (Read right to left)
funny enough, basically 'H-E-double Hockey Sticks!'
-or H-E-L-L for those who don't read Hebrew or get the drift.

Admittedly the addition of the Masoretic vowel points produce the pronunciation 'heylel' but were not inserted into the text until many centuries latter.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 02:55 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western Sweden
Posts: 3,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Seeing as no one else has thought to mention it, the HEBREW for 'Lucifer' is הילל
Another thing not yet mentioned is that in some Bibles, including the Vulgate and my Swedish versions, there is no mentioning of "Lucifer" at all. The "lightbringer" is translated as "the morning star". (Some versions mention heylāl "the crescent moon", but I think that alternative is mainly discarded.)
Lugubert is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 06:28 AM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

I always thought that lucifers were made from sulpher to provide a 'little light' so that people can 'see' when burning bible passages, that finally becomes an addiction to the smoke of burning sulpher that they call theology to make it legal as an addiction. Is that not what Rev.14:10-11 is all about?
Chili is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:58 AM   #25
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Southeastern U.S.
Posts: 202
Default

Wasn't "Lucifer" the king of Babylon's nickname at the time, and that's who they're talking about in that passage?
Tacita is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:18 PM   #26
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Correct

Lucifer

Quote:
Use of the name "Lucifer" for the Devil stems from applying to the Devil what Isaiah 14:3–20 says of a king of Babylon whom it calls Helel (הֵילֵל, Shining One), a Hebrew word that refers to the Day Star or Morning Star (the Latin term[2] for which is lucifer)[3] In 2 Peter 1:19 and elsewhere, the same Latin word lucifer is used to refer to the Morning Star, with no relation to the Devil. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus himself is called the Morning Star, but not "Lucifer", even in Latin.
Toto is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 07:11 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Correct

Lucifer

Quote:
Use of the name "Lucifer" for the Devil stems from applying to the Devil what Isaiah 14:3–20 says of a king of Babylon whom it calls Helel (הֵילֵל, Shining One), a Hebrew word that refers to the Day Star or Morning Star (the Latin term[2] for which is lucifer)[3] In 2 Peter 1:19 and elsewhere, the same Latin word lucifer is used to refer to the Morning Star, with no relation to the Devil. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus himself is called the Morning Star, but not "Lucifer", even in Latin.
Thank you Toto.
My view is that Jeebus represents a false and deceiving 'g-d' the anti-messiah, and is therefore even as admitted in Revelations, הילל 'Hell' and 'Lucifer', That great liar and deceiver of men, doomed to be cast into the fiery pit in The End of Days.
Do not take this statement overly literally. (I don't) It is simply a colorful poetical way of expressing that this creepy zombie Jeebus character will eventually be utterly vanquished and destroyed.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 09:00 PM   #28
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacita View Post
Wasn't "Lucifer" the king of Babylon's nickname at the time, and that's who they're talking about in that passage?
That makes sense as religion 'flashes images fo realty' but itself is not the light. But that is good too, because out of religion the Lamb of God must be born to liberate the Son of Man, and Jesus is the liberator but not the Son of Man, and so is the way but not the end.

So there is nothing wrong with Jesus, or with Lucifer as agents but not as ends. Lucifer is the nengative stand against which salvation must be found = faith seeking understanding by way of doubt = inner determination based on flashcards from religion.
Chili is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 10:36 AM   #29
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 425
Default

Some may find this helpful:

Satan / Devil / Lucifer
Dave31 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.