FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2007, 04:16 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: los angeles
Posts: 63
Thumbs down Islam and Black Slavery

Im sick of the black muslims and Arabs talking about the lack of racism in islam. the most absurd thing that i have ever heard in my life is that islalm is the Black mans religion. do this people not realise the 1500 slave trade that existed between arabia and africa. why would someone change from christianity to islam becasue thats the black mans religion. this claim is absurd to people who know that slavery was universal and that islam had as many slaves as christianity.


theres more from this article. which gives a biased account but is still usefull.


http://archive.salon.com/books/int/2...gal/index.html
naturalist is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 04:24 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

I'm sure slavery wasn't absent in Islamic history, but I'm fairly sure it was a lot less common than in Christian history.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 04:39 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 1,292
Default

The problem is the slave trade as based upon race is more of a Christian/American thing. Sure, slavery has "always" been around, but often times it was just a mix of what we call "races" it was Americans (noticeably Jefferson) who justified it by developing this concept of race (which we all know is just a social construct), to try to show that these people were deserving of slavery because of their race.

We need to remember not to confuse all slavery with racism, as often slavery wasnt based upon race.
nygreenguy is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 04:41 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Race is not a social construct.

CORRECTION EDIT: The races as they are divided may be and probably are at least somewhat defined arbitrarily, but genetic differences between groups of humans is undeniable. For example, people of purely African descent are certainly much different, both genetically and phenotypically, from those of Western European descent. I suppose the issue depends on how you define "race." So I think what NYGreenGuy said and what I initially said are both inaccurate.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 05:24 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 1,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatsoff View Post
Race is not a social construct.

CORRECTION EDIT: The races as they are divided may be and probably are at least somewhat defined arbitrarily, but genetic differences between groups of humans is undeniable. For example, people of purely African descent are certainly much different, both genetically and phenotypically, from those of Western European descent. I suppose the issue depends on how you define "race." So I think what NYGreenGuy said and what I initially said are both inaccurate.
I recently seen a documentary of PBS about just this. There was a segment in a classroom where several ethnically different students were going to take a DNA test. they were asked to picked who they thought they would be a closest math to. Obviously, the asian picked the asian, the black picked the black, and the white the white. Well, when the results came back, they were surprising because they were almost random in who they were most similar to.

This is a good quote:
Quote:
In fact, genetically, we are among the most similar of all species. Only one out of every thousand nucleotides that make up our genetic code is different, one individual from another. These look-alike penguins have twice the amount of genetic difference, one from the other, than humans. And these fruit flies? Ten times more difference. Any two fruit flies may be as different genetically from each other, as a human is from a chimpanzee. So the central question for us is: of the small amount of variation between us, what if any, is mapped along what we think of as racial lines?

Because we live in a racialized society, this is not an academic question. We have a long history of searching for racial differences and attributing performance and behavior to them. For two hundred years, scientists poked and prodded, measured and mapped the human body searching for a biological basis to race. Some measured facial angle to illustrate the proximity of races to the primitive. Others calibrated skull size to identify those with superior or inferior intelligence. Measures of eye shape, hair form, even brain color were scrutinized in the hunt for the fundamental sources of racial difference.
http://www.pbs.org/race/000_About/00...bout-01-01.htm

Quote:
RICHARD LEWONTIN: If you put it all together, and we've now got that for proteins, for blood groups, and now with DNA sequencing, we have it for DNA sequence differences, it always comes out the same. 85% of all the variation among human beings is between any two individuals within any local population. Between individuals within Sweden, or within the Chinese, or the Kikuyus, or the Icelanders.

NARRATOR: To put it another way, of the small amount of variation in our genes, there is apt to be as much difference between Gorgeous and her teammate Christine, as there is between Gorgeous and her opponent Kaylin. Any two individuals within any so-called race may be as different from each other as they are from any individual in another so-called race.
ibid.
nygreenguy is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 07:01 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 430
Default

I think what people forget is that slavery generally applies to those who can NOT meet certain criteria, whether they be physical, ethnic or otherwise arbitrary. Its not like just anyone was exempt

But this idea of "race" being Jeffersonian; I have never heard that. Did he just popularize a prevailing opinion or was it his? Curious.
Casper is offline  
Old 02-10-2007, 06:30 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 1,292
Default

His "Notes on Virginia" is what many have considered to really start it.

They were attempts to scientifically justify racism. Its really quite interesting and im still learning about it, so I really shouldnt say too much.
nygreenguy is offline  
Old 02-11-2007, 08:19 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: los angeles
Posts: 63
Default

arab slavery also had racism in it. the common word for blacks today is "abd" which means slave. The majority of the slaves in the middle east were black and the islamic world had more slaves transported to it then the new world. you have to also consider that many of them died in the sahara or during the journey through the athlantic ocean. Im not looking for who is worse, im just pointing out the absurdity of black converts yapping about how christianity is the slavery religion when the religion that they are converting to is just as bad. Im sick of hearing that islam was not racial, it did not have other muslims as slaves, who gives a shit, slavery is evil period. slavery became the moral question in the west but this was not much of an issue from non western socities where slavery was questioned. the west made the infriority of blacks the reason for whites owning them and this has lead to the evil bigotry of the west. islamic societies are just as equal in their contempt of blacks and never hide their beliefs. i dont think the author of the book knows what hes talking about when he says that being black was not a stigma.
naturalist is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 09:17 AM   #9
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

Arabs are pretty racist not just against blacks but against south asians. For that matter, blacks are sometimes racist against South Asians. And South Asians may be racist against blacks. They used to be racist against whites too, but then they were ruled by whites and that had to change.
premjan is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 09:27 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Is the article biased? I have Segal and I can't see a problem.

Islam is not a religion of peace and understanding.
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:49 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.