FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-04-2008, 08:19 PM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craigart14 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post

So do you think that heaven can be conceived to exist without hell?

Remember here that heaven was opened for the followers Jesus who are going to heaven (Jesuits we call them) and thus not for Christians.
Jesus could easily have said that his followers were going to heaven and everybody else was going to sleep. No need for eternal torment.

Craig
But Craig, eternity exist between the first and second death and that is where heaven and hell are.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-04-2008, 08:57 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,962
Default

Why are you guys even trying to understand Chili? It's been mathematically proven to be impossible.
makerowner is offline  
Old 07-04-2008, 10:36 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by makerowner View Post
Why are you guys even trying to understand Chili? It's been mathematically proven to be impossible.
Just telling Craig that 40 years of purification is equal to hell on earth if only 40 months are needed = purgation (Purgatory) for 40 years to be in flames for 40 years and die nontheless. That's go to be hell, I would say.

Notice that only in Matthew Jesus returned to Galilee instead of going on to Isreal. This means that resurrection did not follow in Matthew and to hell he went except that the Jews did not recognize it as hell because heaven was not known to them as of yet.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-04-2008, 11:08 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by elevator View Post
I have no idea what you are trying to say. Please enlighten me as to the difference between "Lord God" and "God" in a biblical context.
God is first cause and Lord God is second cause and therefore each one is exhausted by their function as first and second cause.

If you ever read Genesis the above must have been very obvious to you.
Chili, nothing you write is obvious to anybody (and I've read Genesis several times).
Joan of Bark is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 05:16 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post

God is first cause and Lord God is second cause and therefore each one is exhausted by their function as first and second cause.

If you ever read Genesis the above must have been very obvious to you.
Chili, nothing you write is obvious to anybody (and I've read Genesis several times).
But in Gen.1 "God said" (not Lord God) and the essence of creation was called into existence while nothing was formed yet.

Then in Gen.2 Lord God formed that which was created in Gen.1 and created nothing of his own but only formed that which was to be.

Then in Gen.3 'like god' was created inside the imagination of man now with a mind of his own wherein man became co-creator with God except that nothing that he created ever took form but remained an illusion instead.

The obvious here is that God did not create Adam and Eve but created man and woman and it is man who created the Adam image of man that is made known in the "who told you that you were naked" (cf. Gen.2:25). It is this Adam image only that was banned from Eden while man and woman remained in Eden as the naked animal man . . . which then is the condition to which we must return to enter Eden and have paradise on earth.

It is about this total abandonment that the Gosples are about which should take 40 months instead of 40 years. To achieve this we must be reborn of the Gen.1 God (obviously) and not the 'like god' of Gen.3 (carnals desire etc.) as John 1:13 tells us.

Always remember here that essence precedes existence as the Ideal after which the mold is made wherein dust is formed.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 05:21 AM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post

God is first cause and Lord God is second cause and therefore each one is exhausted by their function as first and second cause.

If you ever read Genesis the above must have been very obvious to you.
Chili, nothing you write is obvious to anybody (and I've read Genesis several times).
A good beginning here is to abandon the idea that the Gospels are synoptic.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 10:52 AM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storytime View Post
Well, Christians always say people cannot keep the laws and all people are siners. However, Jesus said those who didn't keep the laws could not be his disciples. Christians then turn to "grace" as excusing their sin but then Jesus said once people were made aware of their sins then they had no more excuse (go and sin no more). So it seems that ignorance is one thing under grace where no punishment is applied and forgiveness mandated, as compared to intentional sin where judgment applies to the specific offense. At least that's the way I'm understanding Jesus and his Judaism.
Not even good to keep the law if the cross of eternal salvation is for sinners only. Moses wrote the law not to stop the orgy but to convict sinners so that salvation could come their way.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.