FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2008, 03:33 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so, through Jesus, God will bring with him those who have died.” 1 Thessalonians 4:14.

Why did Paul not write that the knew that Jesus died and rose again?

Why is the alleged fact of the resurrection of Jesus a belief rather than an accepted fact among early Christians?
It is worth noting that Paul says "we believe" not "I believe". Paul might have said that he himself knew of the resurrection from direct personal experience. However, the Thessalonians were not in the same position, having believed in the resurrection on the basis of Paul's preaching.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 03-04-2008, 09:20 PM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: On a big island.
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post

It is worth noting that Paul says "we believe" not "I believe". Paul might have said that he himself knew of the resurrection from direct personal experience. However, the Thessalonians were not in the same position, having believed in the resurrection on the basis of Paul's preaching.

Andrew Criddle

True, but the 1st person plural is consistent with what he says in Galatians 1:11-12:

Quote:
For I would have you know, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man. For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ.
In other words, not even Paul himself knew of any of this from personal experience (unless you count revelation as personal experience).

However, if Paul thought the resurrection was, in fact, historical, then he wouldn't say "believe", but "know" - even if he had no personal experience of the event. What author would write that he "believed" Alexander conquered Asia, or that he "believed" Caesar defeated Pompey?
karlmarx is offline  
Old 03-04-2008, 09:38 PM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by karlmarx View Post
What author would write that he "believed" Alexander conquered Asia, or that he "believed" Caesar defeated Pompey?
...I might, but then, I'm somewhat of an uberskeptic in these regards.

I doubt Paul was as critical.
spamandham is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:25 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.