FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2007, 07:49 AM   #31
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
I have personally heard sermons or Sunday School lessons in which the preacher or teacher asserts that Jesus, as a human being, must not have been very good-looking.

. . . he was counted among the wicked because the cross of eternal salvation is for sinners only! Or did you perhaps think that they want cowards in heaven?

So why do you think we have confessionals if not to encourage the courages sinner.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-16-2007, 08:01 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post

Paul says that Jesus was born of a woman, of the seed of Abraham, of the seed of David. On their surface, these are claims that Jesus was a human being. I am looking for evidence that Paul meant something else.
Yes but "born of a woman" is not the same born of a female because the woman in this context is not human = not hu-man = not-earthly = free from sin = virgin in perpetuity or it could not be the seed of Abraham of David who's seed was also from God, period.

Paul is looking at the archetype of redemption wherein the image of God that exists in each one of us is brought back to life. They call it heaven on earth, Ben, which makes Jesus a real man who walked on both the old and the new earth.

Woman is opposite to human but this would be philosophy and a derail in theology.
Where does Paul say that the woman was a virgin in perpetuity?
ynquirer is offline  
Old 07-16-2007, 08:05 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post
I just don't see that these details, other than their being referenced as part of the revelation, have any bearing on what was preached.
Do you see that these details appear to indicate that "Paul thought that Jesus was a Jew and a descendant of David"?

Regarding Paul's source(s), do you think it reasonable that he would persecute this group he later joined without knowing anything about their beliefs?
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 07-16-2007, 08:18 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post
I just don't see that these details, other than their being referenced as part of the revelation, have any bearing on what was preached.
Do you see that these details appear to indicate that "Paul thought that Jesus was a Jew and a descendant of David"?
I think that is what the scriptures revealed to Paul...

Quote:
Regarding Paul's source(s), do you think it reasonable that he would persecute this group he later joined without knowing anything about their beliefs?
Since the writer of these epistles probably invented the religion, who exactly was he persecuting again?
dog-on is offline  
Old 07-16-2007, 11:02 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
Quote:
Among the Mediterranean peoples, which people known to have been historical figures were worshipped as gods?
I am not quite certain what this has to do with the thread, but, according to Charles Talbert, in chapter 2 of What is a Gospel? (or via: amazon.co.uk), we have Alexander, Augustus, Empedocles, Apollonius, Claudius, and Peregrinus, at least.

Ben.
Also Antinous, the boyfriend of the Emperor Hadrian, who died under mysterious circumstances.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 07-16-2007, 01:14 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post

Do you see that these details appear to indicate that "Paul thought that Jesus was a Jew and a descendant of David"?
I think that is what the scriptures revealed to Paul...
You're stuck on the source when Ben's point is the apparent meaning of what Paul writes about Jesus regardless of the assumed source.

So, do you see that these details appear to indicate that "Paul thought that Jesus was a Jew and a descendant of David"?

Quote:
Since the writer of these epistles probably invented the religion, who exactly was he persecuting again?
Paul tells us he persecuted the "assembly of God"(YLT) before becoming an apostle after several others. He is arguably the originator of what came to be its own religion but he clearly joined an existing belief system to do so.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 07-16-2007, 02:37 PM   #37
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Ben, I think the dearth of pertinent responses to your challenge makes your point, nor do I expect any citations that meet the requirements you challenged the mythicists to set forth.

The reason is twofold:

First, there simply are very few primary source texts with mystery religion content. Mystery religions are reconstructions, derived mostly from archeological guesses and post-Christian authors commenting on pagan religions.

Second, I think you're correct in your apparent conclusion that there are no obvious examples of mythic figures in classical paganism that fit the bill (i.e, that engaged in divine other wordly conduct refered to in terms of a terrestial biography).

Having said that, I think the closest candidate to your challenge is probably from the Havamal ("Words of the High One," a late Old Norse text), where Odin obtains wisdom by hanging on the world tree Yggdrasil in some sort of self-sacrifice ritual. The text clearly passed through the hands of Christian clerics so it's difficult to determine what is authentic Old Norse shamanism, and what is Christian interpolation designed to bring Othin into the iconography of Christianity (something Germanic clerics were keen to do). In any case, Odin is represented as functioning in some other divine dimension, but he also gets imported into history, running around and having affairs and such: it's hard to tell exactly when or if he's in history or in Asgaard and whether his conduct is symbolic/ritualistic or just plain narrative.

That isn't exactly what you're looking for, but it's probably the best the mythicists can do (and ironically of course I'm an historicist).

(btw, I may be conflating the Havamal with the Elder Edda -- another late ON text that is also subject to profound Christian redaction -- I haven't read them in a while, but the ambiguous treatment of Odin is present in both).
Gamera is offline  
Old 07-16-2007, 03:53 PM   #38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
Default

I don't know why this idea of various levels of reality strikes the people on here as so strange and unprecedented since PAUL HIMSELF in his own writing seems to indicate that he actually went there.

Apparently, this was a very common belief in Judaism, as evidenced by this site:

http://www.ucalgary.ca/~elsegal/Shok...th_Heaven.html
Roland is offline  
Old 07-16-2007, 04:26 PM   #39
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ynquirer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post

Yes but "born of a woman" is not the same born of a female because the woman in this context is not human = not hu-man = not-earthly = free from sin = virgin in perpetuity or it could not be the seed of Abraham of David who's seed was also from God, period.

Paul is looking at the archetype of redemption wherein the image of God that exists in each one of us is brought back to life. They call it heaven on earth, Ben, which makes Jesus a real man who walked on both the old and the new earth.

Woman is opposite to human but this would be philosophy and a derail in theology.
Where does Paul say that the woman was a virgin in perpetuity?
If he doesn't he should have, or at least could have because it cannot be any other way. It has been that way throughout the ages and will always be that way or Mary could not be co-redemptrix.

Sorry for throwing that in but Eden is preserved by the woman (here called Mary) while we are outsiders and only a rebirth that is incipient from upon high will allow us back in. For this to happen the perpetual virginity of Mary is a necessary condition to make 'upon high' known.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-16-2007, 08:53 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ynquirer View Post
Where does Paul say that the woman was a virgin in perpetuity?
If he doesn't he should have....
That ought to come in handy in future debates.

Opponent: Where does Paul say that?
Ben: Not sure he does, but he should have.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.