FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-22-2009, 08:22 AM   #141
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North West usa
Posts: 10,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petergdi View Post
I know enough about language to know that very little communication is or can be strictly "literal." You are a linguist, so you should know this too.
A simple rule: one needs to deal with the literal meaning of a text before one can do anything else. If you think that meaning is not the intended meaning of the writer, there must be evidence in the communication or context.

Hating your mother and father is a way of disowning the fleshly limitations you were born into and need to put aside. But what would make one think that "hate" was not the desired feeling in Luke?


spin
I am curious, do you think the writings that encompass the purported words of Jesus ever contained what might be called hyperbole, just to make a point; even if it is obscure at times? Or do you perhaps think the intent of Matt 18:9 was to have many one eyed, one armed, Christians?

How does Luke's 14:26 relate to Matt 10:37? What of Paul's writings like Eph 6:1 and 1 Tim 5:4-8 regarding ones family?

What of his other (purported) statements relative to parents/family, such as the below? Do we just take this character to be fully schizophrenic, and conclude that all the writings are simply incoherent?
John 8:49 Jesus answered, "I am not possessed; I honor my Father, but you dishonor me.
Mark 7:9 He went on to say, "How well you have set aside the commandment of God in order to uphold your tradition! 10 For Moses said, 'Honor your father and your mother,' and 'Whoever curses father or mother shall die. 11 Yet you say, 'If a person says to father or mother, "Any support you might have had from me is qorban"' (meaning, dedicated to God), 12 you allow him to do nothing more for his father or mother. 13 You nullify the word of God in favor of your tradition that you have handed on. And you do many such things."

I will say that Luke 9:59-62 is troubling, in that one would think a god could figure out that mere humans need to bury their loved ones. Matt 10:34-37 is also kind of weird, but then I don't really consider Christianity a religion of peace and haromony. The NT has many real issues, and it seems to me that this borders on...well...nitpicking.

PS None of this absolves IBIH from needing to back up his vacuous claim that Jesus was speaking in Hebrew in the verses in Luke.
funinspace is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 08:26 AM   #142
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 814
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark View Post
Hymn, if the original word really means to love less, why don't the Biblical translators use that term in English bibles, thereby avoiding this confusion? Biblical translators are Christians, after all, and you'd think they'd want to avoid any incorrect interpretations.
Because modern copyists are not going to change the words in the bible, so uneducated people can understand it better. When I read 'we must hate our parents', I don't see literal emotional hatred. I see "we must love God more than our parents".


Quote:
But as I said before ...

All these problems we have with Biblical translation and interpretation could have been avoided if the all-wise God had simply transmitted His 'word' directly into our brains.
Why would he do that? Christians outweigh atheists by a few billion people. We understand what it means.. what's your excuse? Because I think atheists really want the bible to say 'HATE YOUR PARENTS!' because they think it proves Jesus was insane, and full of hate.
IBelieveInHymn is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 08:38 AM   #143
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBelieveInHymn View Post
Christians outweigh atheists by a few billion people. We understand what it means.. what's your excuse? Because I think atheists really want the bible to say 'HATE YOUR PARENTS!' because they think it proves Jesus was insane, and full of hate.
Uh huh. And how exactly do we harmonize the Jesus of the Sermon on the Mount with the avenger Christ in Revelation, dishing out mayhem to unbelievers? Or what about the anti-Semitic remarks in the gospels, is this from a Jew who loves his own people, or a sock-puppet spouting gentile racism?
bacht is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 08:51 AM   #144
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
Do we just take this character to be fully schizophrenic, and conclude that all the writings are simply incoherent?
Considering that the Jesus stories have multiple authors with multiple agendas, yes.
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 09:01 AM   #145
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: land of the home, free of the brave
Posts: 9,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBelieveInHymn View Post
Why would he do that? Christians outweigh atheists by a few billion people. We understand what it means.. what's your excuse? Because I think atheists really want the bible to say 'HATE YOUR PARENTS!' because they think it proves Jesus was insane, and full of hate.
Because a billion people can't possibly be wrong...
credoconsolans is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 09:11 AM   #146
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
A simple rule: one needs to deal with the literal meaning of a text before one can do anything else. If you think that meaning is not the intended meaning of the writer, there must be evidence in the communication or context.

Hating your mother and father is a way of disowning the fleshly limitations you were born into and need to put aside. But what would make one think that "hate" was not the desired feeling in Luke?
I am curious, do you think the writings that encompass the purported words of Jesus ever contained what might be called hyperbole, just to make a point; even if it is obscure at times? Or do you perhaps think the intent of Matt 18:9 was to have many one eyed, one armed, Christians?
The rule I gave is fairly straightforward, my thoughts about possible hyperbole notwithstanding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
How does Luke's 14:26 relate to Matt 10:37? What of Paul's writings like Eph 6:1 and 1 Tim 5:4-8 regarding ones family?

What of his other (purported) statements relative to parents/family, such as the below? Do we just take this character to be fully schizophrenic, and conclude that all the writings are simply incoherent?
John 8:49 Jesus answered, "I am not possessed; I honor my Father, but you dishonor me.
Mark 7:9 He went on to say, "How well you have set aside the commandment of God in order to uphold your tradition! 10 For Moses said, 'Honor your father and your mother,' and 'Whoever curses father or mother shall die. 11 Yet you say, 'If a person says to father or mother, "Any support you might have had from me is qorban"' (meaning, dedicated to God), 12 you allow him to do nothing more for his father or mother. 13 You nullify the word of God in favor of your tradition that you have handed on. And you do many such things."
Is there any rule that requires a tradition to be coherent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
I will say that Luke 9:59-62 is troubling, in that one would think a god could figure out that mere humans need to bury their loved ones. Matt 10:34-37 is also kind of weird, but then I don't really consider Christianity a religion of peace and haromony. The NT has many real issues, and it seems to me that this borders on...well...nitpicking.
But is there anything wrong with a little healthy nitpicking?

Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
PS None of this absolves IBIH from needing to back up his vacuous claim that Jesus was speaking in Hebrew in the verses in Luke.
Do you expect to see either support for the notion or a recantation?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 09:14 AM   #147
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Collingswood, NJ
Posts: 1,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBelieveInHymn View Post
Why would he do that? Christians outweigh atheists by a few billion people. We understand what it means.. what's your excuse? Because I think atheists really want the bible to say 'HATE YOUR PARENTS!' because they think it proves Jesus was insane, and full of hate.
I would bet that, if you gave a survey with the following options:

a. "If anyone comes to Me, and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be My disciple." (Luke 14:26 NASB)
b. "From each shall be taken according to his means, and to each shall be given according to his needs." (adapted from Communist Manifesto)

And asked Christians which one Jesus said, you would either get a majority or a strong minority for answer b. The large majority of Christians are Biblically illiterate, and I would wager don't know that Jesus said this. Of those who do know, in my experience they either gloss over it (as they do with much of the hateful and contradictory material in the NT), preferring the shinier and happier stuff, or they learn an apologetic to dance around the topic like you've demonstrated here.
graymouser is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 09:15 AM   #148
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBelieveInHymn View Post

Why would he do that? Christians outweigh atheists by a few billion people. We understand what it means.. what's your excuse? Because I think atheists really want the bible to say 'HATE YOUR PARENTS!' because they think it proves Jesus was insane, and full of hate.
There is no need for you to reinterpret it as less than hate. He's asking you to sacrifice your life. That's not something someone does if they care for the feelings of their family and friends. The point isn't that you need to hate your parents, just that what he is asking his followers to do is going to cause pain to their loved ones and that should considered before trying to take up your cross.
Elijah is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 09:17 AM   #149
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 814
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graymouser View Post
I would bet that, if you gave a survey with the following options:

a. "If anyone comes to Me, and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be My disciple." (Luke 14:26 NASB)
b. "From each shall be taken according to his means, and to each shall be given according to his needs." (adapted from Communist Manifesto)

And asked Christians which one Jesus said, you would either get a majority or a strong minority for answer b. The large majority of Christians are Biblically illiterate, and I would wager don't know that Jesus said this. Of those who do know, in my experience they either gloss over it (as they do with much of the hateful and contradictory material in the NT), preferring the shinier and happier stuff, or they learn an apologetic to dance around the topic like you've demonstrated here.
If you did that survery, and these "supposed" Christians didn't know which one Jesus said, Then I would think they need to brush up on their Biblical studies. However, that doesn't mean Jesus won't save them. Just because people are illierate to the bible, maybe God will accept them? I don't know that for sure, do you?

I believe the Bible does say mentally challenged people are automatically rewared a crown of life.
IBelieveInHymn is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 09:23 AM   #150
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North West usa
Posts: 10,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
I am curious, do you think the writings that encompass the purported words of Jesus ever contained what might be called hyperbole, just to make a point; even if it is obscure at times? Or do you perhaps think the intent of Matt 18:9 was to have many one eyed, one armed, Christians?
The rule I gave is fairly straightforward, my thoughts about possible hyperbole notwithstanding.
And would it pain you to share your thoughts on possible hyperbole?

Quote:
Is there any rule that requires a tradition to be coherent?
Nope, but if there is no coherency what so ever, then is there even a point to putting more than a passing thought into the topic? Maybe one should start deconstructing Marvel comics next...

Quote:
But is there anything wrong with a little healthy nitpicking?
No, but balance is also often a good thing...

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
PS None of this absolves IBIH from needing to back up his vacuous claim that Jesus was speaking in Hebrew in the verses in Luke.
Do you expect to see either support for the notion or a recantation?


spin
Sadly, no I don't expect to see either, the dodge pattern has already become blatent...
funinspace is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.