FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-18-2004, 06:00 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

I just proposed over at CF that we should get rid of Paul's (Peter will be next - harder time to convince Catholics, and Chili ) letters. I expect turmoil to ensue.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 06:03 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Scholar
Their economy relied heavily on slavery. There was no option of total emancipation.
No? Why not? I believe the south said the same thing in 1860.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 06:05 PM   #23
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MortalWombat
Poverty was a situation that poor people couldn't avoid either, but that didn't stop Jesus from telling rich people to sell all they have and give to the poor on several occasions. Surely he could have slipped in a "...and free your slaves while you're at it." Presumably selling all you had would include selling any slaves you had, if you had them.
don't let Jesus completely off the hook. He also rebuked his disciples when Mary Magdalen was "wasting" perfume on his feet. When the disciples would have sold the fragrance to feed the poor, Jesus basically said that there would always be poor. He's right though. And my taxes are keeping them poor.
Johnny Scholar is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 06:15 PM   #24
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cweb255
I just proposed over at CF ...
What's CF?
Johnny Scholar is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 06:30 PM   #25
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Chili, the purpose of BC&H is to discuss Biblical Criticism and History. Theological interpretation, where not directly relevant to one of those two topics, belongs in General Religious Discussions.
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 07:48 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 5,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Scholar
However, now I am repulsed when I read it, and troubled when I prepare an outline to teach it.
I know this is off topic, but if the subject matter repulses you, why teach it? Presumably you're still some sort of Christian.
PoodleLovinPessimist is offline  
Old 11-18-2004, 10:44 PM   #27
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PoodleLovinPessimist
I know this is off topic, but if the subject matter repulses you, why teach it? Presumably you're still some sort of Christian.
Um, well, hehe, thats a tough one. The short story is that I'm deconverting. The long story is that I'm an enigma. the longer story is here.
Johnny Scholar is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 06:11 AM   #28
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
Chili, the purpose of BC&H is to discuss Biblical Criticism and History. Theological interpretation, where not directly relevant to one of those two topics, belongs in General Religious Discussions.
I understand but in Galations 5:1-4 religious observation is called slavery and sin an illusion, and churches an abomination for those who have been set free in Christ. This would include each and every Christian, as the Galations were, wherefore we can be "free in prison" and this annihilates the entire negative connotation we attach to physical slavery. Happy is the man who through the submission of his ego identity doesn't become an selfrighteous egotist who will never see the end of his tunnel.

Edited to add . . . as self proclaimed Christian or self proclaimed atheist.

Both theism and atheism are just egocentric positions wherein only the light has changed within the tunnel.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 09:16 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cweb255
No? Why not? I believe the south said the same thing in 1860.
Slavery in the South of the USA in 1860 was 'the peculiar institution' an anomaly in a largely capitalist society based around the exploitation of wage labour.

Inventing modern capitalism was probably not an option for the Roman Empire.

(Slavery was in subsequent centuries largely replaced by early forms of feudalism and serfdom on the one hand and wage labour by workers with very limited civil rights on the other. This did involve a modest improvement in working confditions. Whether Christianity was involved in any way in the replacement of slavery by serfdom is disputed but the answer is probably no. )

The early church did make attempts to improve the treatment of slaves but the effects were probably limited.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:59 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
Slavery in the South of the USA in 1860 was 'the peculiar institution' an anomaly in a largely capitalist society based around the exploitation of wage labour.

Inventing modern capitalism was probably not an option for the Roman Empire.

(Slavery was in subsequent centuries largely replaced by early forms of feudalism and serfdom on the one hand and wage labour by workers with very limited civil rights on the other. This did involve a modest improvement in working confditions. Whether Christianity was involved in any way in the replacement of slavery by serfdom is disputed but the answer is probably no. )

The early church did make attempts to improve the treatment of slaves but the effects were probably limited.

Andrew Criddle
Slavery is the institute of the rich. From what I remember about the Bible, Jesus wasn't a capitalist. Thus, even though the Roman Empire wouldn't have had to speak out against it, it would not be apropos for the Apostles to condone it.
Chris Weimer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.