FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2013, 08:48 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default Chili post and reply split from smoking gun for mythicism

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
[
So, in the same words, Jesus was born of a woman and born under the law in order to redeem others who were under the law--that is: Jews.
"Born of woman" is not the same as "born of a woman" in that 'a woman' is female that Mary was/is not.

"Born under the law" is [from] under the conviction of sin wherein the concept sin now as inner conviction has passified the Adamic nature in us to a point that woman can lead us as if by the nose into seclusion, and there give birth to the inner child by way of rebirth to renew our mind and go back to Eden again on our own.
Chili is offline  
Old 05-30-2013, 08:52 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
[
So, in the same words, Jesus was born of a woman and born under the law in order to redeem others who were under the law--that is: Jews.
"Born of woman" is not the same as "born of a woman" in that 'a woman' is female that Mary was/is not.

"Born under the law" is [from] under the conviction of sin wherein the concept sin now as inner conviction has passified the Adamic nature in us to a point that woman can lead us as if by the nose into seclusion, and there give birth to the inner child by way of rebirth to renew our mind and go back to Eden again on our own.
http://pageofmystery.com/lifeboat/My...0-%20Theme.mp3
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 05-30-2013, 09:03 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

Stalking and posting links without an explanation are both very bad and unintelligent manners
Iskander is offline  
Old 05-30-2013, 10:22 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
Stalking and posting links without an explanation are both very bad and unintelligent manners
I should have thought that the meaning and message of the link was self explanatory, if not self evident. And I didn't know that manners were rated on an intelligence scale. Good and bad, yes. Do they have IQs?

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 05-30-2013, 10:56 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

<removed>
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 05-30-2013, 11:09 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

<removed>
Iskander is offline  
Old 05-30-2013, 11:13 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

<removed>
Sheshbazzar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:25 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.