FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.

Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Biblical Criticism - 2001
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-10-2001, 06:00 AM   #11
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829

The Romance languages I mentioned because they have a well-documented ancestor, which makes them a good introduction to linguistic evolution; the other examples, Indo-European, Semitic, and Nostratic, have no documented ancestors.

As to Semitic pronouns, I once tracked down Hebrew, Arabic, and Akkadian ones, and they turned out to look very similar -- and unlike Indo-European ones, which likewise looked fairly similar.

It might be interesting to display some of these comparisons; anyone interested?

[ December 10, 2001: Message edited by: lpetrich ]</p>
lpetrich is offline  
Old 12-10-2001, 01:08 PM   #12
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Takaliapa, KR
Posts: 188

I didn't think that there would be creationists dull enough to dispute linguistic evolution out there. It's like evolution but with "kinds" pre-defined for them.
Heleilu is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:15 PM.


This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.