FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Biblical Criticism - 2001
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-15-2001, 06:28 PM   #21
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post


Both sides in this discussion are like Peter Bly, the character of whom Wordsworth sang:

a primrose by the river's brim
A yellow primrose was to him;
And it was nothing more.
[/b][/QUOTE]

. . . or


Earth is crammed with heaven,
and every bush is a burning bush.
those who see will take off their shoes,
the rest just sit around and pick berries.

Elizabeth Barret Browing
(sorry, somewhat paraphrased).


[This message has been edited by Amos123 (edited May 15, 2001).]
 
Old 05-15-2001, 06:53 PM   #22
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

So, Amos123, are you claiming that those miracles are literal history?

And if they are literal history, then are the miracles of other religions literal history? Is Alexander the Great one of Zeus's offspring? Did Apollonius of Tyana raise a girl from the dead? Did the Gods intervene in the war over Troy? Did the Buddha get up and walk right after he was born? Is "there is no god but Allah" written in Arabic inside some tomato?
 
Old 05-15-2001, 07:10 PM   #23
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Overland Park, KS USA
Posts: 335
Question

The point is simple.

If we say we discard the "wildly mythological" and use common sense in interpreting the gospels as Bede advocates, then yes you must throw out the resurrection as it IS WILDLY, if not the MOST WILDLY assertion of the whole tale. Skies darkening...happens. Earthquakes, ditto. Dead men walking...there's a reach.

You can't have it both ways here. Either Matthew is clearly lying about the events surrounding the resurrection (which begs the question about what else is a lie?) OR they're all a true historical account.

The records come down on the lying side as we can't seem to find a record of either the earthquake or the sky darkening.

Or is this just another sad example of Christian cut&paste bibling? :;
Lance is offline  
Old 05-15-2001, 09:34 PM   #24
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Lance:
The point is simple... You can't have it both ways here. Either Matthew is clearly lying about the events surrounding the resurrection (which begs the question about what else is a lie?) OR they're all a true historical account.</font>
"Either/Or" thinking says more about the bifurcation of consciousness than it does about any bifurcation inherent in reality.

The gospels are a complex blend of history and theology. It's not that the evangelists wrote dumb stories and at the Enlightenment we got smart and realized it; it's that they wrote powerful, metaphoric stories and we got dumb at the Enlightenment and took them literally!

Amos123:
To paraphrase and extend Elizabeth Barrett Browning, if every bush is flaming and, by extension, if every grave is opened and every curtain between the divine and the human rips in two--what does that tell us about the meaning of Jesus' crucifixion to gospel writers in the first century?

And by the way, Ipetrich, parable is NOT allegory. Allegory explains and, at best, "decodes." The parable subverts.



[This message has been edited by aikido7 (edited May 15, 2001).]
 
Old 05-16-2001, 06:06 AM   #25
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Overland Park, KS USA
Posts: 335
Post

Akido7: What's happened is Bede's inadvertently painted you guys into a horrid corner.

If you hold a literalist position, you can be torn apart on inconsistancies, factual foul-ups, and down right lies that are found in the bible.

If you hold an interpretive position such as Bede and more liberal Christians, you've just shown us all how two-faced it is. You are selectively picking and chosing what you WANT to believe and there's no objective rationale about it. Its entirely subjective. On one hand you say to discard Matthew's lies and hyperbole for the mythical nonsense it is...but at the same time declare with all sincerity that the resurrection happened.

How on earth can you do that when you call dead men walking mythical and a dead man walking out of grave two days later NOT mythical?

Catch-22's a bitch, ain't it???
Lance is offline  
Old 05-16-2001, 05:45 PM   #26
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Lance:
Akido7: What's happened is Bede's inadvertently painted you guys into a horrid corner.

If you hold a literalist position, you can be torn apart on inconsistancies, factual foul-ups, and down right lies that are found in the bible.

If you hold an interpretive position such as Bede and more liberal Christians, you've just shown us all how two-faced it is.
</font>
Only a mirror has two faces; the gospel accounts are history, fact, theology and myth. And I am using myth as anthropologists use the term. Specifically, I am not looking at the gospel accounts as the surface stories for themselves or even for the characters and events in the stories. A study of myth in this instance looks for the underlying structure at the deepest possible level. Levi Strauss's article of 1955 called "The Structural Study of Myth" might be worth reading in this regard.

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2"> You are selectively picking and chosing what you WANT to believe and there's no objective rationale about it. Its entirely subjective.</font>
This idea poisons all wells. While post-modern criticism must admit that the act of observation changes what is observed, we are all then literally standing on no ground at all if "everthing" is to be dismissively declared "entirely subjective."

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">...you say to discard Matthew's lies and hyperbole for the mythical nonsense it is...but at the same time declare with all sincerity that the resurrection happened. </font>
When we in the 21st century can stop pouring our ideas of fantasy back into the first century we might be able to make a little progress in the debate--or at least sharpen the questions somewhat.

The resurrection happened. To me that is a historical and mystical fact. It had nothing to do with Jesus' body. The gospel writers expressed the meaning of his crucifixion in metaphorical language and narrative. Deep and complex imagery was used from Israel's cultural mythology at that time. The task of scholarship is to attempt to unravel that dense overlay. The gospels are not CNN biographies. They do not simply report the history of Jesus: they metaphorize it. They turn his words and deeds into parable.

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2"> How on earth can you do that when you call dead men walking mythical and a dead man walking out of grave two days later NOT mythical? </font>
I don't do that and I did not do that.

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2"> Catch-22's a bitch, ain't it??? </font>
Catch 22's are always a bitch. They are part and parcel of the human dilemma and always cry out for some sort of resolution. The easiest resolution lies in reframing the "Catch 22s" as "both/and" rather than "either/or." Sometimes this reframing comes from conscious planning and other times from an unconscious epiphany.




[This message has been edited by aikido7 (edited May 16, 2001).]
 
Old 05-16-2001, 10:07 PM   #27
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Bede:
There was a lunar eclipse on Friday 7th April, 33AD. This is one of the dates that Jesus could have been crucified.
Bede
</font>
Could a lunar eclipse cause darkness?

 
Old 05-16-2001, 10:28 PM   #28
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by lpetrich:
So, Amos123, are you claiming that those miracles are literal history?

And if they are literal history, then are the miracles of other religions literal history? Is Alexander the Great one of Zeus's offspring? Did Apollonius of Tyana raise a girl from the dead? Did the Gods intervene in the war over Troy? Did the Buddha get up and walk right after he was born? Is "there is no god but Allah" written in Arabic inside some tomato?
</font>
They are not just historical accounts but allegorical descriptions of current events. The history of the account is secondary to the event and is only used here to create a new religion in an old mythology.

Amos
 
Old 05-16-2001, 10:28 PM   #29
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Certainly not darkness in the middle of the day!
 
Old 05-16-2001, 10:45 PM   #30
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by aikido7:
"Either/Or" thinking says more about the bifurcation of consciousness than it does about any bifurcation inherent in reality.

The gospels are a complex blend of history and theology. It's not that the evangelists wrote dumb stories and at the Enlightenment we got smart and realized it; it's that they wrote powerful, metaphoric stories and we got dumb at the Enlightenment and took them literally!

Amos123:
To paraphrase and extend Elizabeth Barrett Browning, if every bush is flaming and, by extension, if every grave is opened and every curtain between the divine and the human rips in two--what does that tell us about the meaning of Jesus' crucifixion to gospel writers in the first century?

And by the way, Ipetrich, parable is NOT allegory. Allegory explains and, at best, "decodes." The parable subverts.

[This message has been edited by aikido7 (edited May 15, 2001).]
</font>
Every bush is flaming but only those who see this will take off their shoes in reverence of heaven on earth. The rest just sit around and pick berries from the same bush while in total oblivion of heavn on earth. Obviously their veil has not been rent nor has their grave been opened.

I love your line "It's not that the evangelists wrote dumb stories and at the Enlightenment we got smart and realized it; it's that they wrote powerful, metaphoric stories and we got dumb at the Enlightenment and took them literally!" but, is an educated man like you allowed to say this?

Amos
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.