FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Biblical Criticism - 2001
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-27-2001, 01:12 PM   #21
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Ish:
hezekiahjones, I've seen your posts and thought you knew better than this.</font>
Good lord! Are you telling me the KJV is something other than inviolate? (Please don't let this get around.)
 
Old 03-27-2001, 01:21 PM   #22
Ulrich
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: St Louis Metro East
Posts: 1,046
Post

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Ish:
hezekiahjones, I've seen your posts and thought you knew better than this.

The best MSS do not have the verses in Mark that you mentioned. They end at Mark 16:8. As a matter of fact the verses beyond Mark 16:8 seem to be strongly non-Markan (see Bruce Metzger's Textual Commentary on the GNT).

Ish
</font>
And which versions of the Bible have been honest enough to edit this little forgery out? Which publishers have plans to edit future versions of their texts to incorporate this knowledge?
Ulrich is offline  
Old 03-27-2001, 01:41 PM   #23
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Most modern translations make mention of it:
NIV, NASB, NET...

I use mainly the NIV and NASB, when not using the GNT and BHS for the original languages.

Ish
 
Old 03-27-2001, 04:24 PM   #24
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Layman,

Hilarius posed a question and I wanted to attempt to answer it. I browse all forums here from time to time, looking for intersting discussions. I usually just read, but rarely enter into them.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.